What's new

China launches Compass duo via Long March 3B

Götterdämmerung;2901427 said:
I saw that video and I thought: wow, quite a big chip on Indian shoulder!

nations are different because people are different. shameless indians are talking about GLSV in this thread when its failure rate is about 80%. there is something more serious than their IQ issue - honesty.

they launch 800kg "satellite" or 10 100kg satellite in one shot and consider that kind of stupidity as achievement.

:blah: it is really sad that 1 billion people have to inherite such culture.
 
.
nations are different because people are different. shameless indians are talking about GLSV in this thread when its failure rate is about 80%. there is something more serious than their IQ issue - honesty.

they launch 800kg "satellite" or 10 100kg satellite in one shot and consider that kind of stupidity as achievement.

:blah: it is really sad that 1 billion people have to inherite such culture.

I don't think that you should've mistaken timetravel and his alike as the representive of whole India especially those people who actually do work at IRSO and DRDO, we have couple those extremists at our hands as well. Neven underestimate the potential of your opponents.
 
.
I don't think that you should've mistaken timetravel and his alike as the representive of whole India especially those people who actually do work at IRSO and DRDO, we have couple those extremists at our hands as well. Neven underestimate the potential of your opponents.

I don't think india is even qualified as "opponent":

1. most of them are not smart enough, if you ever work with indians, you know what I am saying. with 1 billion population, sure they have smart people and some of them are damn smart, that is called statistics/probability. but overall, it is a low IQ nation with an average IQ of 85.

2. most of them are lazy. they have hard working ones, but that is usually from their socially disadvantaged groups.

3. they are in general not honest, they cheat/fool each other at a scale that can even shock Chinese. check their loser PM Singh's comment that Mumbai is going to catch up with Shanghai in 5 years. ;)
 
.
I don't think india is even qualified as "opponent":

1. most of them are not smart enough, if you ever work with indians, you know what I am saying. with 1 billion population, sure they have smart people and some of them are damn smart, that is called statistics/probability. but overall, it is a low IQ nation with an average IQ of 85.

2. most of them are lazy. they have hard working ones, but that is usually from their socially disadvantaged groups.

3. they are in general not honest, they cheat/fool each other at a scale that can even shock Chinese. check their loser PM Singh's comment that Mumbai is going to catch up with Shanghai in 5 years. ;)

and most chinese are too short, most are incapable of thinking, most are slaves of ccp and all chinese can do is follow what ccp tells. No independent thinking capacity.

nations are different because people are different. shameless indians are talking about GLSV in this thread when its failure rate is about 80%. there is something more serious than their IQ issue - honesty.

they launch 800kg "satellite" or 10 100kg satellite in one shot and consider that kind of stupidity as achievement.

:blah: it is really sad that 1 billion people have to inherite such culture.

Chinese have nothing to better ISRO except in two areas I mentioned. Overall ISRO is far ahead and numero uno.

and for only those two field where we need to improve,
wait for GSLV we will have Heavy Lift Capacity also. and we will send person in space after that. Then ISRO will be ahead then China in ALL Spheres.

wow get ur IQ checked seems its dropper below zero. WHat is more challenging placing 10 satellites weighing 100 kg each and totalling 1000 kg or 1 satellite weighing 1000 kg. A 1st grade kid will tell u what is more challenging. do people in China believe what u say, then i must say they need to have more vitamins for their mental capacities to improve.
 
. .
and most chinese are too short, most are incapable of thinking, most are slaves of ccp and all chinese can do is follow what ccp tells. No independent thinking capacity.



Chinese have nothing to better ISRO except in two areas I mentioned. Overall ISRO is far ahead and numero uno.

and for only those two field where we need to improve,
wait for GSLV we will have Heavy Lift Capacity also. and we will send person in space after that. Then ISRO will be ahead then China in ALL Spheres.

wow get ur IQ checked seems its dropper below zero. WHat is more challenging placing 10 satellites weighing 100 kg each and totalling 1000 kg or 1 satellite weighing 1000 kg. A 1st grade kid will tell u what is more challenging. do people in China believe what u say, then i must say they need to have more vitamins for their mental capacities to improve.

Alright let's look at the ten satellites that was sent by that launch.
AAUSAT-II, student-built CubeSat built and operated by students from Aalborg University in Denmark, 0.75 kg
COMPASS-1, a German amateur CubeSat picosatellite, built and operated by Aachen University of Applied Science, 1 kg.
SEEDS-2, Japanese amateur CubeSat picosatellite, built and operated by Nihon University, 1kg.
Delfi-C3, CubeSat satellite constructed by students at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, 2.2 kg.
CUTE-1.7, an amateur radio satellite in the form of a double CubeSat, 3 kg.
CanX-6/NTS, 6.5 kg
CanX-2, 3.5 kg

If you know anything about aerospace engineering, you will know that those minisatellites just have to be dropped along its path without much calculation and composation for bus' momentum by any additional manuever. Also those are student or amature projects that most commercial rocket aren't interested in or consider worth sending. Probably also India carried those without charge like it did with its payload on board of Chandrayaan 1.

Before you continue, you still own me many answers to my questions.
 
.
Götterdämmerung;2901427 said:
I saw that video and I thought: wow, quite a big chip on Indian shoulder!

India can only hope to be a middle income country by 2030 if all goes well.

That video was frankly embarrassing to watch.
 
.
India can only hope to be a middle income country by 2030 if all goes well.

That video was frankly embarrassing to watch.

dear, we believe that Indians rise and with it India will automatically rise.

whoever you are, a chinese pretender or a chinese sympathiser .... they believe "chinese" are cannot fodder to be burnt in the furnace to make china rise. it's their philosophy, and none of our concern.

btw.. you may change your views, if you were the one who is being put into the furnace. good luck.
 
.
dear, we believe that Indians rise and with it India will automatically rise.

The thing is, you guys can beliefe whatever you want. But that video shamelessly has to step on us Europeans to show India's rise. China on the other hand has always been emphasising that China's rise is a win-win situation for all.

whoever you are, a chinese pretender or a chinese sympathiser .... they believe "chinese" are cannot fodder to be burnt in the furnace to make china rise. it's their philosophy, and none of our concern.

btw.. you may change your views, if you were the one who is being put into the furnace. good luck.

The cannon fodder you mentionned are the millions of starving deaths in India. For those unfortunate Indians it's a daily hell on earth.
 
. .
Alright let's look at the ten satellites that was sent by that launch.
AAUSAT-II, student-built CubeSat built and operated by students from Aalborg University in Denmark, 0.75 kg
COMPASS-1, a German amateur CubeSat picosatellite, built and operated by Aachen University of Applied Science, 1 kg.
SEEDS-2, Japanese amateur CubeSat picosatellite, built and operated by Nihon University, 1kg.
Delfi-C3, CubeSat satellite constructed by students at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, 2.2 kg.
CUTE-1.7, an amateur radio satellite in the form of a double CubeSat, 3 kg.
CanX-6/NTS, 6.5 kg
CanX-2, 3.5 kg

If you know anything about aerospace engineering, you will know that those minisatellites just have to be dropped along its path without much calculation and composation for bus' momentum by any additional manuever. Also those are student or amature projects that most commercial rocket aren't interested in or consider worth sending. Probably also India carried those without charge like it did with its payload on board of Chandrayaan 1.

Before you continue, you still own me many answers to my questions.

i dont care whether India carried for free or charged. I dont care whether its student or NASA payload. Launching 10 is more complex then 1. I am not chinese you can manipulate. Even Russia failed when it tried to launch so many.

this much for ur question.

Also tell me now which of followign is true:

Chinese students and amateurs have no brain. Means no chinese students capable of making any payload worth sending to space. So therefore china not launching any students or amateurs satellites.

OR

China launching amateur satellites as part of max 1,2,3 satelitties group, coz it cannot send more then that.

Has to be one of two. No other option. Accept whichever u like.
 
.
forget wikipedia.. come to real world...every chinese is almost 5 feet or less... 90% of them.. :lol: no way taller then Indians

Its the opposite. Indians are stunted due to malnutrition, while Chinese are as tall as Americans while being 30% thinner and more athletic. That's because we have the optimal mix of nutrition and exercise.

http://www.alvanon.com/news/CHINASCAN.pdf
 
.
guys why are we arguing with Indian trolls here?
its fairly clear that china is way ahead of India in space

im pretty sure i said this somewhere on pdf before,

we launch heavier things
we launch more things
we have better electronics(domestic capability)
we have a better success rate
we can launch humans
we have more experience(since 1969)
we have more money to throw at the projects
we have better schools to train superior engineers and scientists
we now have our own space station

etc. etc. etc.

oh right, they can launch 10 tiny satellites at once with a combine weight less than one of ours, guess nothing else matters and that they are also ahead of Russia and the US since those 2 countries have not done that either:coffee:
 
.
i dont care whether India carried for free or charged. I dont care whether its student or NASA payload. Launching 10 is more complex then 1. I am not chinese you can manipulate. Even Russia failed when it tried to launch so many.

this much for ur question.

Also tell me now which of followign is true:
Chinese students and amateurs have no brain. Means no chinese students capable of making any payload worth sending to space. So therefore china not launching any students or amateurs satellites.

You are right on. India has not amature satellites up to date. China on the other hand sent its XM-1 amature satellite in 2009 piggybacked on LM-4C to SSO. Even XM-1 weight more than those mini satellites India sent at 60 kg.
 
.
guys why are we arguing with Indian trolls here?
its fairly clear that china is way ahead of India in space

im pretty sure i said this somewhere on pdf before,

we launch heavier things
we launch more things
we have better electronics(domestic capability)
we have a better success rate
we can launch humans
we have more experience(since 1969)
we have more money to throw at the projects
we have better schools to train superior engineers and scientists
we now have our own space station

etc. etc. etc.

oh right, they can launch 10 tiny satellites at once with a combine weight less than one of ours, guess nothing else matters and that they are also ahead of Russia and the US since those 2 countries have not done that either:coffee:

Indian trolls Hijacked the thread almost 8 pages way off topic.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom