What's new

China’s ties with others must not hurt India, PM tells Xi Jinping

selvan33

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
1,267
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
China’s ties with others must not hurt India, PM tells Xi Jinping


M_Id_371137_Manmohan-Xi_Jinping.jpg


In an obvious reference to the nature of China’s relationship with Pakistan and some of India’s other neighbours, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is learnt to have told China’s new President, Xi Jinping, that it’s important for Beijing not to allow its ties with other countries become an impediment to advancing India-China relations.

Singh conveyed this to Xi in their first meeting in Durban on Wednesday night even as they struck a healthy rapport during the 45 minutes they spent with each other. Sources, however, said Singh did not make the point in a confronting manner.

China and Pakistan recently signed an agreement to build the Chashma-3 nuclear reactor despite serious objections from the Nuclear Suppliers Group. Many other countries such as Sri Lanka, Nepal and Maldives have also been repeatedly playing the China card to threaten India.

Xi did not respond to Singh’s comment but is believed to have emphasised on deepening “security and military trust” between India and China by conducting more joint exercises and training, while also looking to enhance maritime cooperation.

The Chinese President, sources said, felt India and China had a strategic opportunity now to upgrade their military cooperation, a subject Beijing has been pushing at the official level too.

Xi also proposed that the two countries jointly build high-speed railways in India given the giant strides China has made in this area. He felt that such efforts could pave the way for greater cooperation in mega projects in the future. Railways is one area which was identified in the India-China economic dialogue as a potential area of cooperation since it is state-owned in India as well.

The only concern that the Chinese side raised was the Tibet issue, where Xi hoped India would maintain its responsible position. Later, sources said, the PM reaffirmed India’s stand, conveying that the Tibet Autonomous Region was a part of China and also reminded Xi of the measures India took to ensure the Beijing Olympic Games torch travelled peacefully through India.

It’s learnt that both leaders touched upon the border row but reposed faith in the Special Representative (SR) Mechanism as the best way forward with Xi hoping for a fair, reasonable and acceptable outcome. They also took note of the fact that both sides have maintained peace and tranquility on the border.

While the Chinese side has not yet named the SR on its side after Dai Bingguo relinquished office, the responsibility is expected to fall on new State Councillor and former foreign minister Yang Jiechi, who was also part of Xi’s delegation at the talks.

Singh, sources said, managed to flag most of India’s core concerns and specifically spoke about trans-border rivers, where Xi did make the point that China shares hydrological data with its neighbours and promised to study the PM’s proposal for a joint mechanism.

The overall tenor of the conversation, sources said, was constructive with Xi describing the two countries as ancient civilizations with a prosperous future. Singh felt both countries were moving through a transformation, which provides opportunities for cooperation and it’s for the two governments to make the best of it.
China's ties with others must not hurt India, PM tells Xi Jinping - Indian Express
 
. .
China and Pakistan recently signed an agreement to build the Chashma-3 nuclear reactor despite serious objections from the Nuclear Suppliers Group. Many other countries such as Sri Lanka, Nepal and Maldives have also been repeatedly playing the China card to threaten India.

THose signed or potential nuclear projects are for civilian purposes. When usa and india have their nuclear development programs signed, how much pre-conditions or protests were heard from other countries?
 
.
the article makes no sense since China just gave Pakistan a nuclear deal secretly.
 
.
THose signed or potential nuclear projects are for civilian purposes. When usa and india have their nuclear development programs signed, how much pre-conditions or protests were heard from other countries?

Because India had credible nuclear non-proliferation record, Where as Pakistan is a known proliferated nation through which North Korea got nuke technology!!!

OMG.... You guys need burnol

:-) No need, Japan offered to open up its defense exports to India!!!
 
.
THose signed or potential nuclear projects are for civilian purposes. When usa and india have their nuclear development programs signed, how much pre-conditions or protests were heard from other countries?

the article diplomatically mentions about the civilian use.do u really believe that china has nothing to do with their nukes??.and yes u.s has got nothing to do with our weapons
 
.
Because India had credible nuclear non-proliferation record, Where as Pakistan is a known proliferated nation through which North Korea got nuke technology!!!

the article diplomatically mentions about the civilian use.do u really believe that china has nothing to do with their nukes??.and yes u.s has got nothing to do with our weapons

Show us the proof that Pakistan has supplied nuclear related material to N Korea!
The us can also help you guys out with anything on big bucks. They are your strategic alliy!
 
.
Show us the proof that Pakistan has supplied nuclear related material to N Korea!
The us can also help you guys out with anything on big bucks. They are your strategic alliy!

u knw the truth.and anyways not going to accept the entire world except urs..as for the bolded part.we're nobodies ally and not surely of u.s's.we got an independent foreign policy which is in our interest..ur friend pakistan is more of a strategic ally to them..
Strategic Ally:
http://globalsecuritystudies.com/Quinlan Pakistan Final.pdf
 
.
u knw the truth.and anyways not going to accept the entire world except urs..as for the bolded part.we're nobodies ally and not surely of u.s's.we got an independent foreign policy which is in our interest..ur friend pakistan is more of a strategic ally to them..
Strategic Ally:
http://globalsecuritystudies.com/Quinlan Pakistan Final.pdf

Does Pakistan need to conform to academic papers?

On the face "no" - only to reinforce more favour from the yanks. Every one can see that.
You people are bending like willows according to where the wind blows
 
.
Does Pakistan need to conform to academic papers?

On the face "no" - only to reinforce more favour from the yanks. Every one can see that.
You people are bending like willows according to where the wind blows

we have the same foreign policy as urs.self interest.if ours is what u say it is.urs is no different from ours.besides we dont cheat anybody stating them as friends.know whats reason for the low forex reserves of pakistan ??its china.if ur so concerned of pakistan why not import more??u take 3 times more money from them than u give them through trade.dont say CHINA-PAKISTAN friendship b.s to me
 
. .
India is afraid its days of bullying its South Asian neighbors are over as China builds our string of pearls.
 
. .
we have the same foreign policy as urs.self interest.if ours is what u say it is.urs is no different from ours.besides we dont cheat anybody stating them as friends.know whats reason for the low forex reserves of pakistan ??its china.if ur so concerned of pakistan why not import more??u take 3 times more money from them than u give them through trade.dont say CHINA-PAKISTAN friendship b.s to me

Pakistanis are free to choose of not buying from us. If it is not us who is supplying and Pakistanis who are buying, their FX reserve would have been totally depleted many years ago. That is what you are BS about!

Just take this nuclear project as an example. We are building for them as they want us to. What is wrong apart from the NPT BS. Do you think the Pakistanis are not doing careful feasibilty and cost-benefit anaysis b4 they sign the project!
 
.
Pakistanis are free to choose of not buying from us. If it is not us who is supplying and Pakistanis who are buying, their FX reserve would have been totally depleted many years ago. That is what you are BS about!

Just take this nuclear project as an example. We are building for them as they want us to. What is wrong apart from the NPT BS. Dont you think the Pakistanis are not doing careful feasibilty and cost-benefit anaysis b4 they sign the project!

im least bothered about ur civilian project.dont you agree with the above sentence??because trade b/w u both is about 12 billion contrast to with india's running towards $100 billions with in next two years.out of which u import just a megre $3 billion and export $9 billion .which means u take out 3 times more reserves from them than u give them.u befriended them and took control of their investments and mines..poor people by the time they realize it'll be too late
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom