What's new

China-India Geopolitics: News & Discussions

Another warning from the same 50 cent army.



So far we are the one that hear same warning again and again

As an elite member, you should have known calling others 50 cent army without any proof is a personal insult.

I don't understand why Indian members here chanting "warnings, warnings" with such an enthusiasm, as if you were eager to see the dead bodies of your front soldiers. :what:
 
. .
As an elite member, you should have known calling others 50 cent army without any proof is a personal insult.

I don't understand why Indian members here chanting "warnings, warnings" with such an enthusiasm, as if you were eager to see the dead bodies of your front soldiers. :what:

All we are trying to explain is that say something that you can implement in ground or at least a warning in a week for sake of less boredom and embarrassment for Chinese.
In here it is just empty vessel.
 
.
All we are trying to explain is that say something that you can implement in ground or at least a warning in a week for sake of less boredom and embarrassment for Chinese.
In here it is just empty vessel.

We do not want to see blood shed, either from Chinese or from Indians, and that is why China has been very restraint in advocating military solution. But it seems you guys take China's restraint as a sign of weakness, and resort to none stop taunting.

It seems quite odd that the winner of last war trying to avoid blood shed, but the loser is asking for more. Just exactly from where you guys found this level of cockiness?
 
. .
We do not want to see blood shed, either from Chinese or from Indians, and that is why China has been very restraint in advocating military solution. But it seems you guys take China's restraint as a sign of weakness, and resort to none stop taunting.

It seems quite odd that the winner of last war trying to avoid blood shed, but the loser is asking for more. Just exactly from where you guys found this level of cockiness?

Then donot churn out daily boring warnings .Chinese would have been like to see bloodshed if it was a sure winning war .
But you are not .

Winner of last war was us in 1967 and we also asking negotiation not a war
 
.
An ignorant man who is good at play populism and leading India into a n expected devastation.


You guys have no vision, just a bunch of street rogues feel complacent for some small gain. You will lose 10 times than what you have gained by phucking with China. If you want to run a arm race with China, suit yourself. I don't know whether your pocket is deep enough to handle it.

No NSG memberships or Permanent membership of UNSC for you, unless you can defeat China.

Let us see how long will Modi government insist. He won't be long.

India will have to live China's shadow, only we can contain from doing bad.
Read history.India is the country which proposed permanent seat for china UN.
 
.
As an elite member, you should have known calling others 50 cent army without any proof is a personal insult.

I don't understand why Indian members here chanting "warnings, warnings" with such an enthusiasm, as if you were eager to see the dead bodies of your front soldiers. :what:
He was offended when I asked him what does "Nangi Bhooki Indians" mean.
So its okay for an elite member to call us 50 cents?
@PaklovesTurkiye
 
.
He was offended when I asked him what does "Nangi Bhooki Indians" mean.
So its okay for an elite member to call us 50 cents?
@PaklovesTurkiye

It is hypocrisy, nothing else...

Pakistan stands with China :tup:

Please read a message that I am gonna paste on your wall regarding Hindi and Urdu...I copied it from comment section of that youtube video I showed to you...
 
.
India is so despicable. India is starting a war in Doklam to destroy everything China is trying to do. If a war breaks out and spread all along the Sino-Indo border it will mess up all the cooperation in SCO, the One Belt One Road, the AIIB Bank and BRICS.
China is so honorable and allow India into the SCO and even allow an Indian to in the board of Director and founding member of AIIB. Yet they are so willing to destroy it all. So despicable these people. They may not even care if they win or not they just want to pull China down into the same shit that they are in.

They are just a mole planted by US.
Running dogs !
 
.
Read history.India is the country which proposed permanent seat for china UN.
Nehru was blinded by short term interests back stabbing China.

He was quite nice in the first beginning. But was enticed by the aspiration for lands and he forget where he is coming from. And the instigation from USA and Soviet played a major rule as well.

He failed to control his ambitions, and we had divergence in how to deal with Dalai Lama as well.

Nehru didn't like China recover Tibet.
 
.
And he is the main plotter of the Doklang invasion, he is a warmonger.

And he pretends to be a saint visiting China.



BJP is a notorious roguery, and will be kicked out of power after defeat by a China.
Catch him if you can or if you have ball.
Then next time let Xi visit India , we will throw him in Tihaar jail. And you really don't have any idea what Tihar jail is!!:lol:
 
. .
Then donot churn out daily boring warnings .Chinese would have been like to see bloodshed if it was a sure winning war .
But you are not .

Winner of last war was us in 1967 and we also asking negotiation not a war

There is not 3rd party account about 1967 incident and China side has a totally different story, so let's just leave it. The outcome of 1962 border war well documented and recognized by the whole world, including Indian government.

Thus far, the war has been fought on the media on both countries, and warnings are necessary steps to avoid further escalation. A wise man will try to sort out conflict with reasoning first, and hope other get the message. In a civilized world, the raw force is always the last resort.

We are closely monitoring the tone of official statements, and looking for some particular phases. When the time comes, you will be posted.

India repeats mistakes of 1962 with continued violation of China's sovereignty, I mean India is emphasized that India is echoing events of 1962 with continued violation of China's sovereignty. Beijing's historical claim dates back to the Convention between Great Britain and China relating to Sikkim and Tibet (1890), an agreement that has been repeatedly reconfirmed under a UN Charter, in writing, by successive Indian governments. But despite the treaty, Indian has continued its aggressive and dangerous stance toward China and enacted the false notion that their presence inside China's border is at the request of Bhutan. However, since 1980, China and Bhutan have held 24 separate border negotiations. Although a boundary has not officially been demarcated, both countries have a clear consensus on the practical condition of the border line. Despite the growing risk to their sovereignty, Chinese forces in the years prior to 1962 did not engage in conflict with the Indian side. China instead issued a series of warnings and urged India to hold negotiations.

These Indians who simply calls Chinese warnings and nothing else should remind back in 1962, Those warnings became more and more explicit but constantly ignored until October 1962, the Chinese at last met this constant Indian military pressure with an overwhelming, crushing counterattack. the devastating battle was a humiliation for India's political class and viewed by the Indian government as a stark warning by China.

The Henderson-Brooks Report, which was the Indian Army's own account of the events of the war, makes quite clear the truth ... that it was Indian provocations that brought about a forewarned Chinese counterattack.

And today is the same case where Indians calling some people as cheerleaders and calling Chinese warnings as bluffs, but back in 1962 worse and humiliated crushing defeat of India at the hands of China they brought a Chinese counter attack upon themselves by their own wrong-headed border policy.


One who is not capable of introspection is bound to repeat the same mistake.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom