China opposes Indian bid to supply submarine technology to T ..

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

India is playing with fires!

 

[Yaseen1]

china should openly provide advanced weapons to kashmir freedom fighters in response

 

[I S I]

Is Indian capable to export such high tech?

They invented one 5000 years ago to sail the vedic space. Modi ji inaugurated it in his last janam.

 

[Han Patriot]

this is our choice to sell tech to taiwan .

The point is you don't even make your own conventional submarines, there is only the Arihant and even that is semi floating junk. If Taiwan wants, they should buy from Germany or even Japan.

Coming from a self masturbating Indian newspaper.

 

[Areesh]

Nonsense. A famous example is that Chinese occupied Kashmir

He is not a Pakistani. I never seen a Pakistani who calls Aksai chin Chinese occupied Kashmir

Only one certain class of idiots are capable of saying that @Beast

 

[Jackdaws]

China can keep behaving like a teenage girl and throwing a fit. China doesn't matter.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

China can keep behaving like a teenage girl and throwing a fit. China doesn't matter.

That's all they know how to do. They cannot even build a road in Bhutan, so they build a road in their own territory to save face after getting humiliated by India.

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

That's all they know how to do. They cannot even build a road in Bhutan, so they build a road in their own territory to save face after getting humiliated by India.

You mean embarrassing and humiliating like below:
Sino-Indian War in 1962
Casualties and losses Source：Wikipedia
India =VS =China

1,383–3,250 killed =VS = 722 killed
548–1,047 wounded=VS =1,697 wounded
1,696 missing=VS =0
3,968 captured=VS =0

Casualties and losses Source：PLA Intl
India =VS =China

3,073–4,946 killed =VS = 722 killed
548–1,047 wounded=VS =1,697 wounded
3,968 captured=VS =0

 

[Cobra Arbok]

You mean embarrassing and humiliating like below:
Sino-Indian War in 1962
Casualties and losses Source：Wikipedia
India =VS =China

1,383–3,250 killed =VS = 722 killed
548–1,047 wounded=VS =1,697 wounded
1,696 missing=VS =0
3,968 captured=VS =0

Casualties and losses Source：PLA Intl
India =VS =China

3,073–4,946 killed =VS = 722 killed
548–1,047 wounded=VS =1,697 wounded
3,968 captured=VS =0

When did I mention 1962? Yes, China won against India with an army 7 times bigger. Big deal. China did get humiliated by india when it tried to capture Sikkim in 1967 though.

 

[GHALIB]

China can keep behaving like a teenage girl and throwing a fit. China doesn't matter.

That's true.

 

[Feng Leng]

this is our choice to sell tech to taiwan .

Then we will wipe you out with a nuclear strike!

 

[Feng Leng]

China can keep behaving like a teenage girl and throwing a fit. China doesn't matter.

So says a Gangedeshi on a Pakistan forum in a thread about China under the "China and Far East" section.

I am actually hoping this is true news not Gangedeshi mental masturbation (99% probability) because then Kashmir will be liberated!

 

[Tshering22]

BEIJING: China is ..

Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Seems more like an imaginary nonsense.

1. We are bound by MTCR not to share nuclear submarine and nuclear related technology to anyone. So Arihant is out of question for any other country. Not even the USA, Russia and UK sell nuclear submarines to anyone else. Let alone us.
2. We do not have our own domestic conventional submarine programme without foreign help

So how can we supply something to Taiwan without even having it ourselves?

That's stupid and simply false information.

 

[GHALIB]

Then we will wipe you out with a nuclear strike!

ha ha ha. ....go ahead .

 

[Areesh]

When did I mention 1962? Yes, China won against India with an army 7 times bigger. Big deal. China did get humiliated by india when it tried to capture Sikkim in 1967 though.