What's new

China Reiterates Support for Argentinian Claim Over Disputed U.K.-Controlled Islands

with what 2 Casino Carriers ?
Why do you call them "casino carriers"? Your Lizzie is no more capable than Liaoning and Shandong. All are conventionally powered STOBAR carriers. Pot, kettle.

In any event, I was thinking something more practical. Like the excellent Sino-Pakistani fighter jets you proudly display in your avatar (a splendid example of China and Pakistan's strategic partnership and cooperation) equipped with some serious anti-ship missiles. Something like this
JF-17-CM-400AKG-01.jpg

Now isn't that nice? Much better than rinky-dink Exocets. Much, much more dangerous.
Xi has destroyed Chinas foreign image and soon a Royal Navy will calling in the South China Sea and he will be in a panic
You're not on China's level. As for the silly games the US plays, they ultimately count for nothing. Back in the day a war would have already broken out when one power threatens to overtake another, but the US doesn't have the courage to start a war. It has to assuage its damaged ego with these silly games, which don't cost China a thing.
 
.
Why do you call them "casino carriers"? Your Lizzie is no more capable than Liaoning and Shandong. All are conventionally powered STOBAR carriers. Pot, kettle.

In any event, I was thinking something more practical. Like the excellent Sino-Pakistani fighter jets you proudly display in your avatar (a splendid example of China and Pakistan's strategic partnership and cooperation) equipped with some serious anti-ship missiles. Something like this
JF-17-CM-400AKG-01.jpg

Now isn't that nice? Much better than rinky-dink Exocets. Much, much more dangerous.

You're not on China's level. As for the silly games the US plays, they ultimately count for nothing. Back in the day a war would have already broken out when one power threatens to overtake another, but the US doesn't have the courage to start a war. It has to assuage its damaged ego with these silly games, which don't cost China a thing.
Only if they have the money to buy.
 
. .
Only if they have the money to buy.
Even if they don't, what's a few fighter jets with supersonic anti-ship missiles between friends? Besides, when the Argentines handle business (or, as our Indian friends might say, do the needful) I'm sure they'll be happy to sign a few BRI contracts on favourable terms.
 
.
Why do you call them "casino carriers"? Your Lizzie is no more capable than Liaoning and Shandong. All are conventionally powered STOBAR carriers. Pot, kettle.

In any event, I was thinking something more practical. Like the excellent Sino-Pakistani fighter jets you proudly display in your avatar (a splendid example of China and Pakistan's strategic partnership and cooperation) equipped with some serious anti-ship missiles. Something like this
JF-17-CM-400AKG-01.jpg

Now isn't that nice? Much better than rinky-dink Exocets. Much, much more dangerous.

You're not on China's level. As for the silly games the US plays, they ultimately count for nothing. Back in the day a war would have already broken out when one power threatens to overtake another, but the US doesn't have the courage to start a war. It has to assuage its damaged ego with these silly games, which don't cost China a thing.

QE has the largest 5th generation naval air wing in the world

so now I will wait for the Chinese fanboys to tell me how J15 which is copy of 1980s Su33 is somehow better

keep dreaming
 
.
QE has the largest 5th generation naval air wing in the world
Oooooo... that sounds dangerous. I think China might have to give Argentina some heavier firepower to handle the largest 5th generation naval air wing in the world. Something like...
message-editor%2F1541444173994-cm-401-missile.jpg

Not much of a naval air wing if it's got nothing to land on.

You're going to lose a current colony because you couldn't stop running your mouth about a former colony. Of course, I use "your" here as a courtesy.:omghaha:
 
.
Oooooo... that sounds dangerous. I think China might have to give Argentina some heavier firepower to handle the largest 5th generation naval air wing in the world. Something like...
message-editor%2F1541444173994-cm-401-missile.jpg

Not much of a naval air wing if it's got nothing to land on.

You're going to lose a current colony because you couldn't stop running your mouth about a former colony. Of course, I use "your" here as a courtesy.:omghaha:

yes North Korea also have this

and how will you reach UK with this sit on top of it?

this why UK can send its warship to China but China cannot send to UK waters
 
. .
QE has the largest 5th generation naval air wing in the world

so now I will wait for the Chinese fanboys to tell me how J15 which is copy of 1980s Su33 is somehow better

keep dreaming

Do you think DF-21 & DF-26 will not be used against any invasion naval force??

China is behind but it doesn't mean that UK can face them alone.
 
. . .
I have to say event's are playing out much better and quicker than I thought.
What I envision hopefully comes to fruition soon.
 
.
Qing dynasties also said this with 1,000 ship navy

we all know what happened next

I don't think that is a good comparison as the Qing Dynasty Navy mostly composed of out dated Junk Ships (that's what they were called it's not an insult) that had shields on them for protection along with spears, long guns and inaccurate cannons. While the British Navy had well armed ships with cannons, muskets and better all around protection. Their was to much power disparity, it's like Israeli Navy and Palestinian fisherman in boats fighting each other, and let's not forget the French were also involved in this.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Back
Top Bottom