What's new

China-India Geopolitics: News & Discussions

We all know what adults do to naughty children ;)

China is hinting it will do the same again after 55 years when India crosses the line.
India too scared to cross the line. they will get add spanked again. but they are good at distorting Chinese history and exaggerating Indian achievement like this member @Syama Ayas
 
India is an agrarian country.

However, as a primarily agrarian country, India has quite an uncompetitive and inefficient agricultural sector.

It is "...unpresidented" that India's industry value added is in fact declining... even before rising. Like you say, India may be heading towards being a huge agrarian country.


upload_2016-12-24_12-13-56.png
 
I do not know how India will manage industrialization. They have too many and more able (and with equally cheaper labor and better management and logistics/infra) competitors right next to China -- most of which share a more open border with China.

Perhaps India needs to find a niche, instead of dreaming of premature super-powernes. It needs to act as a small country (that it is) and seek where its strength lies and manipulate it.

Taiwan province did this way from the 60s and it worked. Taiwan is a small province-region with several strength points.

India cannot be a US or China; an all-round great power.

I disagree. Indians can be successful. But not in a British created entity called India. They need to revert back to Indian states and empires prior to British arrival. Each little nation state would than be able to find their niche and be more successful. Indians need to create their synergy. The sum of its parts will be greater than the whole.
 
I disagree. Indians can be successful. But not in a British created entity called India. They need to revert back to Indian states and empires prior to British arrival. Each little nation state would than be able to find their niche and be more successful. Indians need to create their synergy. The sum of its parts will be greater than the whole.

They can be as success as Nepal, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka if broken down into pieces. Just look at their neighbors who share India culture.

From my point of view, Afghanistan and Bhutan, even located in South Asia geographically, are different from India culturally. Afghanistan should join Central Asia countries, while Bhutan should rejoin China's Xizang. They will have better futures. Even Pakistan should integrate more with Middle East and Central Asia.
 
OMG, seriously?
What r they doing?

Their services value added as % of GDP is increasing. So, probably millions of them are moving to high-end service industries such as call centers. And my professor got to suffer a near heart attack each time he talks to his Wells Fargo customer service located in Mumbai.
 
Nothing would stop domination of Chinese goods on Indian market if India wants to play by the rules. A better thing India can do than setting protective measures is to raise competitiveness of make in India.

Indian market takes in only a tiny portion of China’s exports, no big deal!

60+ bn USD is a tinny part? You guys rattled when we boycotted some small value chinese goods.

Seriously.
Indian members in this forum show zero knowlage of industries.
Isn't it that English speaking Indians are considered more educated?
Too agrarian a country they are living in?

Typical BS as ever. It is otherz zero Vs 100 of china.
 
Really bro? but they advertised its "officially direct sale" and secret formula directly from India
XW28q5M.jpg
The formula probably orginated from the ancient subcontinent, but I don't think any modern Indian have ever earned one buck from it.
 
NEW DELHI:
HIGHLIGHTS
  1. Strategic capabilities not targeted against any country: India
  2. Abide by international obligations, expect others to do the same: India
  3. China had said it hoped launch complied with UN Security Council rules

Responding to China's reaction to its test-firing of the Agni-V intercontinental ballistic missile, India on Tuesday said its strategic capabilities were not targeted against any particular country, adding that while it abides by all applicable international obligations, it expects others do the same. "India's strategic capabilities are not targeted against any particular country. India abides by all the applicable international obligations and hopes that all other do the same. India's strategic autonomy and growing engagement contributes to strategic stability," External Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Vikas Swarup said.

Mr Swarup's remarks came after Chinese Foreign Ministry said it hoped that India's test-firing of the nuclear-capable Agni-V intercontinental ballistic missile or ICBM, that could cover all of China, complied with UN Security Council rules and safeguarded South Asia's strategic balance.


As Beijing maintained that the two nations are "not rivals for competition but partners for cooperation", it took exception to media reports that the successful test of Agni-V was meant to target China.

China's Foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying in Beijing said, "We have noted reports on India's test fire of Agni-V ballistic missile. The UN Security Council has explicit regulations on whether India can develop ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear weapons."


"China always maintains that preserving the strategic balance and stability in South Asia is conducive to peace and prosperity of regional countries and beyond."

On Monday India had successfully test-fired Agni-V, the country's most lethal nuclear-capable inter-continental ballistic missile with a range of over 5,000 km that covers entire China which may also pave the way for user trial of the weapons system and its eventual induction into the Strategic Forces Command (SFC).

(With inputs from PTI)

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/afte...e-test-indias-curt-response-1642498?site=full
 
Back
Top Bottom