What's new

China pulls BBC World News off air for serious content violation

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
China's broadcasting regulator on Thursday made an announcement on pulling BBC World News off the air in the country for serious content violation.

The National Radio and Television Administration (NRTA) said BBC World News was found to have seriously violated regulations on radio and television management and on overseas satellite television channel management in its China-related reports, which went against the requirements that news reporting must be true and impartial, and undermined China's national interests and ethnic solidarity.

"As the channel fails to meet the requirements to broadcast in China as an overseas channel, BBC World News is not allowed to continue its service within Chinese territory. The NRTA will not accept the channel's broadcast application for the new year," the regulator said in a statement.

Source(s): Xinhua News Agency

 
. . .
China is going down day by day into a old style closed off security state.
Concentration camps, no freedom of speech, no elections , expansionist regime, etc.
I worry for my Chinese peers here.
 
.
Cowards. Afraid of the truth.

It is funny you did not accused the UK government of being a coward, afraid of the truth when they banned China CGTN over the air a couple of days ago.

What China did in retaliation is a matter of right and is expected.

UK in their arrogance forgot China is not Somalia or Sudan where they can bully without fear of any retaliation. That is the mindset of the former Colonialist and I guess it is stuck in the minds of the Master as well as the former slaves.
:sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
 
. .
It's funny, that China doesn't have a centralized news narrative coordination agency, like in the West.

To ban reporters to follow or "copy-paste" the news narrative from foreign countries.

For the same news, reporters should investigate by themselves and having their own narrative from what they found based on China's perspective.


In my opinion, based on my own observation and experience, the media in third world countries and China are freer and subjective compare to the West.

It covers news from many different perspectives, narratives, and sources.

But we don't brag with "free media", "free speech", etc like those in the West.

Western media has too many Cold War propaganda labels to fool people who don't aware of reality.
 
Last edited:
. .
UK draws the first blood banning CGTN, China's response was expected. I hope BBC is banned in Macao and Hong Kong as well.

Also noted that BBC's daily attack on Xinjiang issues was not picked up by CNN and Bloomberg, may be CNN and Bloomberg took a hinge from Biden trying to cool down the heated conflict between US and China.

Biden did not labeled China as enemy (Trump did) but rather a fierce competitor.

UK is now acting like US under Trump.
 
.
It's funny, that China doesn't have a centralized news narrative coordination agency, like in the West.

To ban reporters to follow or "copy-paste" the news narrative from foreign countries.

For the same news, reporters should investigate by themselves and having their own narrative from what they found based on China's perspective.


In my opinion, based on my own observation and experience, the media in third world countries and China are freer and subjective from the West.

It covers news from many different perspectives, narratives, and sources.

But we don't brag with "free media", "free speech", etc like those in the West.

Western media has too many Cold War propaganda labels to fool people who don't aware of reality.

Western mainstream media are extensions of Western intelligence agencies. The media are the propaganda arms of their intelligence agencies.
 
.
UK draws the first blood banning CGTN, China's response was expected. I hope BBC is banned in Macao and Hong Kong as well.

Also noted that BBC's daily attack on Xinjiang issues was not picked up by CNN and Bloomberg, may be CNN and Bloomberg took a hinge from Biden trying to cool down the heated conflict between US and China.

Biden did not labeled China as enemy (Trump did) but rather a fierce competitor.

UK is now acting like US under Trump.
Bbc is a pure propaganda unit , just like all the Chinese government mouthpieces like GT and cgtn.
CNN is more neutral though trump is their blind spot. No objectivety in his case.
 
.
03cd17bd-1aee-4bf0-80f4-030f44a27549.jpg

How does the BBC apply "results before evidence" principles when reporting on China? Graphic: Xu Zihe, Feng Qingyin/GT
 
.
Western mainstream media are extensions of Western intelligence agencies. The media are the propaganda arms of their intelligence agencies.

I agree with it.

Based on my observation...

It's funny to see, a conflict between USA and China, it's the USA's problem, but France24, DW, BBC, etc are reporting based on USA narrative, like the USA's problem is their problem.

Yup, they are not reporting based on their own interest and perspective, but on behave of the master.


The so-called free people of freedom and democracy can't do anything about it.

A fine example is in Trump's case.

How the media since the beginning is badmouthing and slandering Trump all the time until the FAKE NEWS slogan becomes popular.

And finally, in the end, Trump supporter protest is downplayed.

The USA media, who are you anyway???
 
Last edited:
.
China shows zero tolerance for fake news by banning BBC World News

By
Yu Ning
Published: Feb 12, 2021

China has sent the outside world a clear signal that it has zero tolerance for fake news Friday by barring BBC World News from airing in China. The decision comes as no surprise. According to the National Radio and Television Administration, BBC World News has been banned as some BBC's reports on China infringed the principles of truthfulness and impartiality in journalism.

For quite a while, BBC has been no longer a news organization that upholds objective reporting, but has degraded into a rumor mill with no bottom line. It’s fair to say it has become a vanguard in the West in concocting and spreading rumors and lies about China. BBC also views almost everything concerning China with double standards. And now, it is paying the price for what it has done.

Let’s have a look at how BBC twists facts and fabricates stories about China. It portrayed Hong Kong street violence as a "pro-democracy" movement, and to a certain extent, even glorified rioters and their violence. After US President Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6, BBC reporters including Grace Tsoi who defended the Hong Kong rioters rushed to criticize US rioters, vividly showing what double standard is.


In a recent article, it accused China’s measures that encourage people to stay put to celebrate the Lunar New Year, which is not mandatory, of being a “clampdown” on Chinese people, not to mention its many reports that smeared China’s lockdown measures as suppression of human rights after the epidemic broke out in China last year.

It stooped to a new low earlier this month when it published a sensational story alleging Uygur women were "systematically raped, sexually abused, and tortured" in the vocational education and training centers in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, only citing oral dictations of individual Uygur women without any verification. Is this what a media supposed to report on facts and truths should do? Where are BBC reporters’ news ethics?

BBC is carrying out a public opinion crusade against China. It has become a propaganda tool for secessionist and separatist forces of China, threatening China’s national security with false reports
. In order to serve those secessionists, it has taken a preset position to make selective reports, degrading into a rumor mill. Given such, China has every reason to take actions against it. China’s punishment on the British broadcaster is reasonable. If we don’t respond, it will mean we tolerate anyone to discredit us in this way. China must teach BBC a lesson.

It must be pointed out that banning BBC World News has nothing to do with freedom of the press. Does the so-called freedom of the press the West advocates mean media outlets are free to produce lies and launch politically motivated suppression against a target while being immune from any punishments? If so, China doesn’t need such freedom of the press. The Western media has no moral high ground to criticize China over freedom of the press.

China is not as bad as BBC has portrayed. Just make a comparison of the performances of China and the UK in face of the pandemic. Those BBC reporters who portrayed China as “a living hell” while fabricating the West as “a paradise for human rights” should feel ashamed of themselves. The reality is, some British people who evacuated from China to the UK last year after the outbreak of the epidemic are wishing they would have stayed in China.

Because of its false reports and smears against China, BBC’s credibility is declining sharply with Chinese people. Quite a few Chinese people now feel disdain for the broadcaster. BBC’s reports on China’s epidemic prevention and Xinjiang in particular often draw ridicule from China’s netizens.

BBC has chosen to be a rumormonger against China, then it has to bear the consequences.

 
. .
Back
Top Bottom