China Prepared to Settle India Border Dispute, Wang Says

[Jzaib]

I would be happy too but then no ISLAMIC republic of Kashmir ! no pakistani interference and then no indian interence it will isloated kingdom of kashmir ~ ! Nice for you right ?

but i know they will join us .. bcoz on our side ..people will vote for pakistan .. on ur side they will vote for independence or pro Pakistan .. most likely Pakistan will get it ..

 

[Raphael]

I'm not confident the border issue can be solved so easily. We're not wiling to give up South Tibet. The best we can do is freeze the issue, leave it for a later day to be resolved, so it doesn't impact bilateral ties too much.

Anyway, I don't see what's so bad about the current status-quo. We're not at war with each other, and we trade a lot. Sounds good to me.

 

[Aepsilons]

I'm not confident the border issue can be solved so easily. We're not wiling to give up South Tibet. The best we can do is freeze the issue, leave it for a later day to be resolved, so it doesn't impact bilateral ties too much.

In other words, pulling a Deng.

 

[PoKeMon]

Upto India? That is the real problem bro. We doesnt going to any give and take, you like it or not, and I can tell if China not able to solve border issue with India, it will be in another era of diplomacy crisis.

Its upto China now to accept the current border as International border, its upto you, otherwise India still have lot of cards to play, China cant sustain a pure anti-China.

Hold on. @Nan Yang is saying the same. Accept the status quo.

 

[kaku1]

I'm not confident the border issue can be solved so easily. We're not wiling to give up South Tibet. The best we can do is freeze the issue, leave it for a later day to be resolved, so it doesn't impact bilateral ties too much.

But it does matter in bigger course, I analyzed from Indian foreign policy that India still believe in China. I dont know why? And want to align with them.

Status quo, doesnt solve the problem, from fifty years from now on, we will be in same position from current one. But I afraid we not become enemy to each other.

 

[SAMEET]

ould try to become self-reliant in all fields instead of being dependent on other. to a great extent we have accomplished this, we have got the money and there is no deart

but i know they will join us .. bcoz on our side ..people will vote for pakistan .. on ur side they will vote for independence or pro Pakistan .. most likely Pakistan will get it ..

but what about kashmiri pandits and ladakhi people they want indian non islamic constitution not islamic constitution !

 

[kaku1]

Hold on. @Nan Yang is saying the same. Accept the status quo.

Nope if the border issue not solved, we finally have to decide our fate, we have to play our cards in South China Sea and with Japs.

 

[PoKeMon]

Of course, we will try to balance the feeling of Snnnis as much as we can. But also you should get rid of the judgement of either being our friend or enemy.

Unfortunately you can not, heck, no one can.

Just look at them, they find US the enemy of Islam and an attacker but still Arabs are biggest ally of US.

They find Israel an evil and a enemy of Islam, but they are not ashamed of getting aid from US (the strongest force behind Israel).

So much of hypocrisy.

And these BDeshis are least comprehensible. They keep on abusing the nation who got them freedom and a nation of themselves. They cant see beyond religion and that too from the lens of their section.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

It has potential to make the world multi polar, which I believe is good for the world. I think you meant this:
New World Order (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You see the West has systematically dismantled and colonized Muslim ruled areas and fragmented our states. Ever since Muslims appeared on world scene we have been their historic enemy. So they do not see logic in this. If they were logical in their approach, things would not turn out the way it did since 2001. Naturally we would like to see a player that do not have historical baggage with us. Chinese were never ruled by Muslims and so were Japanese. That is not the case with Russia or India. But China hopefully will be able to control anti-Muslim tendencies of Russia, we are hoping. India is whole another beast, no one knows them like we South Asian Muslims do.

In spite of the many greivances that you regularly air against the non Muslim West (and others), why you chose to emigrate to the USA is beyond me.

 

[PoKeMon]

Nope if the border issue not solved, we finally have to decide our fate, we have to play our cards in South China Sea and with Japs.

What rubbish.

He is saying let AP with India and Askai chin with China. You got a problem?

 

[kaku1]

What rubbish.

He is saying let AP with India and Askai chin with China. You got a problem?

Rofl, is thing solve border issue. Thats status quo, we have status quo with Pak too. But that solve your problem.

I think you didnt taking bigger picture, and considering the geopolitics.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Rofl, is thing solve border issue. Thats status quo, we have status quo with Pak too. But that solve your problem.

I think you didnt taking bigger picture, and considering the geopolitics.

Please stop vomitting.

 

[PoKeMon]

Rofl, is thing solve border issue. Thats status quo, we have status quo with Pak too. But that solve your problem.

I think you didnt taking bigger picture, and considering the geopolitics.

Can you write proper English, its getting hard to comprehend?

Status quo is keeping conflict alive, settling dispute is bringing the issue to an end.

What we are suggesting is using status quo positions for final settlement. If we go by this arrangement, India have to let go Askai chin and China have to let go AP. That formulate give and take.

 

[Jzaib]

but what about kashmiri pandits and ladakhi people they want indian non islamic constitution not islamic constitution !

Historical Demographics of Kashmir
In the 1901 Census of the British Indian Empire, the population of the princely state of Kashmir was 2,905,578. Of these 2,154,695 were Muslims, 689,073 Hindus, 25,828 Sikhs, and 35,047 Buddhists. The Hindus were found mainly in Jammu, where they constituted a little less than 50% of the population.[88] In the Kashmir Valley, the Hindus represented "only 524 in every 10,000 of the population (i.e. 5.24%), and in the frontier wazarats of Ladhakh and Gilgit only 94 out of every 10,000 persons (0.94%)."[88] In the same Census of 1901, in the Kashmir Valley, the total population was recorded to be 1,157,394, of which the Muslim population was 1,083,766, or 93.6% of the population


please see the high lighted part .. it was done in 1901 ... so it safe to say no pandits were forced out of kashmir them ... majority of population is kashmir .. if u combine budhhist, sikhs and hindus even then they are much less then muslims .. so should majority rules?? isnt it what democrazy is about .. muslims are in minority iun kashmir so had constition the way u like .. now in kashmir they are in majority .. so they should get what they are preffered.. indian memebers accuse that pandits are forced out so that how can the decision can be made without them .. 2 points i like to make here ... WHAT HAPPENED TO PANDITS IS BCOZ OF INDIA.. local population was forced to be in india, they took it out on pandits.. same thing happen in people who supported pakistan in 1971 .. they were butchered by banagaldesh.. now im trying to make a point .. when u take away their freedom, rape their women and kill their childern .. obviously they will hate india and their sympathisers ... Even if every pandits is reallocated still muslims are in majority, if any refrendum will take place muslims will be in big majority .., specially if u consider both indian and pakistan side of Kashmir

 

[kaku1]

Please stop vomitting.

Vomiting? Thats reality bro. And dont be naive now.

BTW, after the DBO incident, in PDF, people saying we have to join alliance, we have to join hand with Japs. I even told them, if the border issue is solved, then I think India and China can even create biggest alliance of world, and that change the whole shape of asia. But in between problem lies-- border issues.

But actually even now time is running out, we cannot remain non-allign for so long, we have to take some decisions.

Status quo is keeping conflict alive, settling dispute is bringing the issue to an end.

What we are suggesting is using status quo positions for final settlement. If we go by this arrangement, India have to let go Askai chin and China have to let go AP. That formulate give and take.

Yup that is what I taking about, convert the LAC as international border.