What's new

China has been backing NE ultras since 1960s

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
SOURCE: ASSAM TRIBUNE

NE2-890x395.jpg


In recent years, the Government of India has been taking up the issue of militants of the Northeast using Chinese weapons with the Government of China. But the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States of America had reported about the Chinese help to the militants of the region 50 years back.

The US Government has declassified some of the CIA reports and one such report was on ‘India’s Troubled Eastern Region’. The report was submitted on July 26, 1968 and from the report it is evident that the militant groups of the Northeast were receiving help from China even during that time.

The report said, “it is evident that China is interested in the rebellions in the North East and is providing modest arms and training assistance, at least to the Naga rebels. That increased Indian concern over the security of the area.”

The report said that the Naga rebels first established contacts with China in December, 1966. The report revealed that the first batch of approximately 200 rebels crossed over to Northern Burma (now Myanmar) to obtain arms training in Yunan.

The CIA report revealed that in a clash near Kohima in 1968, the Army discovered that the rebels were in possession of Chinese-made small arms and mortars as well as diaries, radio sets and other materials. The discovery of Chinese arms caused New Delhi to fire off a protest to China charging it of aiding the rebels and training subversive elements.

The CIA observed that though India was annoyed with the Chinese meddling with the rebellion in the Northeast, “it is not expected that the Chinese will provide more than small arms and training assistance to the rebels, which the Chinese can provide at little expense to itself.”

It may be mentioned here that for years, the security agencies of India have been claiming that the militant groups have been receiving weapons from China and most of the arms used by the militants are made in the ordnance factories of the neighbouring country. There have also been reports that batches of militants received training in China. The Government of India has also been informing China that several senior leaders of the militant groups have been staying in China, particularly in Yunan province.

Though China had always been denying such reports, only recently, China has started changing its stand on the issue after it started facing similar problem in Jinjiang province. India and China have signed a memorandum of understanding to jointly combat terrorism and the ground modalities are being worked out.

http://idrw.org/china-has-been-backing-ne-ultras-since-1960s/
 
.
So if India has objection on Chinese weapons it can allow rebels to use Made in Dara Ak47.
 
.
I adivse Nagas along with Assamese carry out "noviolence no cooperation" to achieve independence and freedom. UN send an observer committee to assure the peaceful national constructions.
 
.
I adivse Nagas along with Assamese carry out "noviolence no cooperation" to achieve independence and freedom. UN send an observer committee to assure the peaceful national constructions.
There is not much support for independence in these states, only the fringe elements ask for independence.
Maoism has also taken a huge beating now.
So I don't think China has much influence in India's internal matters.
 
.
There is not much support for independence in these states, only the fringe elements ask for independence.

Maoism has also taken a huge beating now.

So I don't think China has much influence in India's internal matters.

greater bengal - Copy.jpg
 
.
There is not much support for independence in these states, only the fringe elements ask for independence.
Maoism has also taken a huge beating now.
So I don't think China has much influence in India's internal matters.

In the first place in 1940's during British gave South Asian independence and freedom, Nagas, Assamese, Manipures had expressed active claims and movement preferring to independence. Unfortunatly they lacked a politician like Jannah or Gandhi. Actually British had agreed their special status, and they had free rights of choosing independence. Indian army invaded into those nations and the suppression continues till today. China is an observer, it stands by and will give them necessary supports when they seek our help.
 
.
In the first place in 1940's during British gave South Asian independence and freedom, Nagas, Assamese, Manipures had expressed active claims and movement preferring to independence. Unfortunatly they lacked a politician like Jannah or Gandhi. Actually British had agreed their special status, and they had free rights of choosing independence. Indian army invaded into those nations and the suppression continues till today. China is an observer, it stands by and will give them necessary supports when they seek our help.
I disagree with your post.
But let me understand your concern, if hypothetically the NE gets independence then what form of govt would you like there. A democracy or an oligarchy?
Your same arguments can be said about Tibet and Taiwan, although India does not support independence for Tibet as of today.
 
. .
I disagree with your post.
But let me understand your concern, if hypothetically the NE gets independence then what form of govt would you like there. A democracy or an oligarchy?
Your same arguments can be said about Tibet and Taiwan, although India does not support independence for Tibet as of today.

Nagaland, Assam and Manipure have different history and situation with Tibet and Taiwan.
The biggest difference is India, Nagaland, Assam and Manipure were under British government, along with Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Tibeta and Taiwan before and after colonial (west) period were under China government.
That's why India's independence needs a "Partition of India" issued by British governor Mountbatten. India after independence invading Nagaland, Assam and Manipure like Vietnam invaded Cambodia and Laos though they were all under French colony. Your occupation has natural political defect.
 
.
Nagaland, Assam and Manipure have different history and situation with Tibet and Taiwan.
The biggest difference is India, Nagaland, Assam and Manipure were under British government, along with Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Tibeta and Taiwan before and after colonial (west) period were under China government.
That's why India's independence needs a "Partition of India" issued by British governor Mountbatten. India after independence invading Nagaland, Assam and Manipure like Vietnam invaded Cambodia and Laos though they were all under French colony. Your occupation has natural political defect.
You have still not answered my previous question about democracy and oligarchy.
Kindly answer it so that I can decide if I should continue a conversation with you.
 
.
Nagaland, Assam and Manipure have different history and situation with Tibet and Taiwan.
The biggest difference is India, Nagaland, Assam and Manipure were under British government, along with Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Tibeta and Taiwan before and after colonial (west) period were under China government.
That's why India's independence needs a "Partition of India" issued by British governor Mountbatten. India after independence invading Nagaland, Assam and Manipure like Vietnam invaded Cambodia and Laos though they were all under French colony. Your occupation has natural political defect.
lol , you claim South China Sea on some old age document , while in India " Nagaland" was well established land before Britisher came also.

Tibet case is also same as NE....
 
.
But let me understand your concern, if hypothetically the NE gets independence then what form of govt would you like there. A democracy or an oligarchy?
It is none of Chinese business.

So I don't think China has much influence in India's internal matters.
Very likely that Burma has bigger influence than China.
 
.
It is none of Chinese business.


Very likely that Burma has bigger influence than China.
Ok you have a very straight forward answer
'it is non of China's business' and I agree completely.
 
.
You have still not answered my previous question about democracy and oligarchy.
Kindly answer it so that I can decide if I should continue a conversation with you.

India is a slum, Nagaland, Assam and Manipure will do better than India. Keep your sick caste system off these nations.

lol , you claim South China Sea on some old age document , while in India " Nagaland" was well established land before Britisher came also.

Tibet case is also same as NE....

Need me repeat again? You were the same colony with Nagaland, which had parallel relationship with India under British. How about you claim Pakistan, Bagladesh, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Maldives are India' territory, you know they all belonged to "India". They will give you a shiit response, this why Indian still can't convince Nagas, Assamese, Manipures after about 70 years occupation. Their independence is the natural rights the same with Indian in 1947.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom