What's new

China opposes US withdrawal from INF Treaty

What way could you come out of today, enlighten me. which part of the warzone can you control aginst your main rival today, is it the airspace or ocean?Without this two, the war is literally over in modern warfare.:wave:
It is you that stuck in the past and in the jungle.
You and nonsense. What jungle? The US still flies B52 bombers close to China territory today that was used in the war. The nearly identical nuclear aircraft carriers, almost the same fighter jets, tanks, missiles, satellites etc. Ok today military hardware are more lethal. They look differently.
 
You and nonsense. What jungle? The US still flies B52 bombers close to China territory today that was used in the war. The nearly identical nuclear aircraft carriers, almost the same fighter jets, tanks, missiles, satellites etc. Ok today military hardware are more lethal. They look differently.
Modern warfare only means more lethal hardware?ok nvm, apperantly it is not you but the mankind has stall in the past half decade.
 
Last edited:
If you oppose the US deployment of medium range missiles why don’t Chinese stop such thing of your own? If I recall the PLA even bragged in one video, true or not, having deployed short range nuclear missiles to threaten Vietnam.

Haven’t you ever looked yourself into a mirror?

You probably recall wrong again (like you recalled wrong with explosive Samsung batteries). I do not remember such video. It simply does not make sense why China would bring nuclear weapons to the table with respect to the territorial disputes in the SCS.

It is very un-China.

So, check your sources again. It may as well be some rogue US army general bragging about US nuclear arsenal.

russia is no position to participate in nuclear arms race

Then you can have a sound sleep tonight because Russia cannot beat the US in militarization on borrowed money.

Ok then answer me this question:

Has China deployed short range nuclear missiles in the southern theater?

Yes or No?

This would never be confirmed because it is related to the ultimate national security. Anything told in terms of China's nuclear weapons is simply speculation.
 
What way could you come out of today, enlighten me. which part of the warzone can you control aginst your main rival today, is it the airspace or ocean?Without this two, the war is literally over in modern warfare.:wave:
It is you that stuck in the past and in the jungle.

War is a creative activity. With questions like "What way could you come out of today?", the last Chinese soldiers are only meat on the battlefield. Say China is just a tiger paper is not wrong.
 
War is a creative activity. With questions like "What way could you come out of today?", the last Chinese soldiers are only meat on the battlefield. Say China is just a tiger paper is not wrong.
:pop: Whatever floats your boat. :pop:
 
You probably recall wrong again (like you recalled wrong with explosive Samsung batteries). I do not remember such video. It simply does not make sense why China would bring nuclear weapons to the table with respect to the territorial disputes in the SCS.

It is very un-China.

So, check your sources again. It may as well be some rogue US army general bragging about US nuclear arsenal.



Then you can have a sound sleep tonight because Russia cannot beat the US in militarization on borrowed money.



This would never be confirmed because it is related to the ultimate national security. Anything told in terms of China's nuclear weapons is simply speculation.
Parts of faulty batteries were delivered by China manufacture. Yes that is un-China. That should never happen.

https://amp.theguardian.com/technol...ulty-batteries-galaxy-note-7-battery-supplier
 
Back
Top Bottom