China scuttles India's bid to enter NSG

[Spectre]

these stupid chinese forgets that it is because of india china become a permanent member of UNSC. that seat was offered to india, but india rejected it and support china for becoming a permanent member of UNSC, now this is how they return the favor india did for them.
one word to describe chines people is ""@$$ holes"

No need to get so emotional bro. It's just politics.

There are no such thing as permanent friends or enemies, each country pursues policy which would give it maximum benefit.

Can't really blame China as India has potential to become its chief competitor for resources, prestige and trade so its but natural that they would try to contain us.

As they say in Hollywood "Nothing personal, It's just business"

 

[master_13]

these stupid chinese forgets that it is because of india china become a permanent member of UNSC. that seat was offered to india, but india rejected it and support china for becoming a permanent member of UNSC, now this is how they return the favor india did for them.
one word to describe chines people is ""@$$ holes"

wow, offered to the indian, and indian gave up for China, such lie was debunked numerous times, even by indian media itself. no, you never even had a chance to get that seat, china obtained the seat as a successor to republic of china, just like russia obtained the seat in succession to soviet union. India never even had a chance to get that seat. Since Indian are so prone in telling delusional stores, here's my version, china offered the P5 seat to india, but everybody else blocked it, so china had no choice but to retained the P5 seat. Keep making up your stories, and we'll make up ours.

 

[Shan-e-ibrahim]

China doing everything possible to stop India's economic growth.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

dont you get bored with this worst famine BS????

Are you calling your own Indian Army a liar?

According to the Indian Army's own internal military report (Henderson-Brooks report), India attacked us during our worst ever famine, and they still lost.

How do you justify attacking a man dying of starvation, and still losing?

 

[MastanKhan]

It is a well known fact that Pakistan do not need to detonate the ready made bomb !

Counter my argument instead of becoming agitated and giving negative ratings !

Why China Helped Countries Like Pakistan, North Korea Build Nuclear Bombs - US News

Pakistani nuclear scientist's accounts tell of Chinese proliferation

Who Created Pakistan's Nuclear Arsenal? | Jamyang Norbu

Hi,

Sir---you are in error---china did not do much---. My uncle---God bless his soul---was one of the pioneers to Pakistani nuclear program---. him and all his colleagues were educated in England, Netherlands, france, USA, Germany etc etc etc----.

When they used to go for procurement of the material----it used to be westward and not to china----. China came in much later----.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

please stop this Propaganda BS buddy. you are behaving like a child.
Henderson-Brooks report is still classified and not disclosed. how do you know what is inside that report???

The report has been leaked already.

Here, from India's own internal military report, the Henderson-Brooks report:

It wasn't China, but Nehru who declared 1962 war - The Times of India

And the Indian government recently said they are going to declassify it. Obviously, since everyone already knows what is inside it.

If it was fake (as if Neville Maxwell wrote an entire Indian Army report on his own, lol?) then the Indian government could simply come out and say, "It doesn't match the one in our records".

But they didn't. Instead they said they are going to declassify it.

You guys attacked us in the middle of our famine, that is from your own Army report. And the Indian Army obviously knows more about what happened than a bunch of internet fanboys.

 

[Gibbs]

these stupid chinese forgets that it is because of india china become a permanent member of UNSC. that seat was offered to india, but india rejected it and support china for becoming a permanent member of UNSC, now this is how they return the favor india did for them.
one word to describe chines people is ""@$$ holes"

What ??!!??

When the UNSC was established in 1946 India did not even exist, It was a British colony.. Where do you people get these mumbo jumbo ?

 

[Obambam]

What ??!!??

When the UNSC was established in 1946 India did not even exist, It was a British colony.. Where do you people get these mumbo jumbo ?

He should have blamed Nikita Khrushchev and Jawaharlal Nehru instead. One for pressuring them into backing China (commie power ) and the other bowed to pressure and subsequently backing China. It was not a favour they did for China willingly.

 

[IND151]

Thats what China said in 2008, then............................

Thats what I said in post number 6.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

seems because of excessive friendship with Pakistanis the chinese are also becoming masters in conspiracy theories.
come on buddy accept fact. that report is still classified and government has already told that they will not declassify it.
you should thank us we are keeping chinese back stabbing classified.

So again, you're calling the Indian Army a liar?

Just because you can't accept that you attacked and lost against a China that was collapsing from starvation, doesn't change the facts.

The report was leaked, and obviously they checked the original copy to see if it was fake. It obviously isn't, that's why they are unable to contest it.

And don't tell me that Neville Maxwell wrote an entire Indian Army report by himself. That is too ridiculous even for you guys.

 

[kaku1]

What ??!!??

When the UNSC was established in 1946 India did not even exist, It was a British colony.. Where do you people get these mumbo jumbo ?

The Hindu : `Nehru declined offer of permanent U.N. seat'
India and the United Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Obama supports adding India as a permanent member of U.N. Security Council

India was offered a permanent seat on the council 55 years ago, in 1955. But that offer, made by the United States and the Soviet Union, was declined by India's first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Nehru said the seat should be given to China instead.

History is good thing to learn, instead of laughing.

 

[chou.wong]

China doing everything possible to stop India's economic growth.

poor indian,chinese have never pay any attention on indian !don't think you are much to important for us !

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

The Hindu : `Nehru declined offer of permanent U.N. seat'
India and the United Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Obama supports adding India as a permanent member of U.N. Security Council



History is good thing to learn, instead of laughing.

BS. Firstly, the ROC/Taiwan (America's close ally) held China's seat back then.

Why would America take a seat from their close ally (ROC/Taiwan) and give it to India who was closer to the Soviet Union?

Makes no sense.

And in any case, Nehru fully denied those rumors.

The Hindu : Miscellaneous / This Day That Age : dated September 28, 1955: UN seat: Nehru clarifies

Prime Minister Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for India in the UN Security Council. He made this statement in reply to a short notice question in the Lok Sabha on September 27 by Dr. J.N. Parekh whether India had refused a seat informally offered to her in the Security Council.

The Prime Minister said: "There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact. The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter. There is, therefore, no question of a seat being offered and India declining it. Our declared policy is to support the admission of all nations qualified for UN membership.''

Read the second paragraph closely. It was literally impossible.

 

[kaku1]

BS, firstly the ROC (America's close ally) held China's seat back then.

Why would America take a seat from their close ally (ROC) and give it to India who was closer to the Soviet Union?

Makes no sense.

And in any case, Nehru fully denied those rumors.

The Hindu : Miscellaneous / This Day That Age : dated September 28, 1955: UN seat: Nehru clarifies

Prime Minister Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for India in the UN Security Council. He made this statement in reply to a short notice question in the Lok Sabha on September 27 by Dr. J.N. Parekh whether India had refused a seat informally offered to her in the Security Council. The Prime Minister said: "There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact.

The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter. There is, therefore, no question of a seat being offered and India declining it. Our declared policy is to support the admission of all nations qualified for UN membership.''

Read the second paragraph closely. It was literally impossible.

You making argument about 62 from same newspapers about leaked report. But when it come to about India, even hen WP reported this, then become BS.

Wow, I must do a big clap for you. Btw we talking about 50s.

And yes Nehru denied this rumors in millennium era.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

You making argument about 62 from same newspapers about leaked report. But when it come to about, even WP reported this, then become BS.

Wow, I must to a big clap for you. Btw we talking about 50s.

And yes Nehru denied this rumors in millennium era.

In the 1950's-1960's it was the ROC/Taiwan who held China's seat, and they were a close ally of America.

So why would America take the seat from their close ally, and give it to Soviet-friendly India?

Any logic?

And read Nehru's second paragraph again. The UN charter gives permanent seats to five countries, not governments.

The seat can change government, like ROC -> PRC, or USSR -> Russian Federation. But it can't change country, the country remains the same in both cases.