Show me a single Indian who says there are no slums in India but hippocrasy and lies of some chinese amazes me. Never ever heard of.............Oh my god.
I can post dozens of pic but let it be, the world know it all.
Plz, be rational we are developing country with big population its natural to have them and they are the symbol of development soon they will be dissapear with proper housings in both India and in China.
Please post. They must be recent. I am sure you will find some bad housing, but the question is not whether there are bad housing, but in which degree there are obvious non-permanent housing which lacks reasonable access to toilets. The slum is not a single house, but consists of many "houses". I reckon the degree of slums in China is less than in other countries. I.e, slums do not account for a
significant amount of a city's area in China. Bad housing in China? Yes. But housing which only consists of sheet metal,
dominating a pretty large area? Skeptical. I think that's what the other Chinese in this thread are thinking about when thinking about slums (me as well).
One must also be aware of the construct validity of this report:
The report's authors described a house as a slum if it lacked
at least one of these five amenities:
* a permanent structure
*
less than three people sharing a room
* access to water that was sufficient, affordable and could be obtained without extreme effort
* a private toilet or a public one shared with a reasonable number of people
* secure tenure
Of course this is also valid for India as well. I'd say that a house should not be considered as a slum because more than three people share the same room. IMO, a slum does not have a permanent structure or access to toilet. There must be a substantial number of people living nearby with the same conditions as well, so one bad neighbourhood can't be regarded as a slum, there must be a district. But then again, just my impression what a slum is like.