Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I let the international community to seek the truth. Purely based on logic alone will tell that. How can we not know about the island first when we are simply the most capable NAVY country in Asia?do you realise that what you are telling here is nothing more than lie and fake? It appears you took the text from a Chinese blog.
I believe it is a typical Chinese mentality.
I suggest you to read the history from other sources.
you are low IQ monkey not knowing that Jiao Zhi and Tonkin refer to different terms and meanings? Google it!
I repeat, none of the stuff you said is true. Provide source so the world can read and see if it's true.In the peace document of San Francisco conference stated that Japan shall been given up all rights over Korean, Taiwan and Pinghu island to China.
In San Francisco conference presented to Vietnam, PM Tran Van Huu of Government of King Bao Dai, he is an official delegate of Vietnam attended, protested claim of China over our Island (made by ROC 1948). By the voting delegates from rest of world have been rejected claim of China with the votes 48/1.
In the history Vietnam regained Independence from China by the Battle of Bach Dang river in the year 938 ACE. Chinese navy was defeated by Vietnam navy by our King Ngo Quyen.
In the past Chinese book stated that there is Jiao Zhi sea, the sea of Jiao Zhi people, today called as Vietnam. and so the Islands it was stated Islands belong to Southern country. And also The Full map of man Qing Emperor printed in China, it stated that the last point of China is Hai Nan Island.
Geneva accord 1954 signed by China and North Vietnam, there is two states in Vietnam, Islands belong to South Vietnam. North Vietnam don't have right to The Island of South Vietnam. After Vietnam war 1975 Islands OFFICAL belong to South Vietnam liberation Front Government. United Vietnam from 1976 has right of South Vietnam to claim sovereignty of Dai Nam Kingdom from Nguyen Dynasty.
There was no so called "condition of help of China'" in cold war. In the past China said there is "voluntary help". China stop lying about the nature of letter of PVD, and also he don't have right to do that.
I reminder you that Lee Dang Hui president of Taiwan affirmed that Senkaku belong to Japan, could you considered that there is OFFICIAL statement of China ?
Chinese are biggest liar in the world.
I let the international community to seek the truth. Purely based on logic alone will tell that. How can we not know about the island first when we are simply the most capable NAVY country in Asia?
I repeat, none of the stuff you said is true. Provide source so the world can read and see if it's true.
Here is the bold part where your whole argument is flaw and laughable by world communities. Lee Dang Hui is president of who?
First, it was an allege statement from Japan. Two, Lee Teng-hui is a Japanese's dog. Three, Lee Teng-hui is president of ROC, who is not official government and representation of the current China Nation, known as PRC. His words is the equivalent of a rat mouth like you claiming Philippines belong to the USA. Do you understand how laughable you just make yourself look by citing Lee Teng Hui? LOLStudy more, boy ! Lee Teng-hui, He was the President of the Republic of China and Chairman of the Kuomintang (KMT), he said that the Senkaku Islands are part of Japan.
Quoted:
"Japan also alleges that China and Taiwan only started claiming ownership of the islands in 1971, following a 1969 United Nations report that large oil and gas reserves may exist under the seabed near the islands. Japan further claims that former president of Republic of China, Lee Teng-hui, said that the Senkaku Islands are part of Okinawa."
Senkaku Islands | Nihongo News
Note that, my opinion is that: statement of Lee Teng Hui is not OFFICIAL, it was not ratified by National Assemble of united China.
Wow...reading this topic is like comedy. How are you guys supposed to live with each other when all you do is insult each other?
You can´t use the document for your claim. First, at that time North Vietnam had neither administration nor control (that means sovereignty) over the Paracels. Thus the government of North Vietnam had no say. Otherwise today Vietnam can "cede" Hainan to a third party, for instance Japan.Exactly. It shows how delusional and manipulative the Vietnamese can be. Even their Communist North Vietnam agreed Paracel belong to us in condition we helped them in the Vietnam war. This two face government must not remember anything.
well, Chinese and Vietnamese are not living together. We go different ways since more than 1,000 years.Wow...reading this topic is like comedy. How are you guys supposed to live with each other when all you do is insult each other?
New Recruit
Study more, boy ! Lee Teng-hui, He was the President of the Republic of China and Chairman of the Kuomintang (KMT), he said that the Senkaku Islands are part of Japan.
Quoted:
"Japan also alleges that China and Taiwan only started claiming ownership of the islands in 1971, following a 1969 United Nations report that large oil and gas reserves may exist under the seabed near the islands. Japan further claims that former president of Republic of China, Lee Teng-hui, said that the Senkaku Islands are part of Okinawa."
Senkaku Islands | Nihongo News
Note that, my opinion is that: statement of Lee Teng Hui is not OFFICIAL, it was not ratified by National Assemble of united China.
You make too much logical error in that post. One, you are in a civil war. In a civil war, property of each side will be determined in the afterward. I kept repeating this important point to you that you fail to understand. The North won and rightfully deserved every property that they received from the South. The letter is a direct recognition of our territorial rights "including Paracel and Spratly Islands" that your government accept. You can try to use different words but the letter is clearly indicating of acceptance.You can´t use the document for your claim. First, at that time North Vietnam had neither administration nor control (that means sovereignty) over the Paracels. Thus the government of North Vietnam had no say. Otherwise today Vietnam can "cede" Hainan to a third party, for instance Japan.
Second, the note did not declare to give up Vietnam’s sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands.
Third, only the parliament of North Vietnam had the right/ authority to declare/ decide questions on sovereignty, not the government.
here more from the analyse
Paracel and Spratly Islands Forum: Analyzing the Diplomatic Note of Pham Van Dong
2. The country that claims “estoppel” must prove that based on that declaration or action, there are actions or inactions being carried out by that country which constitutes “reliance”, as is called in English and American law.
3. The country claiming “estoppel” also has to prove that based on the declaration of the other country, it has suffered damage, or that the other country has benefited when making that declaration.
Applying these criteria of estoppel to the declaration of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, we can see that conditions 2 and 3 are missing. In the years 1956, 1958, and 1965, China did not have any attitude or make any changes in its attitude based on North Vietnam’s declaration. China also cannot prove that it suffered damage for relying on that declaration. North Vietnam did not benefit in any way from making that declaration. At that time, Vietnam and China saw themselves as close comrades and friends. The declaration made by PM Pham Van Dong was based on that friendship. Moreover, the wording of the declaration does not clearly and unequivocally affirm Chinese ownership of the Paracel Islands. The letter only states: “The government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision (the decision to determine the 12 nautical mile territorial waters of China), and will direct the proper government agencies to respect absolutely the 12 nautical mile territorial waters of China….”
You make too much logical error in that post. One, you are in a civil war. In a civil war, property of each side will be determined in the afterward. I kept repeating this important point to you that you fail to understand. The North won and rightfully deserved every property that they received from the South. The letter is a direct recognition of our territorial rights "including Paracel and Spratly Islands" that your government accept. You can try to use different words but the letter is clearly indicating of acceptance.
Two, when you accept a sovereignty right of another country territorial declaration, especially our declaration is clear as day, you give up the sovereignty of your territorial claims, in this case Paracel and Spratly.
Third, the parliament is an INTEGRAL part of your government body, especially in a one-party country.
Lastly, the response of condition Estoppel doctrine 2 & 3 in that article applied.
First, Condition #2 you did carry out action and inaction by showing your support to us in other relevant cases such as Taiwan at the time. Secondly in Condition #3, you did gain benefits when making that declaration. We provided more supply to the North Vietnam in that war which aid you immensely in your fight.
Using your ceding example of Hainan to Japan is incredibly stupid. You were never in a civil war and are not part of our country. You have no business giving up land of other country. The North and South were one country prior to the split and it was only a temporary split. . Instead what you should cited is the KMT/CCP equivalent. This is equivalence of KMT giving up Hainan to Japan and had KMT won our civil war, and then yes Hainan should be giving to Japan.