China says ending cooperation with US on multiple issues

[SIPRA]

Well done, China.

 

[Catalystic]

Will they both stop ALL trade immediately and forever?

Just some bullshit from both. Making people fool yet again

 

[S10]

Americans have clearly chose confrontation with their whole "get though on China" stance. Why bother cooperating with someone constantly trying to provoke you and impede your progress? They did the same thing to Japan in the 1980's, except Japan caved in and entered into a 30 year stagnation they could not recover from. US will become hostile as soon as you threaten their dominance.

China should focus on Africa, Middle East, SE Asia and South America as primary partners for economic development. Even Europe has little potential to deepen ties since they're aligned with US more often than not.

 

[hirobo2]

I kept saying Japanese lost WWII because of Low IQ. People often confuse technical competency with being smart.

USA never met an opponent smarter than them before. They're trying same tricks they used with opponents of lower IQ but none of them worked on China.

China was dragged down by stupid Qing dynasty allowing inferior entities like the USA to temporarily get ahead. But that was a neccessary step to have Qing unite all of China before we can get to national rejuvination...

 

[Yaoudelizard]

I kept saying Japanese lost WWII because of Low IQ. People often confuse technical competency with being smart.

USA never met an opponent smarter than them before. They're trying same tricks they used with opponents of lower IQ but none of them worked on China.

China was dragged down by stupid Qing dynasty allowing inferior entities like the USA to temporarily get ahead. But that was a neccessary step to have Qing unite all of China before we can get to national rejuvination...

IQ vs EQ. The ability to read books vs the ability to read people.

 

[S10]

I kept saying Japanese lost WWII because of Low IQ. People often confuse technical competency with being smart.

USA never met an opponent smarter than them before. They're trying same tricks they used with opponents of lower IQ but none of them worked on China.

China was dragged down by stupid Qing dynasty allowing inferior entities like the USA to temporarily get ahead. But that was a neccessary step to have Qing unite all of China before we can get to national rejuvination...

It's not like Japan lacked strategists. What they did not have was the industrial and technological parity with US. For every plane, ship or tank Japan produced, Americans were producing 5 better ones. Later battles become lopsided fights because Japanese forces simply did not have the firepower to match US, and their losses were horrific. Because of these losses, their military could not retained experience officers and soldiers to be as effective as they were in the early stages of the war.

The difference today is that China is the bigger industrial power. For every tank, plane and ship American produces, China can produce more at lower cost. The tables have turned.

 

[truthseeker2010]

It's not like Japan lacked strategists. What they did not have was the industrial and technological parity with US. For every plane, ship or tank Japan produced, Americans were producing 5 better ones. Later battles become lopsided fights because Japanese forces simply did not have the firepower to match US, and their losses were horrific. Because of these losses, their military could not retained experience officers and soldiers to be as effective as they were in the early stages of the war.

The difference today is that China is the bigger industrial power. For every tank, plane and ship American produces, China can produce more at lower cost. The tables have turned.

Don't say this, **** generals and US fanboys will get hurt.

 

[kankan326]

IQ vs EQ. The ability to read books vs the ability to read people.

In my opinion,

IQ: Chinese ≧ Japanese > Americans > Indians
EQ: Indians > Americans > Chinese > Japanese

 

[Yaoudelizard]

In my opinion,

IQ: Chinese ≧ Japanese > Americans > Indians
EQ: Indians > Americans > Chinese > Japanese

EQ is more than just being able to BS people though, it’s also being able to read people’s intention accurately. I think Chinese have terrible skills in BS, but are quite accurate at reading other people’s intentions.

 

[Daniel808]

Should did this since long time ago

 

[Sharma Ji]

Well there is some good to take from this, not because Sino - US relations are on a downswing but because this green climate BS has taken a hit.

 

[MH.Yang]

EQ is more than just being able to BS people though, it’s also being able to read people’s intention accurately. I think Chinese have terrible skills in BS, but are quite accurate at reading other people’s intentions.

Although East Asians generally have a high IQ, they are usually introverted and prone to depression and mental breakdown. East Asia is also a high incidence area of mental diseases.

God is fair and cannot give you all the advantages. So I also agree that the EQ of East Asians is low.

 

[Wergeland]

It's not like Japan lacked strategists. What they did not have was the industrial and technological parity with US. For every plane, ship or tank Japan produced, Americans were producing 5 better ones. Later battles become lopsided fights because Japanese forces simply did not have the firepower to match US, and their losses were horrific. Because of these losses, their military could not retained experience officers and soldiers to be as effective as they were in the early stages of the war.

The difference today is that China is the bigger industrial power. For every tank, plane and ship American produces, China can produce more at lower cost. The tables have turned.

Japan challenged USA at a bad timing. USA then was still a ascending power and probably in its zenith. Japan neither had the numbers and tech superiority to ever hope to beat America.

 

[Basel]

Japan challenged USA at a bad timing. USA then was still a ascending power and probably in its zenith. Japan neither had the numbers and tech superiority to ever hope to beat America.

The main reason for Peral Harbor was US sanctions on Japan, they blocked oil supplies to Japan and created a situation in Which Japan had to take action militarily, US had intelligence about upcoming attack on Pearl Harbor but they let it happen to start aa war with Japan to achieve their goals in Asia Pacific region and at the end of WW-II they achieved them.

 

[REhorror]

If the japanese has studied Sun Tzu a bit more carefully, they could have won WW2 or at least in a more favorable position.
They are very good at tactics, but bad at strategy.

But maybe this is a national character thing, Hideyoshi failed to expand, but Tokugawa built the golden age of Edo by staying in Japan. Similar to how Meiji tried to expand but failed, while japanese bureaucrats made Japan 2nd of the world by staying in Japan. Perhaps japanese staying in Japan was the right idea all along.

EDIT: And a lot people shittalk the Qing, but in reality, the Qing was much more impressive than the Ming. People liked the Ming because Ming is ruled by Han people while Qing is ruled by Manchu. But Ming era was just another 2nd Song with all the civil war, foreign invasions and bad emperors. Meanwhile Qing expanded borders in all direction (except Tokugawa Japan and Nguyen Vietnam), and even managed to fought off europeans at times.

The only problem with Qing is that it failed to modernize in due times.