What's new

China readies for a sharp short war with Japan

Taiwan is too close to China, and China's smerch (500km of range) alone can lift the entire island.

But bombing our Chinese-speaking brothers and sisters won't be a nice thing.
Seem like u dont understand that China can not retake TW just by bombing it. US troop in Okinawa will arrive to TW before China navy can step its foot to TW soil and push u back to the main land.

China only can take Senkaku, can not take TW or Okinawa. Ur army is incapable to do that, China never have a single smart and well-known general in its history even during WW 2 or war against VN in 1979.
 
.
Seem like u dont understand that China can retake TW just by bombing it. US troop in Okinawa will arrive to TW before China navy can step its foot to TW soil and push u back to the main land.

China only can take Senkaku, can not take TW or Okinawa. Ur army is incapable to do that China never have a single smart general in its history.

US will not send its soldiers to Taiwan, the modern warfare won't fight like that.

If China really decides to take on Taiwan, we will spare the normal citizens, but many flying drones will send there to hunt down those leaders and politicians.

China already gives Taiwan a deadline in 2020, if they don't wanna come back, then China will take it with military action.
 
Last edited:
.
Why not if US can send its troops to Afghan then why not lend a hand to an ally?

US will not send its soldiers to Taiwan, the modern warfare won't fight like that.

If China really decides to take on Taiwan, we will spare the normal citizens, but many flying drones will send there to hunt down those leaders and politicians.

China already gives Taiwan a deadline in 2020, if they don't wanna to come back, then China will take it with military action.
 
. . .
US will not send its soldiers to Taiwan, the modern warfare won't fight like that.

If China really decides to take on Taiwan, we will spare the normal citizens, but many flying drones will send there to hunt down those leaders and politicians.

China already gives Taiwan a deadline in 2020, if they don't wanna to come back, then China will take it with military action.
deadline in 2020 ?? oh and then people will see a China mass suicide around TW's water in 2020. U can not kill all TW leader coz US can find out hundred potential leaders for TW in the next day.

Sorry, China army is terrible weak, and its gens r not smart. U wanna suicide in 2020 ?? Oki, ur choice, but u never win. China win in Senkaku bcz Japan seem wanna disobey USA, so US have to teach Japan a lesson , thats how US train its dogs, thats all:pop:
 
.
No am not comparing Taliban with PLA, that's not even possible. But I think US would not miss this great opportunity of attacking China which is its competitor and BTW US and Japan have a treaty to help each other at the time of war. So I guess US will intervene.

Who they were fighting in Afghanistan? Just a bunch of primitive Talibans.

Do you think PLA is equivalent to Talibans?
 
.
deadline in 2020 ?? oh and then people will see a China mass suicide around TW's water in 2020. U can not kill all TW leader coz US can find out hundred potential leaders for TW in the next day.

Sorry, China army is terrible weak, and its gens r not smart. U wanna suicide in 2020 ?? Oki, ur choice, but u never win.:pop:

Taiwanese in the eyes of US are also just a bunch of Chinks. USA loves to see Chinks killing Chinks.

But for now, China is thousand times stronger than Taiwan, so this Chinks killing each other plan is not feasible, since China can easily crush Taiwan.

BTW, if the war ever outbreaks in the Asia-Pacific, the US will decide to retreat the supercarrier battlegroups from these zones, so forget about sending the ground troops to fight China. In their mind, to fight China on the ground is a nightmare.

silverbull3.jpg
 
.
deadline in 2020 ?? oh and then people will see a China mass suicide around TW's water in 2020. U can not kill all TW leader coz US can find out hundred potential leaders for TW in the next day.

Sorry, China army is terrible weak, and its gens r not smart. U wanna suicide in 2020 ?? Oki, ur choice, but u never win. China win in Senkaku bcz Japan seem disobey USA, so US have to teach Japan a lesson , thats all:pop:

We were smart enough to crush the Japanese in WW2, crush the US & South Korea in the Korean War, crush the Indians in 1962, spank the Soviets in 1969, crush the hapless Vietnamese in 1974, 1979 and 1988.
 
.
Taiwanese in the eyes of US are also just a bunch of Chinks. USA loves to see Chinks killing Chinks.

But for now, China is thousand times stronger than Taiwan, so this Chinks killing each other plan is not feasible, since China can easily crush Taiwan.

BTW, if the war ever outbreaks in the Asia-Pacific, the US will decide to retreat the supercarrier battlegroups from these zones, so forget about sending the ground troops to fight China. In their mind, to fight China on the ground is a nightmare.
If the war outbreaks in the Asia-Pacific, then US will order Saudi Arabia stop selling oil to China and US also sink all China merchant ships passing Malacca and SCS(east sea). China will collapse like Japan in WW 2 bcz of shortage in oil and other raw material supply :pop:

We were smart enough to crush the Japanese in WW2, crush the US & South Korea in the Korean War, crush the Indians in 1962, spank the Soviets in 1969, crush the hapless Vietnamese in 1974, 1979 and 1988.
Oh, u lost in 1979 , 11 Chinese men were killed mercilessly in 1990 and ur generals dare not open a full investigation :pop:
Some Chinese soldiers called it a “painful, little war.” Vietnamese troops avoided battle and instead harassed PLA forces. Some Chinese officers described it as a “ghost war,” since the enemy troops were almost invisible, or a “shadow war,” since it seemed they were fighting against their own shadows. The Vietnamese troops employed the same tactics, made the same moves, and used the same weapons as the Chinese. They knew exactly what the Chinese were trying to do. They exploited almost every problem and weakness the Chinese had. The Chinese troops had to fight their own problems first before they could fight the Vietnamese. Deng’s border war taught the PLA a hard lesson….

Hanoi believed, however, that the Vietnamese army had taught the Chinese army a lesson. One [People's Army of Vietnam] general said that China lost militarily and beat a hasty retreat: “After we defeated them we gave them the red carpet to leave Vietnam.
What the PLA Learned in Vietnam, 1979 | Far Outliers
 
.
If the war outbreaks in the Asia-Pacific, then US will order Saudi Arabia stop selling oil to China and US also sink all China merchant ships passing Malacca and SCS(east sea). China will collapse like Japan in WW 2 bcz of shortage in oil and other raw material supply :pop:

A blockade against China will result China to sink their surface vessels, so they can only use the submarines to block China's oil route.

The USN will lose 10 supercarriers along with its 60,000 personnels, is that worthy?

Meanwhile, China has plenty of oil in Xinjiang, and also those in East/South China Sea, so we will never get starved by the oil.
 
Last edited:
.
A blockade against China will result China to sink their surface vessels, so they can only use the submarine to block China's oil route.

The USN will lose 10 supercarriers with 60,000 personnels, is that worthy?

Meanwhile, China has plenty of oil in Xinjiang, and also those in East/South China Sea, so we will never get starved by the oil.

China has massive strategic reserves for critical energy and raw materials. The PLA and the CPC has the war economy fully prepared for the absolute worst case scenario.
 
. .
A blockade against China will result China to sink their surface vessels, so they can only use the submarine to block China's oil route.

The USN will lose 10 supercarriers with 60,000 personnels, is that worthy?

Meanwhile, China has plenty of oil in Xinjiang, and also those in East/South China Sea, so we will never get starved by the oil.
U have to import 78 % of oil from Middle east , oil in Xinjiang is not enough for 1,3 billion Chinese :pop:
China became slightly more reliant on the Middle East in 2005 than it had been 10 years ago, with 47 per cent of its imports coming from the Persian Gulf. In addition, because China is now heavily reliant on Africa as well as the Middle East, it now depends more on a single chokepoint—the Strait of Malacca—than it had before, with nearly 77 per cent of its oil imports flowing through the strait. This situation remained unchanged in the following five years: China still imported 78 per cent of its crude from the Middle East and Africa in 2010 (BP 2011; Kennedy 2011).
'15. Why Are the Stakes So High?' in Rebalancing and Sustaining Growth in China by Huw McKay... | ANU Press

And for the "The USN will lose 10 supercarriers with 60,000 personnels" I have to say: pls dont listen to China's propaganda. China can not sink even a small US war ship now, so let alone the US super carriers. Fighting in real battle is so much different with what ur propagand bragging abt .
 
Last edited:
.
U have to import 78 % of oil from Middle east , oil in Xinjiang is not enough for 1,3 billion Chinese :pop:


And for the "The USN will lose 10 supercarriers with 60,000 personnels" I have to say: pls dont listen to China's propaganda. China can not sink even a small US war ship now, so let alone the US super carriers. Fighting in real battle is so much different with what ur propagande bragging abt .

The oil alone Xinjiang can feed us in the next 100 years. Meanwhile we will have Outer Mongolia in our bag.

Xinjiang has nearly 10 billion tons of oil, while Northeast China has discovered another oil field about 2 billion tons.

新疆油田7年累计探明石油地质储逾5亿吨
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom