Let's see what my original point was about.
I said China being the largest solar market in the world will allow Chinese companies to survive. China will have about 5 big solar companies after the industry goes through a consolidation process. Smaller companies are either bought by bigger companies or they are allowed to go bankrupt. This is what happens to every mature industry.
Chinese solar companies are currently adjusting to supplying the Chinese market since they overproduced as they anticipated European demand to continue and didn't anticipate trade protectionism from Europe.
Chinese solar demand will continue to increase and it will be Chinese solar companies that will supply that demand.
If China didn't have solar demand, then China won't have solar companies as foreign markets will introduce trade protectionism to eliminate Chinese companies.
Europe failed in its goal to eliminate the Chinese solar industry. Europe thought that once they introduce trade protectionism that the Chinese solar companies would be liquidated and there won't be any competition for European solar companies. But China decided to expand its own solar demand which can compensate for European demand.
As TaiShang have pointed out, Chinese solar demand will increase enormously over the next few years.
Guess who will supply that demand?
Chinese companies
Not really. I have proven you in the very beginning based on survey from ministry of science - ICT & Future Planning, that there are still gaps in industrial technology between China and Korea, where Korea is ahead.
You prove nothing. Your denial is not evidence.
Really? which links? where?
This is my evidence, why QD is not as good as OLED:
This is why Quantum Dots aren’t quite as good as OLED in 4K TVs
However, where QD technology still falls way behind OLED is in how it represents black. In this, OLED truly shines and does so by not shining at all.
http://4k.com/news/why-quantum-dots-arent-quite-as-good-as-oled-5190/
Where is your evidence/link that prove the opposite?? I bet you will fail again.
Which one?
Why dont you answer my questions that I have been waiting for so long? You have many outstanding unanswered questions.
So your "evidence" is a biased survey done by South Korea? That's your "evidence"?
You really are a joke.
Read again the source I have given you.
These source are not from Korea:
This is why Quantum Dots aren’t quite as good as OLED in 4K TVs
Global OLED Market Expected to Reach $ 37.2 Billion by 2020
And those have busted your big mouth claiming that OLED has no future market, and QD is on par with OLED.
What is your evidence against them?
And the KIET source, yes it is from Korea, so what? Korean science ministry is still far far much more CREDIBLE than your big mouth.
You use Korean science ministry bragging a bunch of unproven claims as "evidence"?
I'd trust North Korean propaganda before I trust South Korean propaganda.
Compared to your propaganda (your empty claim) which one is more trustable?
Why you consider your empty claim as fact?
You keep reposting empty claim that is already busted with solid evidence above?
How stubborn you are.The evidence I gave you above has proven that your logic is false, or you are claiming based on LOGICAL FALLACY. Your empty claim cannot defeat EVIDENCE.
There is no evidence that OLED will loose out to QD. The evidence show the other way round.
OLED still has edge over QD => http://4k.com/news/why-quantum-dots-arent-quite-as-good-as-oled-5190/
OLED has very bright future. => http://www.lightnowblog.com/2015/12/global-oled-market-expected-to-reach-37-2-billion-by-2020/
How come product with bright future will loose out in the market? your logic doesnt work
You should place status of promotional technology to QD instead OLED.
There is no point arguing with you, because you are not ashamed humiliating your self by Reposting the claim that has been busted by solid evidence, even if the evidence has been repeated many times.
OK. Then tell me how much is QD market potential / share in 2020 based on market analyst?
I've asked you many times: what is the J20 question? and why dont you yourself anwser my question?
which is self humiliating yourself. 
You keep reposting the invalid argument.
Argument without evidence - simply by assumption, and busted repeatedly by my Solid Evidences.
Inability to counter evidence and reposting is a SIGN that you have failed and lost in wholde debate but stubborn.
Cheers for your losing and absolute defeat
LOL EU used trade protectionism after they saw Chinese solar companies grabbing market share from European companies. Europe wanted to protect its companies from going out of business as Chinese companies offered a similar technology at an affordable cost which consumers desire.
China has domestic steel companies as China has the largest steel market. Chinese steel suppliers supply that demand. There will always be Chinese steel companies.
China is doing the same thing for solar where previously China relied on foreign markets for the survival of its solar companies and was vulnerable to trade protectionism and decided to expand the domestic solar market. Guess who will supply that domestic solar demand? Chinese companies. So there will always be Chinese solar companies.
EU failed in its goal to eliminate the Chinese solar companies.
