Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To act as an mediator, one has to create some sense of credibility. When a country wants to block India's NSG membership inventing an absurd clause of its own (to sign NPT), does not care for International verdict itself (ICJ verdict on SCS), blocks Masud Azhar to be declared as an UN designated terrorist (only country among 15 in UNSC), such credibility goes to ditch. And don't forget this is the same country, whose official mouth piece was envisaging entering Kashmir on behalf of Pakistan just few days back.
You are right. Bad on my part. Regarding NSG, was France a signatory of NPT when it became part of NSG?Facts don't apply to Indian in this forum. Signing NPT is the prerequisite laid down by NSG, not China. India is trying to bypass the rule, which 10 countries objected. India media only blame China. The verdict on SCS is passed an arbitrarily court called PCA. It has no relation with ICJ.
China has expressed willingness to play a constructive role in improving tense relations between Pakistan and India.
Any positive mediation should be welcomed, not ridiculed...
To act as an mediator, one has to create some sense of credibility
India is country that do not deserve any respect
Musharraf came close to Peace only because his Indian Counterpart, Mr Vajpayee was willing to listen...
You are right. Bad on my part. Regarding NSG, was France a signatory of NPT when it became part of NSG?
All major countries have agreed to delink NPT issue from NSG, except China which leads a small group of ten countries to hard press on this single point. Legal complexities could have been sorted out easily had it not been Chinese obstinacy in the facade of moral innocence to keep India out at all cost. It is not difficult to understand that this just another Chinese 'technical hold' to safeguard their strategic interests.France was a founder member of NSG, the issue of NPT for membership doesn't apply to founder, but new member. That was a retarded logic from India foreign ministry. The point here is India application is objected by 10 countries who wanted a set of consistent rule for all aspiring members. But India media took aim only at China.
New Recruit
All major countries have agreed to delink NPT issue from NSG, except China which leads a small group of ten countries to hard press on this single point. Legal complexities could have been sorted out easily had it not been Chinese obstinacy in the facade of moral innocence to keep India out at all cost. It is not difficult to understand that this just another Chinese 'technical hold' to safeguard their strategic interests.
To act as an mediator, one has to create some sense of credibility. When a country wants to block India's NSG membership inventing an absurd clause of its own (to sign NPT), does not care for International verdict itself (ICJ verdict on SCS), blocks Masud Azhar to be declared as an UN designated terrorist (only country among 15 in UNSC), such credibility goes to ditch. And don't forget this is the same country, whose official mouth piece was envisaging entering Kashmir on behalf of Pakistan just few days back.
Is there any reason not to?Are you guys still complaining about NSG, Masood Azhar .