What's new

China Export Growth Slides 10% In September to $184.5 Billion, Lowest Since February

Around 65-66 billion dollars.
Pls not "around". Quote exact number from Indian authority with links.

btw, can u tell me how employment is monitored in India with such massive population hired in unofficial sectors and a larger number of fresh graduates entering the job market left disappointed?
 
.
. . . .
Where is your claim "65-66 billion" and how about employment?

You asked me only trade figures.

Earlier I reported figures from this site:
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/india/exports

You wanted official, so I just quoted the most official source, straight from the commerce ministry. Thet link I have given gives both August numbers and April-August numbers.
 
.
You asked me only trade figures.

Earlier I reported figures from this site:
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/india/exports

You wanted official, so I just quoted the most official source, straight from the commerce ministry. Thet link I have given gives both August numbers and April-August numbers.
Wow look at those numbers, 21 billion for August? One tenth of China's monthly figure?

For 1.3 billion population, that's a joke right?
 
.
Wow look at those numbers, 21 billion for August? One tenth of China's monthly figure?

For 1.3 billion population, that's a joke right?

Yes, but China's exports are declining, while India's are stagnant.

Plus, India has a lot of room to grow.

Wow look at those numbers, 21 billion for August? One tenth of China's monthly figure?

For 1.3 billion population, that's a joke right?

China's exports were not much more in the 90s, when it had a population of around a billion. I am sure you would have said this then for China, wouldn't you?

My country has been late in waking up, but I think it has woken up, and would now grow at 7% for the next 25 years.
 
.
Wow look at those numbers, 21 billion for August? One tenth of China's monthly figure?

For 1.3 billion population, that's a joke right?

Of course it is, the whole bloody thing is a joke :mad::mad: Before the British arrived we were known as the Golden bird and now the only adjectives somebody uses is either Toiler or Poverty
Fortunately things are improving and in a couple of years we will be able to fix this catastrophe
 
.
Yes, but China's exports are declining, while India's are stagnant.

Plus, India has a lot of room to grow.



China's exports were not much more in the 90s, when it had a population of around a billion. I am sure you would have said this then for China, wouldn't you?

My country has been late in waking up, but I think it has woken up, and would now grow at 7% for the next 25 years.
Room to grow? Of course, woulda shoudla coulda, wake me up when that happens LMAO
 
.
Trade among asian countries is going to grow as there are many developing countries and west will decline. I think ppl here should stop this useless d**** measuring contest. Any decline in trade by big 3 in asia & south east asia will affect the whole region as the economies are getting interconnected and dependent on each other.
 
.
Trade among asian countries is going to grow as there are many developing countries and west will decline. I think ppl here should stop this useless d**** measuring contest. Any decline in trade by big 3 in asia & south east asia will affect the whole region as the economies are getting interconnected and dependent on each other.
You are very right.
The exports of China, South Korea and Japan, the biggest 3 in Asia do have huge impacts on global trade.
Countries in Asia should work together as a whole!
 
Last edited:
.
No, the figures about trade are right from the Chinese authorities, they are credible.

I am talking mainly about the credibility of GDP data, and unemployment numbers.

Chinese GDP data is estimated by World Bank, IMF and CIA World Factbook. All three outsiders finds similar data with Chinese official figures.

If you want to make such a claim and want to be taken seriously, you should find a past case. Find a data that Chinese government manipulated. Then find/measure true data. Then prove such an error is statiatically significant and contains clear manipulation then we can have a discussion.

Otherwise it means nothing to say "China is manipulating data". Let me give you my bold claim. Chinese shadow economy is larger then their western counterparts. Hence probably, let alone smaller, Chinese economy is larger then the official figure.
 
.
Yes, but China's exports are declining, while India's are stagnant.

Plus, India has a lot of room to grow.



China's exports were not much more in the 90s, when it had a population of around a billion. I am sure you would have said this then for China, wouldn't you?

My country has been late in waking up, but I think it has woken up, and would now grow at 7% for the next 25 years.
Do some Googling, will you? China's export in 1999 is less than 1/10 of current export volume.
 
.
China Focus: Q3 trade growth rebounds, pressure remains
(Xinhua) 14:46, October 13, 2016

FOREIGN201610131445000507694655468.jpg


BEIJING, Oct.13-- China's trade growth rebounded in the third quarter of this year thanks to policy support and a stabilizing economy, but is still facing complex domestic and global challenges.

Foreign trade in the first three quarters was down 1.9 percent from a year earlier to reach 17.53 trillion yuan (2.61 trillion U.S.dollars), with exports dropping 1.6 percent and imports falling 2.3 percent,according to figures from the General Administration of Customs (GAC) on Thursday.

In breakdown, Q3 trade showed signs of stabilization with exports and imports gaining growth of 0.4 percent and 2.1 percent, while those in the previous two quarters both recorded falls.

China's trade slowdown appears to be bottoming out, said Huang Songping, spokesperson with GAC, citing the effects of previous supportive policies, improving market sentiment and rising imports demands thanks to growing economic activities.

Foreign trade with countries included in the China-proposed Belt and Road initiative posted strong growth momentum during the January-September period, with trade with Pakistan, Russia, Poland, Bangladesh and India climbing 14.9 percent, 14 percent, 11.7 percent, 9.6 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively, year on year, GAC data showed.

This is mainly due to increasing economic and trade cooperation between China and countries along the Belt and Road, and China would continue to enhance customs collaboration to promote regional trade facilitation, Huang said.

Despite positive growth signs, Huang pointed out that the foundation for sustainable trade rebound is not solid as China still faces complex domestic and international challenges that might undermine trade growth for some time.

World trade will grow more slowly than expected in 2016, expanding by just 1.7 percent, well below the April forecast of 2.8 percent and recording the slowest pace of trade growth since the financial crisis of 2009, according to the latest WTO estimates.

The country's September trade data missed market expectations. Exports measured in yuan terms fell 5.6 percent year on year, reversing a 5.9-percent rise in August while imports slowed from rising 10.8 percent last month to just 2.2 percent.

The fall in exports occurred despite favorable moves in China's exchange rate, which should have boosted competitiveness. The Chinese currency has declined 0.8 percent against the U.S.dollar since its Oct.1 inclusion in the IMF's SDR basket, breaking through the critical 6.7 threshold.

Chinese yuan depreciation might benefit domestic exporters, but would also raise their imports costs of production materials as processing trade still remained a major part of of China's trade pattern, Huang said.

Huang also pointed out rising protectionism has added to the headwinds,as China suffered 85 trade remedy investigations worth 10.3 billion U.S.dollars from 20 countries and regions in the past eight months.

Trade is a somewhat volatile series and so numbers for individual months need to be treated with caution as a sign of trend, Bloomberg Chief Asia Economist Tom Orlik pointed out in a research note, adding that a higher base for comparison might weight on the September growth data.

Export order readings in both the National Bureau of Statistics and the Caixin PMIs for September are just slightly above 50, pointing to a modest recovery in external demand.

China did not specify a trade growth target for 2016. The government would continue to implement supportive polices to cut red tapes and reduce costs for trade firms in the next three months to stabilize trade growth, Huang said.
http://en.people.cn/n3/2016/1013/c90000-9126617.html
 
.
Back
Top Bottom