And it's responsible to implement a lockdown every few months and disrupt lives, with no end in sight other than waiting for a miracle vaccine? If businesses go bust, will the government be "responsible" and bail them out? If workers lose jobs, will the government be "responsible" and feed their family and pay for their loans? If the government don't, are they then "irresponsible" too like you put it?
The UK have loosen all restrictions and I don't see their people petitioning to return to a lockdown because they can potentially lose their sense of taste/smell. They have reached a new normal, and the rest of the world is aspiring the same and gradually move towards the same direction.
If China wants to continue with zero-covid, fine, it's their own choice. But to frame the choices as responsible or irresponsible, superior or inferior "social structure and ideology", winner or loser from the virus; it's a very superficial and narrow-minded thinking.