Chinese-Dragon
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,932
- Reaction score
- 52
- Country
- Location
Think Sun Zi...
What is the method of implementation?
Sun zi said "first attack their strategy, then attack their alliances."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Think Sun Zi...
Because when it comes to Viet Nam in particular, and the other two major countries that make up 'Indochina' -- Laos and Cambodia, China is a quasi-racist state, meaning China do not deem the three countries to be China's equals. Blood and cultural ties do not elevate them to that equal status. Great Britain and Europeans do not consider Americans to be their intellectual and cultural equals. Northern Viets have the greatest blood and cultural ties to China. Southern Viets have more Laos, Cambodia, and even Indian in them. Northern Viets have the institutional memories of China's historical condescension and contempt for the three 'Indochina' countries.I completely agree with your view so far as I read here.
Actually Philippines is already China's "ally" - on key geo-political grounds, Philippines follows China closely; so does Vietnam, in spite of South China Sea disputes among them.
Indeed I don't understand why CMC and CPC ( those dimwits) wanna make Vietnam a national "enermy". There're a significant ethnic CHinese population in Vietnam. Many Vietnamese are mixed with Chinese blood. Plus, Vietnam is a Confucius state and had a close cultural bond with China throughout the history. Perhaps more importantly, Vietnam's size and her geo location are extremely important to to China's SE Asian and even South Asia stategy - a pro-China Vietnam would be crucial in the region. CMC and CPC should forgive that short unpleasant border conflict with Vietnam and win them over with trades.
And would this be 'consistent' with you boys' oft repeated self-righteous claims that China do not meddle in other countries' internal affairs? Looks like China's rise in Asia may not so 'peaceful' after all, eh?I am sure that there would be many PLA generals believe that China should support, both financially and military equipments-wise, Indian Maoists and other armed freedom fighters on the ground of Human Rights (look no further at how impoverish and hopeless life most Indians live under their oppressive New Delhi regime) , to put that artificial "India" ( only being able to put together by their colonial white masters) out of its pathetic misery. Then China would likely gain some appraisal as well from most parts of the world for doing the right thing.
The question is when those PLA voices could become the mainstream. Therefore, Indias trademark backstabbing on Wen during his recent visit is a good wake-up call for those harmonious CPC idiots.
I am sure that there would be many PLA generals believe that China should support, both financially and military equipments-wise, Indian Maoists and other armed freedom fighters on the ground of Human Rights (look no further at how impoverish and hopeless life most Indians live under their oppressive New Delhi regime) , to put that artificial "India" ( only being able to put together by their colonial white masters) out of its pathetic misery. Then China would likely gain some appraisal as well from most parts of the world for doing the right thing.
The question is when those PLA voices could become the mainstream. Therefore, Indias trademark backstabbing on Wen during his recent visit is a good wake-up call for those harmonious CPC idiots.
Because when it comes to Viet Nam in particular, and the other two major countries that make up 'Indochina' -- Laos and Cambodia, China is a quasi-racist state, meaning China do not deem the three countries to be China's equals. Blood and cultural ties do not elevate them to that equal status. Great Britain and Europeans do not consider Americans to be their intellectual and cultural equals. Northern Viets have the greatest blood and cultural ties to China. Southern Viets have more Laos, Cambodia, and even Indian in them. Northern Viets have the institutional memories of China's historical condescension and contempt for the three 'Indochina' countries.
I am sure that there would be many PLA generals believe that China should support, both financially and military equipments-wise, Indian Maoists and other armed freedom fighters on the ground of Human Rights (look no further at how impoverish and hopeless life most Indians live under their oppressive New Delhi regime) , to put that artificial "India" ( only being able to put together by their colonial white masters) out of its pathetic misery. Then China would likely gain some appraisal as well from most parts of the world for doing the right thing.
The question is when those PLA voices could become the mainstream. Therefore, Indias trademark backstabbing on Wen during his recent visit is a good wake-up call for those harmonious CPC idiots.
Because when it comes to Viet Nam in particular, and the other two major countries that make up 'Indochina' -- Laos and Cambodia, China is a quasi-racist state, meaning China do not deem the three countries to be China's equals. Blood and cultural ties do not elevate them to that equal status. Great Britain and Europeans do not consider Americans to be their intellectual and cultural equals. Northern Viets have the greatest blood and cultural ties to China. Southern Viets have more Laos, Cambodia, and even Indian in them. Northern Viets have the institutional memories of China's historical condescension and contempt for the three 'Indochina' countries.
And would this be 'consistent' with you boys' oft repeated self-righteous claims that China do not meddle in other countries' internal affairs? Looks like China's rise in Asia may not so 'peaceful' after all, eh?
Its just an opinion "GLOBL COP".... Also except india nobdy hates china!
And india is disliked by almost all its neighbouring countries coz of its proxies....
Also uncle sam should look into his own f/...d up policies.
hey was wondering if there is any neighbor to china who at some point did not have some kind of land dispute....
And this is because Bharat has had wars with all her neighbour.
I mean look at the history, there is no empire, no country like bharat, It is the only entity in the history of mankind which fight with all her neighbour.
Pakistan 47,65,71,84,99
China 62
Sikkim75
Maldives 1989
Sri Lanka 83-2009
Bangladesh Several skirmishes
Bottomline is bharat cannot live peacefully with anyone
This is where you boys' study and understanding of history, vis-a-vis inter-states relations, is lacking. The US-UK-Euro analogy I presented is applicable only up to a point. Great Britain and the European countries can only resort of colonialism to assert themselves on the global stage. The young US continued to expand and grow on its own continent and over time grew a geopolitical prominence that eclipsed Great Britain and Europe.C'mon, be realistic here. A small country like Vietnam can never become "equal" ( in geopolitical sense) with much larger counterparts, being China or else.
Friends yes; but "equal", unfortunately, no, just not realistic, ok? That however doesn't have to have a racist undertone, or mean that China should dictate, or even bully, Vietnam's internal affairs though.
I don't know too much about Vietnams'current internal politics, but I pressume that Northern Vietnamese are dominant domesticly in both economics and politics, correct?
Vietnam today seems to me a bit like late-Mao era of China, too paranoid. Reformers in Vietnam should get close together with China instead. This is a logical and smart conclusion which many Vietnamese and Chinese elites could agree, I reckon. I forsee, therefore, that Vietnam becomes China's friend in the forseeable future.