China launches Long March 11 carrier rocket to send six satellites into space

[rott]

Stop trolling and spoiling a good thread.



stop trolling and dick measurement all countries are great in their own terms and capacities. Comparing them is foolish.

No. It's the truth. The whole Indian cavalry was bragging about the 104 satellites launch or else why would I even bring this up?

 

[navtrek]

No. It's the truth. The whole Indian cavalry was bragging about the 104 satellites launch or else why would I even bring this up?

But why do you also want to fall to their level? It will only spoil the discussion. As an Indian yes its a sense of accomplishment from India's level China is way ahead may be that's why its not such a big deal for China.

There is no competition here.

 

[seesonic]

But why do you also want to fall to their level? It will only spoil the discussion. As an Indian yes its a sense of accomplishment from India's level China is way ahead may be that's why its not such a big deal for China.

There is no competition here.

Haha haha if ever there was an oxymoron in this useless rant about India, when the topic is about Chinese satellite launch.

On topic, congrats China.

You guys should had brag about India having a satellite at Mars.

That how you troll.

 

[navtrek]

You guys should had brag about India having a satellite at Mars.

That how you troll.

My point is simple "Just because somebody is eating shit should you also justify and eat shit ?"
Just because some body is trolling we should not use that as an excuse and start trolling isn't it. Because that's the whole difference btw an idiot and a normal educated human.

 

[Jlaw]

The problem with the numerous Indian satellites is that they're like toys. Each INDIAN satellite weighs a few pounds. The Indian satellites cannot do anything useful. India can launch 30 toy satellites at a time, but who cares? They're useless.

On the other hand, China launches USEFUL satellites that are hundreds, thousands, or ten-thousand pounds in weight. Chinese satellites serve industrial purposes for communication, infrared sensing, optical imaging, data relay, etc.

You cannot compare Chinese QUALITY satellites to pointless Indian QUANTITY satellites.

He was being sarcastic. No one can defeat Supapowa

The problem with the numerous Indian satellites is that they're like toys. Each INDIAN satellite weighs a few pounds. The Indian satellites cannot do anything useful. India can launch 30 toy satellites at a time, but who cares? They're useless.

On the other hand, China launches USEFUL satellites that are hundreds, thousands, or ten-thousand pounds in weight. Chinese satellites serve industrial purposes for communication, infrared sensing, optical imaging, data relay, etc.

You cannot compare Chinese QUALITY satellites to pointless Indian QUANTITY satellites.

Teenagers in China can make toy satellites for launch.

 

[seesonic]

My point is simple "Just because somebody is eating shit should you also justify and eat shit ?"
Just because some body is trolling we should not use that as an excuse and start trolling isn't it. Because that's the whole difference btw an idiot and a normal educated human.

Since when anyone is trolling

My point is simple "Just because somebody is sensitive should you also justify and be sensitive?"

 

[onebyone]

566848.jpg (99.79 kB, 1345x629 - viewed 6 times.)

?32252645859.jpg (98.88 kB, 1349x767 - viewed 10 times.)

456856858.jpg (113.54 kB, 1344x766 - viewed 8 times.)

366357547.jpg (109.71 kB, 1334x742 - viewed 11 times.)

 

[sinait]

My point is simple "Just because somebody is eating shit should you also justify and eat shit ?"
Just because some body is trolling we should not use that as an excuse and start trolling isn't it. Because that's the whole difference btw an idiot and a normal educated human.

Not true.
Boasting, bragging and lying in India has no parallel.
The amount of deluded in India is enormous.
If not exposed, it will end up like how the boastful lie of 36% of NASA scientists are Indians, among other lies, was being touted in the Indian parliament by a minister to support his contention that Indians are Supa Powans.
China India relations are as bad as it is could also be attributed to the consequence of this bragging of lies from India and its media.
For example there is no need to keep bragging that the Agni-5 can target all of China or that India can take on a 2 front war.
.

 

[Suriya]

What does that have to do with silly Indian satellites that weigh a few pounds?

India keeps launching a bunch of tiny satellites every year.

Except for the misleading headlines, there is no reason to launch those useless Indian satellites.

The Indian newspapers are IMPLYING that all satellites are equal. They MOST DEFINITELY ARE NOT.

Chinese satellites are extremely heavy, designed for an industrial purpose, and have undergone generations of upgrades. In contrast, Indian satellites are primitive and mostly useless.

Watch over 100 satellites deploy at the same time for India's space mission | ZD Net (February 16, 2017)
"Feb 16, 2017 - The majority of the smaller satellites, called 'Doves' by the owners Planet Labs, weighed only 10 pounds each. After reaching a height of over 500km, the satellites separated from the launcher at different times, angles, and speeds to avoid crashing into each other. A satellite was deployed once every few ..."
----------

China's DFH-4 communications satellite weighs 10,000 pounds.

A typical Indian satellite weighs 10 pounds.

A Chinese DFH-4 satellite is 1,000 times heavier than your Indian satellite.

While India launched 100 satellites (or 31 in another case), China launched ONLY ONE satellite.

However, the Chinese satellite is comprised of 10,000 pounds of high-technology.

In contrast, 100 Indian satellites that weigh 10 pounds each total 1,000 pounds of low-technology.

Which satellite launch is more impressive?

My Chinni ignorant ranter , India launches its own Big 3.5 ton satellites too .


GSLV-Mk III is capable launching 4 ton class of satellites to Geosynchronous Transfer orbit (GTO). It is a three-stage vehicle with two solid motor strap-ons (S200), a liquid propellant core stage (L110) and a cryogenic stage (C25).

GSLV-Mk III-D1 is the first developmental flight, carrying 3136 kg GSAT-19 satellite to a Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO). The vehicle is configured with a 5 m ogive payload fairing and slanted strap-on nose cone to provide aerodynamic robustness.

GSLV Mk III-D1 launched GSAT-19 on Monday, June 05, 2017 from the Second Launch Pad (SLP) at Satish Dhawan Space Centre SHAR (SDSC SHAR), Sriharikota.

 

[Martian2]

My Chinni ignorant ranter , India launches its own Big 3.5 ton satellites too .


GSLV-Mk III is capable launching 4 ton class of satellites to Geosynchronous Transfer orbit (GTO). It is a three-stage vehicle with two solid motor strap-ons (S200), a liquid propellant core stage (L110) and a cryogenic stage (C25).

GSLV-Mk III-D1 is the first developmental flight, carrying 3136 kg GSAT-19 satellite to a Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO). The vehicle is configured with a 5 m ogive payload fairing and slanted strap-on nose cone to provide aerodynamic robustness.

GSLV Mk III-D1 launched GSAT-19 on Monday, June 05, 2017 from the Second Launch Pad (SLP) at Satish Dhawan Space Centre SHAR (SDSC SHAR), Sriharikota.

You do realize China's DFH-4 is almost 5,000kg?

On PDF, you Indians and Turks need to stop claiming other nation's technologies as your own.

GSLV Mark III is European French technology, NOT INDIAN.
----------

GLSV Mark III rocket conducts ‘all-up’ launch with GSAT-19 satellite | NASA Spaceflight (June 5, 2017)

"About 114 seconds after liftoff, the rocket’s second stage – the lower stage of the core vehicle – ignited. This is an L110, powered by a pair of Vikas engines. The Vikas is a license-built version of the French Viking rocket engine, which powered Europe’s Ariane 1, 2, 3 and 4 rockets between 1979 and 2004.

India has previously used Vikas aboard PSLV and GSLV rockets. The second stage burns unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) propellant, oxidized by dinitrogen tetroxide. First stage burnout and separation occurred twenty-six seconds after second stage ignition."

 

[Suriya]

"About 114 seconds after liftoff, the rocket’s second stage – the lower stage of the core vehicle – ignited. This is an L110, powered by a pair of Vikas engines. The Vikas is a license-built version of the French Viking rocket engine, which powered Europe’s Ariane 1, 2, 3 and 4 rockets between 1979 and 2004.

You can aslo say US and USSR space program is based on V-2 rocket of Nazi Germany .

The Vikas design was based on the licensed version of the Viking engine with the chemical pressurisation system. The early production Vikas engines used some imported French components which were later replaced by domestically produced equivalents .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikas_(rocket_engine)

And have some shame you think China invented Rocket science ?? LOL

All the tech used in your space program is either borrowed from USSR and some even stolen from US.
Chinese theft of sensitive US military technology is still a 'huge problem,' says defense analyst

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/08/chi...s-military-technology-still-huge-problem.html


China catching up with USA on military technology after ‘STEALING developments’
https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...itary-donald-trump-xi-jinping-technology-hack

China’s Military Built with Cloned Weapons

https://news.usni.org/2015/10/27/chinas-military-built-with-cloned-weapons

 

[Martian2]

You can aslo say US and USSR space program is based on V-2 rocket of Nazi Germany .

The Vikas design was based on the licensed version of the Viking engine with the chemical pressurisation system. The early production Vikas engines used some imported French components which were later replaced by domestically produced equivalents .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikas_(rocket_engine)

And have some shame you think China invented Rocket science ?? LOL

All the tech used in your space program is either borrowed from USSR and some even stolen from US.
Chinese theft of sensitive US military technology is still a 'huge problem,' says defense analyst

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/08/chi...s-military-technology-still-huge-problem.html


China catching up with USA on military technology after ‘STEALING developments’
https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...itary-donald-trump-xi-jinping-technology-hack

China’s Military Built with Cloned Weapons

https://news.usni.org/2015/10/27/chinas-military-built-with-cloned-weapons

No. I'm not talking about the United States (or USSR) acquiring Nazi rocket technology from 70 years ago. Clearly, US rocket technology today bears little resemblance to 70-year-old German technology.

I'm talking about India licensing French rocket engine technology that is constantly used in Indian rockets TODAY for both India's PSLV and GSLV rockets.

I DO NOT APPRECIATE your attempt (by PDF member Suriya) to conceal the French rocket engine technology in your post and give the misleading impression that it is Indian technology.

 

[艹艹艹]

That's nothing. India launched 104 satellite in one go. SP12.

Potatoes? Tomatoes?……

 

[Three_Kingdoms]

That's nothing. India launched 104 satellite in one go. SP12.

How many of those are still functioning?
Correct me if I'm wrong.
The launching of satellites depends on the accuracy of the rocket reaching a designated orbit and the timely release of the concomittant payload(s). So during the course of ascension, the computerised control needs to calibrate and command that upon reaching the orbit, the satellite(s) is jettisoned as ordered. So regardless of how many satellites are carried by the rocket, the versatility of the rocket, the computerised control console and the "atomic clock" decide whether the mission is a success or failure. Literally, if you can launch one satellite into a designated orbit, you can expand the number if you care to launch many satellites more and of course if your rocket is capable of carrying the payload.

 

[rott]

How many of those are still functioning?
Correct me if I'm wrong.
The launching of satellites depends on the accuracy of the rocket reaching a designated orbit and the timely release of the concomittant payload(s). So during the course of ascension, the computerised control needs to calibrate and command that upon reaching of the orbit, the satellite(s) is jettisoned as ordered. So regardless of how many satellites are carried by the rocket, the versatility of the rocket, the computerised control console and the "atomic clock" decide whether the mission is a success or failure. Literally, if you can launch one satellite into a designated orbit, you can expand the number if you care to launch and of course if your rocket is capable of carrying the payload.

Bro, you take me too seriously. Please read between the lines.