jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Its always entertaining to read interpretation of defense systems by Chinese pdf members.
Last I recall any guided projectile has either a CEP of 0 or CEP >0
i.e greater the accuracy lower is the CEP.
100% accuracy would indicate a CEP of 0, and greater than 100% accuracy assuming would mean a negative CEP value.
I could find any academic sources confirming even theoretical existence of guided projectiles with CEP in negative values.
@jhungary @amardeep mishra is there any missile or guided rocket system on this planet that has accuracy greater than 100%?
@Nilgiri @Joe Shearer You are missing some gem posts here
Been in the army myself, I have yet to see anything they drop achieve 100% accuracy. Even F-15E dropping JDAM can be off by 50 meters, how can any weapon achieve 100% accuracy? Of course, there is actually an outside chance that the Military did actually achieve 100% accuracy in supporting fire, they just don't use them to piss us grunt off.
Over 100% accuracy is nominally impossible.
P.S. I think you have used CEP wrong. CEP is the value where a weapon have the range that 50% of the rounds it fire land in that radius. CEP 0 means 50% of its round hits 0 meter...
I deleted his post. Silly thing to say.
The rockets are impressive, well done China.
By the way, what's all this business about saying the test in he Gif is fake? What's the evidence behind it, or is it just speculation from folks?
In the video, the explosion from the Chinese rocket is from ground up (as you can see the smoke come up from the ground) which mean this is a ground explosion. In real projectile impact, the explosion is send outward (expand to the side instead of up) as the project itself exploded on ground, the shock wave is send to the side instead of going up.
If you fire an actual rocket and the shock wave go up, you are not going to kill anybody except those your rocket actually hit directly.