oFFbEAT
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,861
- Reaction score
- -33
- Country
- Location
I don't think so, read the post just above your post.....I am sure if no death penalty , the mumber of victims will be higher.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think so, read the post just above your post.....I am sure if no death penalty , the mumber of victims will be higher.
The United States remained the only country in the Americas that carries out executions. The state of Texas accounted for 41 percent of them.
I do not think so .I don't think so, read the post just above your post.....
I don't think so, read the post just above your post.....
They are hanged, in so called 'rarest of the rare cases'......If you hang these rapist in India, Rape crime will much reduced I believe...
If death penalty is indeed a deterrent then why each year the number of executions are more or less same??.......
They are hanged, in so called 'rarest of the rare cases'......
Anyway, if you believe death-penalty can reduce crime, then why the number of death penalty increases each year in countries like Iran etc...
They are hanged, in so called 'rarest of the rare cases'......
Anyway, if you believe death-penalty can reduce crime, then why the number of death penalty increases each year in countries like Iran etc...
1. Drug dealer with >= 50g illeagle narcotics, Dealth in China !
2. An adult man rape girl <=16 age, Dealth in China !
3. Murder one person's life (include baby), Dealth in China !
4. Terrorist also Dealth in China !
@hans and @STEVEN囧, I agree to all your points, I'm not saying that China should abolish death penalty.....I'm only trying to logically proove that the notion that death-penalty reduces crime is not actually true......it instills fear and checks crime ofcourse but there are better alternatives like social reforms etc......
Anyway, if you believe death-penalty can reduce crime, then, don't you think, considering that China executes the highest number of people on this planet, will have the lowest crime rate.....and if China has the lowest crime rate then how come it executes the highest number of people??
A paradox isn't it.......
I'll give you an example that shows the death penalty is necessary. In China there is a law: In any kidnap case, if the victim loses life for any reason during the crime process. The kidnapper(s) will be 100% sure to face death penalty. You know all kidnappers tend to kill the victims for their safety sake. I believe this law saved many innocent victims in the kidnap crimes.That is the point........death penalty or not, the crime rate remains more or less stable......
The notion that the crime rate will increase if death penalty is abolished, has been proven wrong by the crime statistics of the countries which has abolished it, like Britain etc.
Therefore, as pointed out, death penalty does not reduce crime, it only provides satisfaction to the natural need for revenge that humans have.........which, by the way, is not justified by the Judiciary of many countries(including India) where death-penalty is practiced........this condemnation of the notion of revenge while keeping the death penalty seems contradictory to me.....
IMHO, social reforms can reduce crime rate.......
@hans and @STEVEN囧, I agree to all your points, I'm not saying that China should abolish death penalty.....I'm only trying to logically proove that the notion that death-penalty reduces crime is not actually true......it instills fear and checks crime ofcourse but there are better alternatives like social reforms etc......
Anyway, if you believe death-penalty can reduce crime, then, don't you think, considering that China executes the highest number of people on this planet, will have the lowest crime rate.....and if China has the lowest crime rate then how come it executes the highest number of people??
A paradox isn't it.......