What's new

China responds to the US Navy build up in the South China Sea !

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
Missile power ‘trump card', says PLA division
The Hindu : News / International : Missile power

The People's Liberation Army's (PLA) Second Artillery Corps, its most secretive division in charge of nuclear and conventional missiles, has described its assets as a trump card as China faces a growing number of security challenges in the region.

Officers from the Second Artillery Corps provided a rare insight into the functioning of the famously mysterious division by inviting journalists from Chinese State-run media outlets to visits its headquarters near Beijing.

The officers' comments were expectedly guarded, but reflected a rising sense of confidence only days after a PLA Lieutenant-General responded to the announcement of an increased deployment by the United States of 60 per cent of its naval forces in the Pacific, up from around half, by stressing that China had the capabilities “to strike back”.

“Conventional missiles are a trump card in modern warfare,” Tan Weihong, the brigade's commander, told the official China Daily. “So we must be ready at any time. We must be able to deliver a quick response to attacks, hit the targets with high accuracy, and destroy them totally.”

He added that of the 114 missiles the brigade had launched so far, “all have accurately hit the target”.

The officers revealed that the brigade spent one-third of every year outside its bases, testing its missile-launching vehicles in different terrains, from the forests of south China — most of the deployments, according to many analysts, are thought to be directed towards Taiwan, still awarded utmost importance by the PLA — to the “windy plateaus of the nation's northwest”, in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR), where the disputed border with India is the presumed focus.

Brigade commander Tan said the brigade had developed a new commanding system “to replace the old one that was based on vocal orders” to enhance its capabilities for multiple launches. “The new system can handle multiple launches at the same time, which was impossible in the past,” he said.

On Saturday, PLA Lieutenant-General Ren Haiquan, who represented the Chinese delegation at the Shangri-La security dialogue in Singapore where the U.S. announced its new commitments to the Pacific, said China would improve the capabilities of its forces to “strike back” against any threat to its fundamental interests.

While he stressed that China “will not attack unless we are attacked”, he cautioned that China had “the measures to strike back when fundamental national interests are under threat.” His comments drew attention against the backdrop of on-going disputes between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea, where their ships have been involved in a stand-off, and increasing concern in Beijing over new

American moves, including strengthening its naval presence, deploying 2,500 marines in Australia and boosting ties with the Philippines.

“We still face a very complex, sometimes severe, situation,” said Lieutenant-General Ren. “We will be prepared for all complexities. There's a saying: Work for the best and prepare for the worst.”
 
.
no body is going to fight anybody. trade between china & the US is very huge, same with all the asian countries around china.. this american naval expansion is just adding more dept than ever before. they are just beggar acting tough with borrowed chinese money..
 
.
About f**king time we DRAMATICALLY increased our military spending.

We spend $1.7 trillion in government expenditure every year.
Of that we spend about 7% on the military ($120 billion).
We need to spend 20% on military ($340 billion).

In comparison, US spends about $3.8 trillion in government expenditure every year.
Of that they spend about 18.5% on the military ($700 billion).

Economic and military power gives enormous political power.

We also need to increase our spending on R&D.
 
.
^^^ That amount will be around 5% of Chinese GDP.

Remember that other Asian countries are also likely to increase their spending in response. The two largest(India and Japan) will also spend a lot more in response to China.

In the end, China will be no safer than it was before and now will have a heavy burden of military expenditure which will divert funds away from other areas.

It is better for China to stick to the current proportion of GDP that it spends on defence and allow it's fast growing economy to do the job on increasing military funds year on year dramatically.
 
.
^^^ That amount will be around 5% of Chinese GDP.

Remember that other Asian countries are also likely to increase their spending in response. The two largest(India and Japan) will also spend a lot more in response to China.

In the end, China will be no safer than it was before and now will have a heavy burden of military expenditure which will divert funds away from other areas.

It is better for China to stick to the current proportion of GDP that it spends on defence and allow it's fast growing economy to do the job on increasing military funds year on year dramatically.

in terms of fiscality and in percentage terms of our GDP, we got more room to spend than japan and indian combined - and our GDP is not smaller than these two combined either.

we will spend the nipponzi and hindus to death who even have to rely on spending on more expensive, imported weaponry
 
.
Back
Top Bottom