China preparing for war. Moving 1000s of missiles

[Liaslia]

Not truth, some are making billion out of this pandemic. The only loser will be peasant like us.

Wellness industry (cruise ships, vacations, air travel etc..) was $680 billion in 2018. Now all the airports are closed since February 2020

 

[Liaslia]

Did you see that ?

 

[casual]

1000 or 2000 SAM missiles or Chinese S-400

Ya, you can't bomb anyone with SAMs. SAMs are there to protect you from getting bombed. See the distinction?

 

[52051]

Are you completely ignorant? Where do you get the idea that Taiwanese generals are pro-unification? Did you speak to one and he told you that?

The problem with your nutjobness about nuking Taiwan is that nobody will take you seriously, this is my last reply to you, I don't have much time to waste on a nuke keyboard nutjob anymore, sorry.

As for KMT generals that support reunification with PRC, well, in active duty of cause they could not openly told that due to pressure from media may cause them to lose their jobs.

But there are still many retired KMT generals here and there, some even join PRC's reunification events:

统一时刻即将到来：大批台湾现役军官投奔大陆

统一时刻即将到来：大批台湾现役军官投奔大陆

www.longzhidui.com

台湾统派人士和退役将领参加黄帝故里拜祖大典_本网快讯_中国台湾网

4月12日上午，“癸巳年黄帝故里拜祖大典”在河南新郑举行。

www.taiwan.cn

台军退役上将公开表示“不再反共”，遭绿营围攻_中华网

资料图：许历农【环球网军事9月5日报道环球时报驻台北特约记者李名】曾宣扬中共为“三合一敌人”的台湾退役上将许历农发表公开信，说明他“不再反共”的理由，遭到绿营围攻

3g.china.com

That's why current Taiwan ruling party don't trust Taiwan's armed force, according to Cai Yingwen herself:

è¡è±æ称å°ååæ°è¿åä¸äº² å½æ°åæ¹ï¼å¥¹æ¯å°æ¹¾æ大æ人_åé

æ®å°æ¹¾ãä¸æ¶çµåæ¥ã6æ10æ¥æ¥éï¼è§é¢æ¾ç¤ºï¼è¡è±æå¨ä¸æ£µå¤§æ ä¸å¯¹æ°ä¼è¡¨ç¤ºï¼ä»¥åçåéåæ°è¿åæ¯è¾ä¸äº²ï¼å 为å½æ°åæ§æ¿è¿ä¹ä¹ï¼ä»ä»¬é½åå½æ°åå¨ä¸èµ·ã æ´ªå楷å¨è¸ä¹¦åæååºç§°ï¼è¡è±æ身为å°æ¹¾å°åºé¢å¯¼äººâ¦

www.sohu.com

The military balance or rather the military inbalance between PRC and Tawian is so one-sided, let along the fighting will, there is absolutely little point to drop nuke on Taiwan, in case of China-US war over Taiwan, again China will drop nuke on US or Japland if the war has gone all the way to a nuke one.

Please stop your nutjobness and fake toughness, you are out of your mind and make a joke out of yourself.

 

[Feng Leng]

The problem with your nutjobness about nuking Taiwan is that nobody will take you seriously, this is my last reply to you, I don't have much time to waste on a nuke keyboard nutjob anymore, sorry.

As for KMT generals that support reunification with PRC, well, in active duty of cause they could not openly told that due to pressure from media may cause them to lose their jobs.

But there are still many retired KMT generals here and there, some even join PRC's reunification events:

统一时刻即将到来：大批台湾现役军官投奔大陆

统一时刻即将到来：大批台湾现役军官投奔大陆

www.longzhidui.com

台湾统派人士和退役将领参加黄帝故里拜祖大典_本网快讯_中国台湾网

4月12日上午，“癸巳年黄帝故里拜祖大典”在河南新郑举行。

www.taiwan.cn

台军退役上将公开表示“不再反共”，遭绿营围攻_中华网

资料图：许历农【环球网军事9月5日报道环球时报驻台北特约记者李名】曾宣扬中共为“三合一敌人”的台湾退役上将许历农发表公开信，说明他“不再反共”的理由，遭到绿营围攻

3g.china.com

That's why current Taiwan ruling party don't trust Taiwan's armed force, according to Cai Yingwen herself:

è¡è±æ称å°ååæ°è¿åä¸äº² å½æ°åæ¹ï¼å¥¹æ¯å°æ¹¾æ大æ人_åé

æ®å°æ¹¾ãä¸æ¶çµåæ¥ã6æ10æ¥æ¥éï¼è§é¢æ¾ç¤ºï¼è¡è±æå¨ä¸æ£µå¤§æ ä¸å¯¹æ°ä¼è¡¨ç¤ºï¼ä»¥åçåéåæ°è¿åæ¯è¾ä¸äº²ï¼å 为å½æ°åæ§æ¿è¿ä¹ä¹ï¼ä»ä»¬é½åå½æ°åå¨ä¸èµ·ã æ´ªå楷å¨è¸ä¹¦åæååºç§°ï¼è¡è±æ身为å°æ¹¾å°åºé¢å¯¼äººâ¦

www.sohu.com

The military balance or rather the military inbalance between PRC and Tawian is so one-sided, let along the fighting will, there is absolutely little point to drop nuke on Taiwan, in case of China-US war over Taiwan, again China will drop nuke on US or Japland if the war has gone all the way to a nuke one.

Please stop your nutjobness and fake toughness, you are out of your mind and make a joke out of yourself.

LOL did you even read what you posted? It says plainly in the article you posted that DPP already purged the Taiwan military of any anti-separatist forces.

她提到台军时称“过去都和国民党在一起”、“和民进党不亲”，并称自己上台后和军方“沟通、合作”，“现在军队已经和‘我们’一样同心”。

Please get your facts straight before making claims.

There is nothing unusual about using nuclear warheads in a war. That is what they are intended to do. You are categorically ruling out using nukes on Taiwan because of sentimental reasons. There is no reason to be sentimental. When Taiwan needs to be subdued within minutes, nukes are the way to go.

 

[Figaro]

LOL did you even read what you posted? It says plainly in the article you posted that DPP already purged the Taiwan military of any anti-separatist forces.

她提到台军时称“过去都和国民党在一起”、“和民进党不亲”，并称自己上台后和军方“沟通、合作”，“现在军队已经和‘我们’一样同心”。

Please get your facts straight before making claims.

There is nothing unusual about using nuclear warheads in a war. That is what they are intended to do. You are categorically ruling out using nukes on Taiwan because of sentimental reasons. There is no reason to be sentimental. When Taiwan needs to be subdued within minutes, nukes are the way to go.

Using nuclear warheads should not be the way to go in any kind of war, let alone a war between two same ethnicities. After all, aren't most Taiwanese Han Chinese anyway? And since China claims Taiwan to be a province, wouldn't dropping a nuke on it be equivalent to dropping a nuke on its own people? A country with the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world should be responsible with it; you do not need a nuke to destroy C4ISR centers.

 

[zectech]

Please stop your nutjobness and fake toughness,

You need the good cop bad cop approach. Trouble is the US has 5 different ways to destroy ICBMs, at launch, to near impact. US probably has more than 5 different ways to destroy Chinese nukes if ever launched. And China has 0 ways to defend from a nuke attack.

So the US wants to call the bluff of China nuking by do what Washington always wanted to do - nuke China. They wanted to nuke Iran, however Iran does not have nukes, therefore their missile strikes in the ME can't be mistaken for nukes. Iran can't be nuked without repercussions. If Iran were to get nukes, their ballistic missiles would be useless, Washington or Israhell would take an incoming missile strike as hostile nuke and respond.

You want Taiwan to be "free and democratic", so if China ever loses a war against the US, China can choose to be annexed by democratic Taiwan. With China getting majority voting. It is a great coup d 'etat against the West. So China does not end up like Japan, occupied.

Taiwan is the ace card, China holds, to preserve China in case of defeat.

There is no reason to want to retake Taiwan. China should make a deal to recognize Taiwan as not as Republic of China, as the Republic of Taiwan, while China get 5 nm technology for chips.

 

[Feng Leng]

Using nuclear warheads should not be the way to go in any kind of war, let alone a war between two same ethnicities. After all, aren't most Taiwanese Han Chinese anyway? And since China claims Taiwan to be a province, wouldn't dropping a nuke on it be equivalent to dropping a nuke on its own people? A country with the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world should be responsible with it; you do not need a nuke to destroy C4ISR centers.

The most responsible thing to do with nuclear weapons is to use it on China's enemies. Taiwan separatists are China's enemy. A surprise nuclear strike wiping out the DPP senior leadership is far more humane than any other option. It allows Taiwan to voluntarily surrender without further bloodshed.

 

[casual]

The most responsible thing to do with nuclear weapons is to use it on China's enemies. Taiwan separatists are China's enemy. A surprise nuclear strike wiping out the DPP senior leadership is far more humane than any other option. It allows Taiwan to voluntarily surrender without further bloodshed.

Hell no. Just shut up with your nuking talk. China will not nuke unless she has been nuked first via no first use rule.

 

[Feng Leng]

Hell no. Just shut up with your nuking talk. China will not nuke unless she has been nuked first via no first use rule.

Are you even a Chinese citizen?

 

[Beast]

You need the good cop bad cop approach. Trouble is the US has 5 different ways to destroy ICBMs, at launch, to near impact. US probably has more than 5 different ways to destroy Chinese nukes if ever launched. And China has 0 ways to defend from a nuke attack.

You give too much respect to US nuke interception defense. There is no way to stop a sneaky DF-41 ICBM which can appear in anywhere of China and launch ICBM at US. US midcourse interception has a poor success rate. Worst of all, China can fit a DF-31A with hypersonic gliding warhead which is impossible to intercept becos u do not know where it enters the atmosphere and strike at where. Making any US ICBM early monitoring and warning system useless

 

[Beast]

Are you even a Chinese citizen?

China need not nuke Taiwan. Its precision strike Ballistic missile are enough to win war for PLA. But I agree the stupid Taiwan woman need to be shot.

 

[zectech]

You give too much respect to US nuke interception defense. There is no way to stop a sneaky DF-41 ICBM which can appear in anywhere of China and launch ICBM at US. US midcourse interception has a poor success rate. Worst of all, China can fit a DF-31A with hypersonic gliding warhead which is impossible to intercept becos u do not know where it enters the atmosphere and strike at where. Making any US ICBM early monitoring and warning system useless

I am referring to Goldeneye Satellites, cell phone towers or other electronic warfare for missile defense on various platforms for ICBM defense - speed of the incoming projectile does not matter, and classified missiles for air defense, not the crappy THUUD ADS.

China needs to develop their own nuke deliverance defenses and then realize US could have these. It makes using nukes against the US seem not smart.

 

[Beast]

I am referring to Goldeneye Satellites, cell phone towers or other electronic warfare for missile defense on various platforms for ICBM defense - speed of the incoming projectile does not matter, and classified missiles for air defense, not the crappy THUUD ADS.

Doesnt matter. Hyper glide nuke warhead is impossible to intercept. US always hype their early warning, tracking technology but behind that we all know their poor interception rate and work ability.

 

[casual]

I am referring to Goldeneye Satellites, cell phone towers or other electronic warfare for missile defense on various platforms for ICBM defense - speed of the incoming projectile does not matter, and classified missiles for air defense, not the crappy THUUD ADS.

China needs to develop their own nuke deliverance defenses and then realize US could have these. It makes using nukes against the US seem not smart.

you are reading too much into science fiction.