What's new

China-India Geopolitics: News & Discussions

Chinese FM was in Pakistan right after the Sikkim episode and had lengthy meetings with COAS and others. A decision was taken that if the Indians don't ease of on its aggressive and fake rhetoric Bipin's bluff on being able to fight both China and Pakistan will be called.
At the time of Sikkim episode our PM was in US and it was decision was taken US along with SCS nations will buzz the Chinese in SCS and India on the other side ,that's the reason US Navy sailed with on 12 nml of the Chinese occupied island.
 
.
there are some hot zones where army has presence but the numbers are limited, Indian army has presence everywhere but lead is still with BSF and ITBP on Border areas and CRPF and other para militaries for anti terrorist operations.
70000 regular troops are deployed in kashmir and more hot zone in opposite to sialkoy bhimber and you got entire corps deployed at siachen
 
. .
No one have signed that pakistan accept or recognised the instrument of accession.

You do not have that luxury since many states have merged into pakistan using the same instrument of accession.

If you de-recognized the instrument of accession, ALL of your principle state will again become independent and can technically join India or any other country in the world including the US.
 
. .
you have a false understanding of what he said.he mean is that the area and border of china-bhutan maybe is distuped ,but border of china-hindu is no disputed,so ,your army should enter the area from disputed border of china-bhutan not border of china-hindu,are you understand?

What is china hindu ?....Quote me when you reach a higher understanding of nations.
 
.
i dont want to come out as warmonger, but what is stopping China from free run in bhutan and other disputed territories? most of (million+) bharati soldiers are busy on western border with Pakistan... they cant mobilize them with ease if Pakistan wills.
Most of the population of Bhutan is trained as militia and India have Army+paramilitary + exiled army of Tibet (SFF) there.
 
.
New Delhi: China on Tuesday ruled out a compromise in the military standoff with India in the Sikkim section, and put the onus on New Delhi to resolve the “grave” situation.

In unusually blunt remarks, China’s Ambassador to India Luo Zhaohui said “the ball is in India’s court” and it was for the Indian government to decide what options could be on the table to resolve the standoff.

Asked about remarks by official Chinese media and think- tanks that the conflict can lead to a “war” if not handled properly, the ambassador said in an interview to PTI: “There has been talk about this option, that option. It is up to your government policy (whether to exercise military option).”

''China will have to take military way if India doesn't listen''

The Chinese government is very clear that it wants peaceful resolution at current state of the situation for which withdrawal of Indian troops from the area is a “pre- condition”, he asserted.

“The first priority is that the Indian troops unconditionally pull back to the Indian side of the boundary. That is the precondition for any meaningful dialogue between China and India,” he said.

China and India have been engaged in a standoff in the Dokalam area near the Bhutan trijunction for past 19 days after a Chinese army’s construction party came to build a road.

Doka La is the Indian name for the region which Bhutan recognises as Dokalam, while China claims it as part of its Donglang region.

COMPLETE COVERAGE: INDIA-CHINA STANDOFF

China and Bhutan are engaged in talks over the resolution of the area. Bhutan, however, has no diplomatic ties with China and it is supported militarily and diplomatically by India.

“The situation is grave and made me deeply worried. It is the first time that Indian troops have crossed the mutually recognised boundary and trespassed into China’s territory, triggering a close range face off between Chinese and Indian border troops. Now 19 days have passed, but the situation still has not eased,” Luo said.

He also asserted that India has no right to interfere with the China-Bhutan boundary talks, nor is it entitled to make territorial claims on behalf of Bhutan.
http://www.msn.com/en-in/news/newsi...h-india/ar-BBDLlY0?li=AAaeRVN&ocid=spartanntp
 
. . .
So what else will you do if somebody encroaches your boundary,sit idle?

According to many of the international news sources that I've seen, India is making all these moves on behalf of Bhutan and is the aggressor in this case. It is taking the stance that it has a moral obligation in the light of some military pact with Bhutan. This means it is not the main aggrieved party and so cannot claim being a victim of encroachment, unless it considers Bhutan its colony.
 
.
According to many of the international news sources that I've seen, India is making all these moves on behalf of Bhutan and is the aggressor in this case. It is taking the stance that it has a moral obligation in the light of some military pact with Bhutan. This means it is not the main aggrieved party and so cannot claim being a victim of encroachment, unless it considers Bhutan its colony.
We were responsible for bhutanis land security.
 
. .
No it doesnot matter its called illegal oppression and ocupation and fraud
Nizam wanted hyderbad to stay independent but u attack n capture it against the politticall will of king because population was hindu
N in kashmir u accpted political will instead population will double standerd
Go to a corner.
Then Cry.
 
.
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom