China may not be interested in taking sides on Kashmir: Media

[Gregor Clegane]

So when China used its power of Veto, what do U think it was doing?


Thats why I keep on saying one thing again and again:

Of many things I love about China, one main point is that they are damn good listeners, but in the end do whatever is right for them.

That's because as said in the original article China has adopted a neutral stand on Kashmir.

You can see that in the recent past China has refused to mention that it supports Pakistani stance on kashmir unlike OIC.

 

[shah1398]

That's because as said in the original article China has adopted a neutral stand on Kashmir.

You can see that in the recent past China has refused to mention that it supports Pakistani stance on kashmir unlike OIC.

Dear Bro. Like I said just a few minutes before. Chinese actions are more evident than what they speak. They are good listeners and do less of talking but more of practical steps. Why do U think India is so perturbed with CPEC passing through AJK? Actions are louder than words.

 

[Gregor Clegane]

Dear Bro. Like I said just a few minutes before. Chinese actions are more evident than what they speak. They are good listeners and do less of talking but more of practical steps. Why do U think India is so perturbed with CPEC passing through AJK? Actions are louder than words.

Actually India doesn't Guv a rat's *** about CPEC but has to mention it in public to satisfy domestic constituency.

Even in terms if action China has refused to support UN resolutions in Kashmir.

 

[unbiasedopinion]

Nothing to be trusted coming out of Chinese. They are doing this to have India on their side on SCS without returning any favor from India.

India should get commitment from China publicly on supporting India in UNSC. Untill India does not get UNSC seat, India should not take side on SCS.

 

[Jai.Singh]

If china is likely to give up this project or unlikely to give up this project does not matter to USA/NATO and India as both these nations with complete support of Iran, UAE and Afghanistan have already decided to thrawt this project once it becomes operational.Even the mighty British Empire,Soviet Union and currently USA could not dominate af-pak region.Now USA/NATO/India/Japan/Iran/UAE and Afghanistan will see how china will successfully do business in this region with all its infrastructure and assets intact in this fragile af-pak area.Poor china has got into mess with this ill conceived project.DUMBO CHINA,BRING IT ON,THE GAME IS ON

 

[Hamza913]

It seems that the 'friendship' is not that high, deep or sweet as claimed by our smaller neighbour.

The article is by Indian Express, does that tell you nothing?

China is going to have to take Pakistan's side, as CPEC goes through Pakistani Kashmir.

 

[Gregor Clegane]

The article is by Indian Express, does that tell you nothing?

China is going to have to take Pakistan's side, as CPEC goes through Pakistani Kashmir.

Nope the article is China's Global Times:

Full Article from China's state run Global Times:

India should adopt an open attitude toward the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

By Hu Weijia Source:Global Times Published: 2016/8/16 0:23:39
Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj voiced India's concerns over the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which passes through Pakistan+occupied+Kashmir (P0K), during Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's India trip, Indian media reported.
It is regrettable to see CPEC become another unharmonious factor in Sino-Indian ties, but China is unlikely to give up on the idea of CPEC because of India's protest. In fact, the economic corridor, linking Northwest China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region to Gwadar Port in southwestern Pakistan, does not target any third party, India included. Given that China has developed close economic ties with both India and Pakistan in recent years, Beijing is unlikely to be interested in taking a side between the two countries.
The dispute over Kashmir between India and Pakistan makes the two countries habitually vigilant against any possibility of large-scale foreign investment flowing into the region, but it is the Kashmir conflict itself, rather than any alleged political intent behind the foreign investment, that creates tension in the region. Rather than prevent foreign investors from entering the region as a solution to concerns over CPEC, India should focus on its negations with Pakistan to settle the Kashmir dispute.
It is precisely because of the region's worsening investment environment that P0K's economy is still heavily reliant on agriculture. Also, the northern part of India bordering Pakistan and India-controlled Kashmir both lack basic infrastructure.
The CPEC is not a zero-sum game where Pakistan gains and India loses. If economic cooperation between China and Pakistan can improve infrastructure in the region, including in the Kashmir area, India will have an opportunity to expand trade routes to Central Asia.
New Delhi may need to adopt an open attitude toward CPEC so the project can speed up development in the region and benefit the local population. Hopefully India can also improve infrastructure in the regions bordering Pakistan to promote regional economic integration. Any way in which India can put aside politics and join in the task of economic development would be welcome.
Economic cooperation between India, Pakistan and China would create an open atmosphere for launching talks to solve the Kashmir dispute. In this regard, New Delhi may need to take the long view for its national interests.
The author is a reporter with the Global Times, China.
bizopinion@globaltimescomcn

httpwwwglobaltimescn/content/1000682.shtml

 

[dray]

The article is by Indian Express, does that tell you nothing?

China is going to have to take Pakistan's side, as CPEC goes through Pakistani Kashmir.

And it turned out to be an article by China's state run media...too bad.

 

[Hamza913]

And it turned out to be an article by China's state run media...too bad.

Even then, China has already taken a side by having CPEC go through Pakistani Kashmir.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Please post the chinese media article, not any Indian link.

 

[Pakistani E]

Do you think I care if China does not take sides in this? Frankly, even if Pakistan was to abandon the cause of Kashmir, do you think it would make any difference to my stance? I have familial bonds to the Kashmir Valley, my loyalty to that place is not borne out of how many friends I have but for the love of my people.

 

[Areesh]

Choti choti khushyian for Indians.

CPEC projects would be completed despite Indian protests though and that is more important than any news link calling AJK Azad Kashmir or whatever.

@Gregor Clegane not even Pakistan's closest ally supports its claims meanwhile Armenia in middle of nowhere supports India's right.

Neither America supports you nor china supports you.

Whatever they call AJK which can always change in next news link, they have already cleared to you that CPEC projects would be completed no matter how much you protest about it:

China will not give up building the economic corridor with Pakistan through a disputed area in Kashmir simply because India has problems with it, state media said on Tuesday, indicating that New Delhi has no option but to keep an open mind towards the project.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...inese-media/story-nYmjWNy8ubDKTc0tvz5xwL.html

So your protests are in dustbin while in news link the term AJK would come back.

Till then enjoy your choto choti khushiyan .

 

[X-2.]

China may not be interested in taking sides on Kashmir: Media

China is “unlikely” to give up on the USD 46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor being built through Azad Kashmir despite India’s protests but it may not be interested in taking sides in the Kashmir dispute due to close economic ties with both nations, state-run media said on Monday.

“It is regrettable to see CPEC become another unharmonious factor in Sino-India ties, but China is unlikely to give up on the idea of CPEC because of India’s protest,” an article in Global Times said. “In fact, the economic corridor, linking northwest China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region to Gwadar Port in southwestern Pakistan, does not target any third party, India included. Given that China has developed close economic ties with both India and Pakistan in recent years, Beijing is unlikely to be interested in taking a side between the two countries,” it said.

Significantly, the article uses the term “Azad Kashmir” (Azad Kashmir) twice even though at one place it makes the mention attributing it to Indian media reports. “Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj voiced India’s concerns over the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which passes through Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir), during Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s India trip, Indian media reported,” the article said.


“It is precisely because of the region’s worsening investment environment that Azad Kashmir’s economy is still heavily reliant on agriculture. Also, the northern part of India bordering Pakistan” and Kashmir both lack basic infrastructure, the article said.

Chinese media usually refers to Azad Kashmir as Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Another state-run news outlet, the People’s Daily which which published photos of Chinese and Pakistani troops patrolling for the first time Xinjiang and Azad Kashmir border last month referred to the area as China-Pakistan border.

Global Times is part of People’s Daily publishing group controlled by the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC). In its article, the Global Times said, “the dispute over Kashmir between India and Pakistan makes the two countries habitually vigilant against any possibility of large-scale foreign investment flowing into the region, but it is the Kashmir conflict itself, rather than any alleged political intent behind the foreign investment, that creates tension in the region”.

“Rather than prevent foreign investors from entering the region as a solution to concerns over CPEC, India should focus on its negations with Pakistan to settle the Kashmir dispute,” it said.

“The CPEC is not a zero-sum game where Pakistan gains and India loses. If economic cooperation between China and Pakistan can improve infrastructure in the region, including in the Kashmir area, India will have an opportunity to expand trade routes to Central Asia,” the article said.

“New Delhi may need to adopt an open attitude toward CPEC so the project can speed up development in the region and benefit the local population. Hopefully India can also improve infrastructure in the regions bordering Pakistan to promote regional economic integration,” the article said.

Any way in which India can put aside politics and join in the task of economic development would be welcome, the article said. “Economic cooperation between India, Pakistan and China would create an open atmosphere for launching talks to solve the Kashmir dispute. In this regard, New Delhi may need to take the long view for its national interests,” it said.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ted-in-taking-sides-on-kashmir-media-2978062/

Seriously??

Choti choti khushyian for Indians.

CPEC projects would be completed despite Indian protests though and that is more important than any news link calling AJK Azad Kashmir or whatever.



Neither America supports you nor china supports you.

Whatever they call AJK which can always change in next news link, they have already cleared to you that CPEC projects would be completed no matter how much you protest about it:



http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...inese-media/story-nYmjWNy8ubDKTc0tvz5xwL.html

So your protests are in dustbin while in news link the term AJK would come back.

Till then enjoy your choto choti khushiyan .

Choti choti khushiyan ??

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

China may not be interested in taking sides on Kashmir: Media

China is “unlikely” to give up on the USD 46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor being built through Azad Kashmir despite India’s protests but it may not be interested in taking sides in the Kashmir dispute due to close economic ties with both nations, state-run media said on Monday.

“It is regrettable to see CPEC become another unharmonious factor in Sino-India ties, but China is unlikely to give up on the idea of CPEC because of India’s protest,” an article in Global Times said. “In fact, the economic corridor, linking northwest China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region to Gwadar Port in southwestern Pakistan, does not target any third party, India included. Given that China has developed close economic ties with both India and Pakistan in recent years, Beijing is unlikely to be interested in taking a side between the two countries,” it said.

Significantly, the article uses the term “Azad Kashmir” (Azad Kashmir) twice even though at one place it makes the mention attributing it to Indian media reports. “Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj voiced India’s concerns over the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which passes through Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir), during Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s India trip, Indian media reported,” the article said.


“It is precisely because of the region’s worsening investment environment that Azad Kashmir’s economy is still heavily reliant on agriculture. Also, the northern part of India bordering Pakistan” and Kashmir both lack basic infrastructure, the article said.

Chinese media usually refers to Azad Kashmir as Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Another state-run news outlet, the People’s Daily which which published photos of Chinese and Pakistani troops patrolling for the first time Xinjiang and Azad Kashmir border last month referred to the area as China-Pakistan border.

Global Times is part of People’s Daily publishing group controlled by the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC). In its article, the Global Times said, “the dispute over Kashmir between India and Pakistan makes the two countries habitually vigilant against any possibility of large-scale foreign investment flowing into the region, but it is the Kashmir conflict itself, rather than any alleged political intent behind the foreign investment, that creates tension in the region”.

“Rather than prevent foreign investors from entering the region as a solution to concerns over CPEC, India should focus on its negations with Pakistan to settle the Kashmir dispute,” it said.

“The CPEC is not a zero-sum game where Pakistan gains and India loses. If economic cooperation between China and Pakistan can improve infrastructure in the region, including in the Kashmir area, India will have an opportunity to expand trade routes to Central Asia,” the article said.

“New Delhi may need to adopt an open attitude toward CPEC so the project can speed up development in the region and benefit the local population. Hopefully India can also improve infrastructure in the regions bordering Pakistan to promote regional economic integration,” the article said.

Any way in which India can put aside politics and join in the task of economic development would be welcome, the article said. “Economic cooperation between India, Pakistan and China would create an open atmosphere for launching talks to solve the Kashmir dispute. In this regard, New Delhi may need to take the long view for its national interests,” it said.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ted-in-taking-sides-on-kashmir-media-2978062/

most of indian media is too much desperate and frustrated in kashmir. the real heading is different.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/china-not-...eace-sino-pakistan-ties-chinese-state-1576273

full heading
China not keen on taking sides on Kashmir but India must make peace with Sino-Pakistan ties: Chinese state media