What's new

China Radio's Tamil station to launch FM channel in India

I know the state govts pay taxes to the Central indian govt, going by your warped logic, the states are independent like the Princely states under the British rule

What an Idiot comparing the princely states to an federal set up :hitwall:
 
Columbus was ignorant and you are proud of his blunder . where is the term Indian or Hindu mentioned in your so-called "ancient books" ? If you cant show any documentary evidence, swallow your pride.

India/Hindu were labels given to you by the great Muslim conquerors and re-instated by the Brits and now you are proud of your fake identity !!!

'India' was the name by which Indian subcontinent was known in the west for thousands of years...right from the time Alexander the great defeated Persian empire and first crossed the Hindu Kush mountains to mount a campaign into India.

Locals called this land as Bharat..based on ancient Hindu Scriptures.

Persians called this land as Hindustan.(ie. land of Hindus)

Today all these names are in common use ..India is both known as Bharat and Hindustan.

BTW Columbus discovered America and named people living their as Indians(ie he was already searching for a sea route to India, a name already in common use back then'..long before any Britisher stepped into Indian subcontinent.. there by your theory of 'India' being a British creation fails across the board!!
 
What an Idiot comparing the princely states to an federal set up :hitwall:


Who gives a damn to your fake "set up" of a fake country created by the British with a 50 ++ yrs history. The fact is the states govts pay taxes to the Central Indian govt amd have have their own administration. Queen Victoria has bee replaced Italian Queen Sonia Manio and Mysore Maharaja , replaced by Siddharamaih Maharaja of the Italian Raj ,
 
hard evidence, no hints , if you cant produce hard evidence then stop trolling and get a life

No need to take account of the "hard evidence", since it doesn't change the fact that his logic is wrong.
 
Who gives a damn to your fake "set up" of a fake country created by the British with a 50 ++ yrs history. The fact is the states govts pay taxes to the Central Indian govt amd have have their own administration. Queen Victoria has bee replaced Italian Queen Sonia Manio and Mysore Maharaja , replaced by Siddharamaih Maharaja of the Italian Raj ,

Cry baby Cry. In 1947, foreigners said, a country as diverse as India , cannot survive, and will collapse like soviet union. We stood.
In 1980's, they said the same. We did the economic reforms, and still we survive.
In 2013 also people will say, and still we will survive and prosper and give a __I__ to those again.
 
'India' was the name by which Indian subcontinent was known in the west for thousands of years...right from the time Alexander the great defeated Persian empire and first crossed the Hindu Kush mountains to mount a campaign into India.

Locals called this land as Bharat..based on ancient Hindu Scriptures.

Persians called this land as Hindustan.(ie. land of Hindus)

Today all these names are in common use ..India is both known as Bharat and Hindustan.

BTW Columbus discovered America and named people living their as Indians(ie he was already searching for a sea route to India, a name already in common use back then'..long before any Britisher stepped into Indian subcontinent.. there by your theory of 'India' being a British creation fails across the board!!

The fact in there is no such country called India, ever mentioned in any of your ancient books , it was a name given by the Persians (plus Hindu -kafir) , used by Columbus and borrowed by the British to name their new colony. But the fact is there wasn't such a country called India, out of geographical ignorance the westerns called the land mass India, similar to Indians calling them mlecchas , a derogatory term. but you take great pride in that label as it was given to you the white man.
 
Cry baby Cry. In 1947, foreigners said, a country as diverse as India , cannot survive, and will collapse like soviet union. We stood.
In 1980's, they said the same. We did the economic reforms, and still we survive.
In 2013 also people will say, and still we will survive and prosper and give a __I__ to those again.

cant predict that mate... But your recently Central govt commissioned Chennai Airport using Tamilnadu state taxes had collapsed, next to go is your Kudankulam neuclear plant and dont say we foreigners didn't warn you

airport2_1456122g.jpg
 
No need to take account of the "hard evidence", since it doesn't change the fact that his logic is wrong.

their logic is based on myths - fabricated myths , written as recent as 500 AD but they claim it was 5000 BC, just wait and see they will claim the Mahabharat was written in 4000 BC by a certain Alien oops Aryan God .:rofl:
 
The fact in there is no such country called India, ever mentioned in any of your ancient books ,

How dumb does a person have to be not able comprehend simple English!!
I have clearly mentioned, India is know as Bharat which is name from ancient Indian scriptures.


it was a name given by the Persians (plus Hindu -kafir) ,

Since when does Hindu relate to Kafir? Kafir is an Islamic term for a non-bilever..the Persian word Hindu predates Islam by many centuries.

used by Columbus and borrowed by the British to name their new colony. But the fact is there wasn't such a country called India, out of geographical ignorance the westerns called the land mass India, similar to Indians calling them mlecchas , a derogatory term. but you take great pride in that label as it was given to you the white man.


Again you have proving yourself to be a total doofus..

India was the common name for this landmass through out Europe(mostly Christian Kingdoms)..just like 'Hindustan' was the common name for the landmass in Islamic countries...for centuries before even the first European set out at sea looking for a trade route to India.
India had well established trade contacts(land based) with countries to its west..through which a word of mouth spread about India a land of untold riches(In medieval period India use to account for 1/4 th of the world's GDP.) Which is why Europeans set sail looking for sea route to India in first place.
 
How dumb does a person have to be not able comprehend simple English!!
I have clearly mentioned, India is know as Bharat which is name from ancient Indian scriptures.


The question is not on what was India known in your mythological scriptures which you boldly proclaim as "Indian scriptures" . These scriptures are mere granny tales where the pigs can fly. Its solely meant for Hindoo consumption. We need historical data and facts, not crap scriptures which has been fabricated and manufactured by Hindoo terrorist brigade.

My point is the name Hindia and Hindoo is Persian in origin which was modified by your colonial masters to India. Theres no such a country called India or a religion , Hindoo in the Indian scripture.

Since when does Hindu relate to Kafir? Kafir is an Islamic term for a non-bilever..the Persian word Hindu predates Islam by many centuries.

The Arabs , Turks and the rest of your invaders borrowed Hindoo / Hind from Persian and to the Muslim Arabs/Turks /Mughals Hindoo is equivalent to kafir or idol worshipers and you are proud of the Persian label.

Again you have proving yourself to be a total doofus..

India was the common name for this landmass through out Europe(mostly Christian Kingdoms)..just like 'Hindustan' was the common name for the landmass in Islamic countries...for centuries before even the first European set out at sea looking for a trade route to India.
India had well established trade contacts(land based) with countries to its west..through which a word of mouth spread about India a land of untold riches(In medieval period India use to account for 1/4 th of the world's GDP.) Which is why Europeans set sail looking for sea route to India in first place.

Dear Indian Hindoo, am not in need of any labeling from an idol worshiper

If you make a tall and pompous claim you need to post the relevant source as supportive evidence ,independent verifiable source outside your Hindoo myths oops "Ancient Indian books" If you traded with the Arabs , Greeks, Romans and Chinese etc, you need to quote from these sources and what your Hindustan stand for whether its the entire sub continent or just the land mass across the Indus river aka now Pakistan. So get your terms of references and independent sources to support your pompous claims.

to the rest of the Indian terror brigade, I am still waiting for


1) when was the Mahabharat written
2) who wrote the Mahabharat
3) produce the written text evidence from the Mahabharat where China is mention , thanks
 
1) when was the Mahabharat written
The origins of the epic probably fall between the 8th and 9th centuries BC.
2) who wrote the Mahabharata
Sant Ved Vyasa

3) produce the written text evidence from the Mahabharat where China is mention , thanks

China is mentioned as one among the northerm kingdoms: Mahabharata, Book 6, chapter 9 (MBh.6.9) mentions like this: - Among the tribes of the north are the Mlecchas , and the Kruras, the Yavanas , the Chinas , the Kamvojas, the Darunas, and many Mleccha tribes; the Sukritvahas, the Kulatthas, the Hunas, and the Parasikas; the Ramanas, and the Dasamalikas. Chinas were mentioned along with Chivukas and Pulindas and Khasas , Hunas, Pahlavas, Sakas , Yavanas, Savaras, Paundras , Kiratas , Kanchis , Dravidas, Sinhalas and Keralas .

All these tribes were described as Mlechha tribes. Here they were described as the protectors of sage Vasistha and his cow against the attack of king Viswamitra .
 
On topic, I think its the CPCs way of increasing/countering gesture among Tamilians, if anyone is not aware the very recent Indian movies who portray china as enemy are Coming out of Tamil film industries.. :P
 
The origins of the epic probably fall between the 8th and 9th centuries BC.

Sant Ved Vyasa



China is mentioned as one among the northerm kingdoms: Mahabharata, Book 6, chapter 9 (MBh.6.9) mentions like this: - Among the tribes of the north are the Mlecchas , and the Kruras, the Yavanas , the Chinas , the Kamvojas, the Darunas, and many Mleccha tribes; the Sukritvahas, the Kulatthas, the Hunas, and the Parasikas; the Ramanas, and the Dasamalikas. Chinas were mentioned along with Chivukas and Pulindas and Khasas , Hunas, Pahlavas, Sakas , Yavanas, Savaras, Paundras , Kiratas , Kanchis , Dravidas, Sinhalas and Keralas .

All these tribes were described as Mlechha tribes. Here they were described as the protectors of sage Vasistha and his cow against the attack of king Viswamitra .

Mlechha is such a weird cacophonous word. Definitely an onomatopoeia and not a proper formed word in Sanskrit.
 
Back
Top Bottom