china reveals new long range bomber

[sicsheep]

russians have not introduced new bombers
the most modern russian bombers are tu-160, tu-22m

Russians Navy has not built any surface ships larger than 4000 tons for the last 15 years, it does not mean she doesn't need any, or large surface ships are outdated lol

 

[Mustang06]

russians have not introduced new bombers
the most modern russian bombers are tu-160, tu-22m

I think they have plans for a new one!..
I dont remember the name of that program!

 

[Manindra]

I think they have plans for a new one!..
I dont remember the name of that program!

PAK-DA

 

[SipahSalar]

Pure proprietary bombers are out of fashion. They are of little use in today's environment. Multi role platforms are more cost effective and flexible where deployment is concerned. I wonder why the Chinese are going back in time?

They are still the way to go if you want a platform for several long range Anti ship cruise missiles.

 

[PRC2025]

Bombers can be used to support troops on the ground as well as attacking enemy infrastructure!!
If it was an outdated concept US and Russian would have shelved plans for new bombers!
Just my 2 cents!!

Correct, agree. It doesn't matter that H-6 versions aren't "stealth. Neither is B-52, B-1 Lancer or Tu-22 and Tu-160. It's very good flying platform to support other troops and deliver more missiles against various targets.

So it pretty much doesn't matter what it's "combat radius" is. It can just fire missiles right outside Shanghai airspace, and those missiles will still reach pretty far away into the Western Pacific. So the missiles it's carrying is far more important than its combat radius.

 

[thepakistani]

Dear fellows ....Some people have grievous mutations in their genes ...what ever logic you give them, they would say ram ram... they are blind to that unable to accept ground realities......so no need to exert with them, let them say their language but we should remain to the point.

 

[cirr]

 

[wiseone2]

Russians Navy has not built any surface ships larger than 4000 tons for the last 15 years, it does not mean she doesn't need any, or large surface ships are outdated lol

problem with bombers and large ships is that they are sitting ducks to American air force

 

[sicsheep]

problem with bombers and large ships is that they are sitting ducks to American air force

lol why is Russians buying the Mistral?

and I guess all the big transport /refuel /AWACS plane can all retire now right?

 

[wiseone2]

lol why is Russians buying the Mistral?

and I guess all the big transport /refuel /AWACS plane can all retire now right?

Mistral is for amphibious assault on New York City. lol.
Mistral would be for scenarios where the Russians do not fight America.

the big transport/refuellers/AWACS cannot operate if USAF has air superiority

 

[sicsheep]

Mistral is for amphibious assault on New York City. lol.
Mistral would be for scenarios where the Russians do not fight America.

the big transport/refuellers/AWACS cannot operate if USAF has air superiority

Exactly lol we are not building an army to only USA , so Mistral is not sitting duck or not?

 

[Ultima Thule]

it's probably a regional bomber like F-111, china is developing fly wing like B-2 for their strategical needs

 

[Akasa]

The latest rumors suggest that parts of the first H-X bomber prototype are being manufactured.

 

[Ultima Thule]

The latest rumors suggest that parts of the first H-X bomber prototype are being manufactured.

give us link please

 

[SOHEIL]