What's new

China’s J-10B fighter to Pak worries India

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what about Su34?
Its is strike variant of Su30 series.


You cant do other than that and sleep well.
Gd n8 .

Your this reply clearly portrays that you jst want to troll, have a nice trolling journey on this thread, you are genious , born in 1992 , so 19 years old boy if i m not wrong :azn:

:wave:
 
.
Yes Su30mki can act as mini awacs and its a true multirole fighter.
It lacks stealth,Supercruise that akes it 4.5 gen fighter.
Mki has huge rcs so it will be leader with lca/mrca's.
MKi has good jammers and Growlers can be procured from US easily .
I can explain why.

As far as 'mini-AWACS' go, here it is:
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/e-2d-hawkeye-the-navys-new-awacs-03443/

The SU-30MKI is not intended for that. It requires a specialized aircraft for that role.

Dude the capabilities will keep on developing through out development.
Eurofighter/F22 can strike but not as effective as F-18

lolwut? The F-22 is king of the skies.
 
. .
lolwut? The F-22 is king of the skies.

Again, buddy, you are confusing yourself with Strike fighters and Airsuperiority fighters. Strike fighters are mainly for Ground attack and need more sensors and A2G bombs, Sensors to avoid detection and need to have extremely effective Jamming systems, to take out radar stations, A2A missle stations and all.something that F-35 and F-18 Growlers have and are configured to do such role.

F-22 is meant to rule the sky, Take out all incoming aircrafts, indulge in dog fight and give escort to the "Strike fighters"....get the difference.
 
.
Again, buddy, you are confusing yourself with Strike fighters and Airsuperiority fighters. Strike fighters are mainly for Ground attack and need more sensors and A2G bombs, Sensors to avoid detection and need to have extremely effective Jamming systems, to take out radar stations, A2A missle stations and all.something that F-35 and F-18 Growlers have and are configured to do such role.

F-22 is meant to rule the sky, Take out all incoming aircrafts, indulge in dog fight and give escort to the "Strike fighters"....get the difference.

The F-22 can hit ground targets for that matter :azn:
 
.
The F-22 can hit ground targets for that matter :azn:

Then countries dont need strike fighters, One fighter to do the ground role and same fighter to do the airsuperiority role....why did they build F-15 when they had F-18 and F-16s??...One F-15 was enough correct?

Or you are saying you have a better suggestion here to all the planners in US Airforce?:azn:
 
.
Then countries dont need strike fighters, One fighter to do the ground role and same fighter to do the airsuperiority role....why did they build F-15 when they had F-18 and F-16s??...One F-15 was enough correct?

Or you are saying you have a better suggestion here to all the planners in US Airforce?:azn:

I think F-15 came first, followed by F-16 & then F-18
 
. .
God ! I can't believe the thread is actually running this long.
Typical trolls ! The lot of ya.
 
.
As far as 'mini-AWACS' go, here it is:
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/e-2d-hawkeye-the-navys-new-awacs-03443/

The SU-30MKI is not intended for that. It requires a specialized aircraft for that role.



lolwut? The F-22 is king of the skies.
That is a downgraded AWACS.
Su30mki has the ability to guide other Russian aircrafts .
Ill give an example.
An RXX missile can be mounted on Mig21 that can be controlled by mki (which is 20km behind ) immediately after its launch. That works as same missile that is launched from that of mki.
The radar range is although less than dedicated mini AWACS, but the coordinate passing capability and long range makes mki a mini AWACS.

and f22 cannot carry more than 3000kg weapon load in internal bays, else there is loss of stealth.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom