Nilgiri
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 24,797
- Reaction score
- 81
- Country
- Location
We tend to think of use of N weapons very casually but remember any first use of N weapons apart from the fact that it is going to bring some kind of proportionate or disproportionate retaliation, also makes you utterly isolated in world community.
China is one of the biggest economies in the world but a large part of that is based on exports of services and finished goods for which you need markets and by extension good trade relations (more so with China given that have huge trade surpluses with most countries they trade with).
There is no hiding from the fact that China is militarily and economically miles ahead of India but the fact remains it is as vulnerable to established rules and principles of global diplomacy as anybody else.
In (hypothetical) case of a war, both countries are going to suffer but in the end there are going to be 2 looser parties.
Chinese leadership understands there aren't many genuinely happy powers in world that are ok with Chinese might on world forums and they will pounce upon any single opportunity if situation with China and any of its neighbors turn hot.
For India, it is simply the case that we can't afford war right now with several sectors of economy demanding resources.
Therefore diplomacy and mature understanding and resolution of whatever issues remain best bet for India and China (or any other nations for that matter).
@Chinese-Dragon @Joe Shearer @jbgt90 @Nilgiri @Arsalan
Bada bhai, not much use.
This guy literally screaming there will be 1000+ jets operating out of what... 5 tibet PLAAF bases (that could arguably handle and base it)? He has done zilch war modelling.
Just picks a few brochure items and copy paste it however many times his feelings dictate it into his emotional head.
Next to no idea about what deployment rates are, sortie rates are, maximum ordinance delivery rates are, logistical pressure rates, effective support rates....you name it (that controls the total projected platform envelope, even assuming a platform has been fully tested, adopted and most importantly integrated into the C4I in the first place...which J-20 is far from having done so, that too in the relevant numbers notably given the other priority theatre concerns of China)
He is the Bangladeshi Feng Leng basically.... @Mage would understand
How about 1000 4th and 5th get aircraft that PLAAF now has?
Resorting to your usual self of talking nonsense when you have no real point again it seems.
Even the 28 J-20s(obviously more by now) that Wiki mentions from last year are enough to ground the whole of the IAF.
You don't get it do you? Even if (and that is a key if to begin with) there is a lethal so called "game changer" asset....it still has to rely on weaker conventional stuff.
Or you telling me a J-20 has infinite air time and infinite ordnance and infinite fuel etc? Any rules a platform is subject to in regular way....simply makes those the newer optimum targeting windows.
You understand how the USN projected itself in areas of yamato-threat/heavy IJN operation well before its core assets arrived? You don't read anything (past wiki apparently) and you assume to know everything. Bad combo.
Like I said from the start (after you stupidly tagged me here thinking your ludicrous stuff will stick to the wall)...you keep assuming one/two hands held back in Indian case. Trust me, those PLAAF air bases become targets right away (for such things as brahmos saturation attacks)...PLAAF knows this too....its why they wouldnt escalate to such a level in first place regarding this.
It is just your mental masturbation in the end....that you cannot comprehend that yes India gets to just reply this way, and the reply sticks each time. You are the one's that get stuck with 2 million returnees and can't do squat about it. Better go fix that before doing your dreams about the big guys.