zectech
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2018
- Messages
- 4,090
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
I m not happy about the crackdown on home tutoring industry policies, it hurts my business a lot, and it won't help to encourage parents to have more children, it's actually counterproductive.
Here was my post on that that I decided not to post months ago because the limit on tutoring was not a complete ban:
I don't know about this. The amount of money poured into the for profit tutoring did produce results. Sure it was unfair but it also produces some truly elite talent. So unless there's a massive increase in money for public education, those elite talent might disappear.
So is there no way now for parents who want to spend money to give their kids a leg up in class?
...I was thinking of something similar. Expensive tutoring for the rich imparts more learning on select kids, for example teaching a musical instrument to them. If your school does not produce concert pianists in the kids, rich parents hire musicians to potentially make their kids concert pianists. You can't rely on public and college education for everything. Tutors have an important role in development. So this is a poor policy, unless the state offers paid employment to the best tutors to tutor the brightest kids free of charge in the school system. This would make things even more efficient in developing talent in China. For not every rich kid can become a concert pianist. If China focuses on providing even better than top tutoring talent, the best of the best tutors to every school for kids who can excel. This would be a good idea.
simply to ban the tutoring of rich kids is a bad idea. This has to be replaced with something far better.
Some type of tier system:
Below average students get free tutoring from average teachers
Average students get free tutoring from exceptional tutors
Above Average students get free tutoring from elite tutors to make these kids the new elite educated which China needs for decades.
A merit based tutoring system is the best option that I can think of.
A form of public tutoring would lower pay for tutors since they would lose some private sector funding.
Since the state could not pay for the whole tutoring industry and to tutor every child every day. The children who excel in their tutoring, get more and longer tutoring per month, free. Those kids who are not the top talent and not benefiting greatly from the tutoring, get less tutoring. And would have to pay for more tutoring. Rich parent can also have the option to pay for extra tutoring. This is the way to democratize tutoring by letting every child to have access to free tutoring and of their choice and what they excel at. There is no need for Beijing to tutor every kid to be a violinist.
I am guessing that the CPC maybe weighed this idea and found this to be too expensive to have free access to tutoring, even limited.
Maybe when China has a domestic consumer economy that demands more goods and especially services, that Beijing would reconsider and have limited free tutoring.
Children would be graded from a 2 to 8 score.
Children who are exceptional get an 8, and children who have poorly developed skills get a 2. 8 meaning two times a week free tutoring. And 2 equal tutoring every other week. Average kids get 1 tutoring lesson a week for free. And the parents pick with discipline is taught depending on the availabity of tutors. With the kids in schools with the highest grades get first choice.
Last edited: