China Reacts on India's Interceptor Test

[longlong]

First you mention PDV is not KKV, then point out it is not a good kkv system! Talk about oxymoron.

It's not a KKV. You read wrongly about "not a good kkv system".

Irrelevant. Proven and tested system.

That's important to estimate where the opponent did go.

Better performed - subjective. You have no idea about performance of any of the system. And then, you are comparing SAM to a 1 ton payload capable ballistic missile!

Where is the capable ballistic missile? Hope you're not drunk right now.

No ABM goes 2000 kms. And you don't need to have territory bigger than the range of missile - otherwise all Chinese intercontinental missiles are questionable, aren't they?

You read wrongly again. It's not 2000km range ABM, it's about the coming MRBM.

What they questioned was manoeuvring of target missile in attempts of evasion, not the ABM.

Totally negative. It's fully about your PDV.

Killer missile will maneuver only if target missile maneuvers else it will not maneuver Much.




Have you ever seen any Indian scientist reacting unnecessarily over any of Chinese missile test. On the contrary chinese experts always pop up with some opinion of China being ahead of India by few decades.

Your first flown J15 is batter than Sukhoi, Your J20 is batter than F22, your J 31 is batter than F 35 etc. etc.

We know that your all of chinese weapons are better than the best. So tell your your expert not to compare hi fi chinese technology with that of ours and let us test our toys.

We know very well where we are and where our adversaries are.

KKV had only been achieved by US and China.

It will take other nations at least another 15 years to achieve the above straight line.

 

[jarves]

2) Radar of PDV is from Russia, IR sensor are from Israel.

Can you tell me whatss this IR sensor you are talking about??

 

[longlong]

Can you tell me whatss this IR sensor you are talking about??

IR imaging sensor.

 

[Kloitra]

It's not a KKV. You read wrongly about "not a good kkv system".

There was no point of mentioning India's KKV ability than, cause it is not.

That's important to estimate where the opponent did go.

Doesn't tells you anything.

Where is the capable ballistic missile? Hope you're not drunk right now.

Read again - 1 ton capable - meaning able to carry one ton. You were comparing a ballistic missile with 1 ton load capacity with short range, small payload ABM systems and than claiming it is heavy!

And if you meant Prithvi is not capable missile, you need to stop smoking whatever you are.

You read wrongly again. It's not 2000km range ABM, it's about the coming MRBM.

Irrelevant. As I mentioned, you don't need to have territory bigger than the range of the missile, otherwise all Chinese ICBM are questionable.

Totally negative. It's fully about your PDV.

It is hard to school you. The Chinese commentator rightly said that the incoming target missile lacked ability of evasive manoeuvring, thus the capability of PDV to handle a manoeuvring target is doubtful.

 

[HariPrasad]

KKV had only been achieved by US and China.

See, you guys can say anything. How ever we get some insight of your weapons when none other that your own scientists expose your weapon. They have already done that in case of J15, J 31 and other Chinese weapon.

 

[jarves]

IR imaging sensor.

Its IIR not IR secondly give source for your claims that radar was from Russia and IIR seeker from Israel.

See, you guys can say anything. How ever we get some insight of your weapons when none other that your own scientists expose your weapon. They have already done that in case of J15, J 31 and other Chinese weapon.

Whats this KKV he is talking about??

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Whats this KKV he is talking about??

Kinetic Kill Vehicle.

 

[longlong]

There was no point of mentioning India's KKV ability than, cause it is not.


Doesn't tells you anything.


Read again - 1 ton capable - meaning able to carry one ton. You were comparing a ballistic missile with 1 ton load capacity with short range, small payload ABM systems and than claiming it is heavy!

I'm really confused if you are not so.
Didn't I compare your PDV vs THAAD, HQ-9? Where is the magic " a ballistic missile with 1 ton load capacity "?

Irrelevant. As I mentioned, you don't need to have territory bigger than the range of the missile, otherwise all Chinese ICBM are questionable.

China can easily achieve a 5000km route for ballistic missile launched from east to west.
Same case for US.
Russia can easily achieve ICBM test on their own land.

India has smaller territory and higher population density than above 3. You have no land to test ABM for ballistic missile achieved the distance and end speed, of course the detection without early warning.

It is hard to school you. The Chinese commentator rightly said that the incoming target missile lacked ability of evasive manoeuvring, thus the capability of PDV to handle a manoeuvring target is doubtful.

click

 

[jarves]

Kinetic Kill Vehicle.

So he is comparing an anti satelllite weapon system with anti ballistic missile system

 

[jarves]

I'm really confused if you are not so.
Didn't I compare your PDV vs THAAD, HQ-9? Where is the magic " a ballistic missile with 1 ton load capacity "?

What you are trying to say dude,say it clearly.WHy you are comparing PDV with HQ-9?? Both are of differenct class.

China can easily achieve a 5000km route for ballistic missile launched from east to west.
Same case for US.
Russia can easily achieve ICBM test on their own land.

Ok then please tell me how China tested missiles which can reach America??

click

You are giving a source of an artilce which is written in Chinese language

 

[GR!FF!N]

So he is comparing an anti satelllite weapon system with anti ballistic missile system

more likely,he's comparing a terminal ABM system with Mid course ABM System.they should compare it Israeli Arrow than US ThAAD.

@jarves

leave the confused guy alone.he has no idea about the difference between a SAM,a Terminal ABM and a Midcourse Intercept ABM. plus,he doesn't know various different approaches of destroying a BM.

 

[HariPrasad]

China can easily achieve a 5000km route for ballistic missile launched from east to west.
Same case for US.
Russia can easily achieve ICBM test on their own land.
India has smaller territory and higher population density than above 3. You have no land to test ABM for ballistic missile achieved the distance and end speed, of course the detection without early warning.

5000 Km Territory is not at all necessary to test a BMD capable of intercepting a 5000 KM Missile. What is needed is just a missile mimicking the trajectory and speed of target missile at intercepting altitude.

 

[longlong]

5000 Km Territory is not at all necessary to test a BMD capable of intercepting a 5000 KM Missile. What is needed is just a missile mimicking the trajectory and speed of target missile at intercepting altitude.

Things are not as you thought.

As having no enough space, your target missile had to fly curved as shown in purple. It's mountain different from the real world.

 

[Kloitra]

I'm really confused if you are not so.
Didn't I compare your PDV vs THAAD, HQ-9? Where is the magic " a ballistic missile with 1 ton load capacity "?

The 5000 kg weight you gave is not of PDV, but Prithvi ballistic missile, on which PDV is based on. It won't take more than a little common sense to know that a ballistic missile as a whole would not be used as an ABM but modified. Nor would you need its complete range or payload capacity. The weight for PDV is not known, but would not be equal to a ballistic missile its based on.

China can easily achieve a 5000km route for ballistic missile launched from east to west.
Same case for US.
Russia can easily achieve ICBM test on their own land.

India has smaller territory and higher population density than above 3. You have no land to test ABM for ballistic missile achieved the distance and end speed, of course the detection without early warning.

Ever heard of DF-5, 31 and 41? How did China achieved territory exceeding 10000 km? This is not how missiles are tested.
Besides, the exercise is done over ocean, and not land. As an example, for Agni 5 test:

On 19 April 2012 at 08.05 am, the Agni V was successfully test-fired by DRDO from Wheeler Island off the coast of Orissa.[20] The test launch was made from the Launch Complex 4 of the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Wheeler Island using a rail mobile launcher.[21] The flight time lasted 20 minutes and the third stage fired the re-entry vehicle into the atmosphere at an altitude of 100 kilometres (62 mi). The missile re-entry vehicle subsequently impacted the pre-designated target point more than 5,000 kilometres (3,100 mi) away in the Indian Ocean.

The article you quoted is in Chinese. I will use the OP as the reference and will try to explain again. The commentator said that the target missile lacked the capability for evasive manoeuvring and thus the ABM system's capability to handle such targets is doubtful.

 

[longlong]

more likely,he's comparing a terminal ABM system with Mid course ABM System.they should compare it Israeli Arrow than US ThAAD.

@jarves

leave the confused guy alone.he has no idea about the difference between a SAM,a Terminal ABM and a Midcourse Intercept ABM. plus,he doesn't know various different approaches of destroying a BM.

Had you destroyed?

The 5000 kg weight you gave is not of PDV, but Prithvi ballistic missile, on which PDV is based on. It won't take more than a little common sense to know that a ballistic missile as a whole would not be used as an ABM but modified. Nor would you need its complete range or payload capacity. The weight for PDV is not known, but would not be equal to a ballistic missile its based on.


Ever heard of DF-5, 31 and 41? How did China achieved territory exceeding 10000 km? This is not how missiles are tested.
Besides, the exercise is done over ocean, and not land. As an example, for Agni 5 test:


The article you quoted is in Chinese. I will use the OP as the reference and will try to explain again. The commentator said that the target missile lacked the capability for evasive manoeuvring and thus the ABM system's capability to handle such targets is doubtful.

China launched either from land to sea, or from sea to land.
This is the next step India need to go.