China puts missiles back on contested South China Sea island as United States pushes allies for bigg

[Place Of Space]

We can deploy weapons to our territory at any time in any grade, China has not signed any agreement with other nations for restraining forces deployment in SCS isands.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Correct, in 1958 TW conflict, US slaughtered completely PLA troops with zero US troop lost. Curren PLA army is just a shame now wt full of corrupted generals and soldier who have Zero combat experience and just join PLA for good salary, not for defending the nation.

We learn to fight with zero casualty as 1988, it was a massacre of Viets in the reefs

If a conflict at SCS starts China will win the first battle but then the US navy will have the excuse to crush the Chinese navy.

We all know US is trying to make provocation and to induce an excuse to have a naval battle against China since they still hold the military superiority but China is not stupid, it will fight when it's ready unless US want to try the first shot.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I belive what a commi says

Sure, then why don't you give us your explanation as for why the missiles are back on the islands?

 

[oprih]

Another big disappoinment for the american bootlickers.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

Haha cheerleaders...they are on fast now they will come out with their pompom after 16th june

hide ur ladies we will launch new love jihad offences after eid ..

If a conflict at SCS starts China will win the first battle but then the US navy will have the excuse to crush the Chinese navy.

and that is why usa "indirectly"begging others (japan,Australia ) to form an alliance against China ?
usa took whole nato to fight saddam . i dont think they will go alone to fight China .
to destroy PLAN usa have to put all of their naval power .

Russian involvement is highly possible (as they cant afford to lose an ally like China).

i know the technical advantages of usn but u cant neglect the fact that China could hit them from their mainland too.

 

[Beast]

Sure, then why don't you give us your explanation as for why the missiles are back on the islands?

He will claim it's becos from the US permission that the Chinese missile are allowed to be back. This kind of idiot will say whatever face saving to fit their US master.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

He will claim it's becos from the US permission that the Chinese missile are allowed to be back. This kind of idiot will say whatever face saving to fit their US master.

So according to their own logic, the USA actually wants China to put missiles on these islands. How can they contradict the wishes of their master?

 

[Viva_Viet]

China's army and the navy are not same. The Chinese army is way more capable than the navy. Matter of fact the Chinese army is China's pride. The Chinese army is to China what the US navy is to the US. On the the other hand, if you consider the capabilities and merit the Chinese navy is more like the US army. Since the battle will be fought at sea the US will enjoy a huge advantage with her technologically advanced naval assets as well as highly skilled and experienced sailors.



I always say 'hope for the best but prepare for the worst'. Confidence is good but overconfidence brings about doom.

I mean :current PLA is a Shameful force wt full of corrupted generals and soldier who have Zero combat experience and just join PLA for good salary, not for defending the nation.

PLAN surely is just like ducks and USN always can enjoy good hunting time like what US did to JP navy in WW2.

 

[beijingwalker]

I mean :current PLA is a Shameful force wt full of corrupted generals and soldier who have Zero combat experience and just join PLA for good salary, not for defending the nation.

PLAN surely is just like ducks and USN always can enjoy good hunting time like what US did to JP navy in WW2.

If it is such an easy game as you claim, what stops US from attacking for such a long time, how long have to wait for this waiting game anyway?

 

[Viva_Viet]

If it is such an easy game as you claim, what stops US from attacking for such a long time, how long have to wait for this waiting game anyway?

U know why JP attack US, instead US attack JP first while US is much stronger than JP in WW2 ??

 

[beijingwalker]

U know why JP attack US, instead US attack JP first while US is much stronger than JP in WW2 ??

Why we need to attack US? US buys a lot of our stuff and is one of our biggest customers. Why do we have to beat a cow from which we are happily milking?

 

[Viva_Viet]

Why we need to attack US? US buys a lot of our stuff and is one of our biggest customers. Why do we have to beat a cow from which we are happily milking?

U always try to avoid what happening in Real life (US slap more tariff on CN, TPP also shrink CN market and make millions Cnese lose jobs). so, I have nothing else to say.

So, just wait till 2023.

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

U always try to avoid what happening in Real life (US slap more tariff on CN, TPP also shrink CN market and make millions Cnese lose jobs). so, I have nothing else to say.

So, just wait till 2023.

Wait till 2030 when China
is the number 1 and say this again Vn monkeys!

 

[T-Rex]

and that is why usa "indirectly"begging others (japan,Australia ) to form an alliance against China ?
usa took whole nato to fight saddam . i dont think they will go alone to fight China .
to destroy PLAN usa have to put all of their naval power .

That is the US strategy for a good reason but it does not mean militarily the US needs them.

Russian involvement is highly possible (as they cant afford to lose an ally like China).

Russian involvement will be limited to moral support, take my word for it.

i know the technical advantages of usn but u cant neglect the fact that China could hit them from their mainland too.

Hitler could not complete his victory in Europe for the narrow English Channel. China will face the same challenge. Only this time the channel is a thousand mile wide. For China it will be like fighting a crocodile in water. It's not a good idea.

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

That is the US strategy for a good reason but it does not mean militarily the US needs them.



Russian involvement will be limited to moral support, take my word for it.



Hitler could not complete his victory in Europe for the narrow English Channel. China will face the same challenge. Only this time the channel is a thousand mile wide. For China it will be like fighting a crocodile in water. It's not a good idea.

CHINA will never fire firstly!
Take my words even that means PLA personel shot to death or deadly wounded!

You compare HITER to china shows that you know nothing about china, you are still using western vision to review china,you must do not understand why a communiat party china has high tech companies like huawei,alibaba and wechat!