What's new

China ends Japanese and South Korean Monopoly!!!!!!!!

OK


Still do.


Such as?


I will give you military and deep space flight, civilian no.


Nope. Koreans own the fundamental core technology patents, Chinese just assemble parts.


Chinese are roughly 10 years behind Koreans in high speed rail technology. Speeding up Japanese Shinkansen beyond Japanese design speed limit is not an innovation, but recklessness. Do you still not understand why Russia excluded Chinese bidders from bidding on high speed railway equipment(Only French, German, and Korean bidders allowed to bid) and Texas didn't even bother to invite China to bid?


Chinese solar panels are ancient obsolete types whose production requires pollution emission and is banned in western countries.


Nope


???


China is a nuclear power plant importing nation.
Korea is a nuclear power plant exporting nation.


Good luck with thorium for the next 30 years. Thorium won't get you anywhere.


China has no advantage over others in this field, and Chinese are actually behind Koreans. How do I know? International ITER tokamack reactor is based on the KSTAR reactor and uses the KSTAR's superconducting core design.

Update on KSTAR, a pilot device for ITER
Nuclear Engineering International




China is overrun by foreign automakers with a 70% market share of Chinese domestic market. Try to take back China's domestic market from foreigners before going overseas.

china is ahead in renewable technology, nuclear tech, high speed rail, aerospace, energy, construction, supercomputer and pretty much everthing.

korea just has couple of years lead in semiconductor and flat panel display.
 
.
Koreans do not own fundamental patents on telecom. If they did, they would have something like Alcatel or Huawei or Sony Ericsson but they don't. Korea is nowhere to be seen in this field.

On Korea's ultra high tech train technology:

Daegu subway fire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
March 28, 1993 – According to South Korean Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation television report, a Seoul–Busan express train derailed, when an express train was moving at normal speed approaching Busan station, suddenly 33 yards of rail track collapsed, and eight passenger cars plunged, where caused by 13-feet from caved in tracks at near Busan, South Korea, killing 79 people.

March 24, 1997 – According to South Korean Seoul Broadcasting System television report, a Seoul bound passenger train smashed into packed local bus, where flipped a vehicle onto railroad side at Namwon, North Jeolla, South Korea, killing 14 and injuring 20

Korean trains? NO! French trains, Korean paint.

Korea Train Express - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Korea Train eXpress (KTX) is South Korea's high-speed rail system, operated by Korail. Construction began on the first section of the high-speed line from Seoul to Busan in 1992. The project was later split into two phases and combined with conventional line upgrades, adding a second route from Seoul to Mokpo. The system's technology is largely based on the French TGV/LGV system.

Top speed for trains in regular service is currently 305 km/h (190 mph), though the infrastructure is designed for 350 km/h (217 mph). The initial rolling stock, designated KTX-I, was based on Alstom's TGV Réseau, and was partly built in Korea within the framework of a technology transfer.
 
.
Koreans do not own fundamental patents on telecom. If they did, they would have something like Alcatel or Huawei or Sony Ericsson but they don't.

Samsung aims to get to No. 3 infrastructure spot without acquisitions - FierceWireless

Samsung aims to get to No. 3 infrastructure spot without acquisitions

February 27, 2012 — 12:19pm ET | By Phil Goldstein

Samsung aims to displace Huawei in infrastructure market by 2015

BARCELONA, Spain--Samsung expects to achieve the No. 3 LTE infrastructure vendor position by the end of 2012 and crack the top three infrastructure vendor rankings overall by the end of 2015 through organic growth, a senior executive said.

In a roundtable with reporters here at Mobile world Congress, IP Hong, head of marketing for Samsung's telecommunications business, reiterated many points he and other Samsung executives have made in the past about the company's infrastructure ambitions. However, he said an acquisition of another vendor is not in the cards. "We are going to achieve that market position by ourselves at this point," he said.

Samsung's key advantage is that Chinese telecom equipment are banned in the US, so Samsung grabs 50% of the US 4G wireless telecom infrastructure business.

Korea?s ETRI: world top agency in patents

Korea’s ETRI: world top agency in patents

As far as patents are concerned, Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) is second to none, according to an annual survey by a U.S.-based journal.

Intellectual Property Today said in its April edition that ETRI topped the list in patent-related prowess out of 237 universities, state-backed agencies and research centers across the world.

The University of California came in second followed by the Industrial Technology Research Institute, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the U.S. Navy and Stanford University.

``ETRI leads the initial scorecard with the highest patenting activity within the group combined with an average industry impact of 1.01,’’ the monthly said in an article.

Korea is nowhere to be seen in this field.
Educate and stop embarrassing yourself.

Korean trains? NO! French trains, Korean paint.
KTX-II and HEMU-430X are all local designs. Unlike China, Korea respects foreign intellectual property and never attempted to export the TGV model; they were merely used to learn how to engineer a bullet train. The KTX-II is all local and this is why Alstom doesn't protest while competing against it in Russia, US, and Brazil, unlike Kawasaki threatening to sue China's CSR if they attempted to sell CRH380 in the US and Europe.
 
.
China has no advantage over others in this field, and Chinese are actually behind Koreans. How do I know? International ITER tokamack reactor is based on the KSTAR reactor and uses the KSTAR's superconducting core design.

Nuclear Fusion Reactor Shows Stronger Power Burst
Scientists at the National Fusion Research Institute said Wednesday that their experimental fusion reactor set a new high by creating plasma that lasted for 3.6 seconds and generated an electric current of 320 kilo amperes (kA.).(in 2009)

In the first experiments, plasma lasted for 249 milliseconds at above 100 kA, with the max current reaching 133 kA. In the recent testing, the goal was to have the plasma last for 2 seconds and achieve a max 300 kA in electrical current.

KSTAR was the second fusion reactor in the world to generate plasma using superconducting material, following China's EAST reactor which achieved the feat in 2006.

The Berkeley Science Review » How I learned to stop worrying and love WikiLeaks
In 2009, IIP [using China's EAST] successfully maintained a 10 million degree Celsius plasma nuclear fusion reaction for 400 seconds( and with density, ne = 2x10^19/m^3 ). One of IIP’s immediate goals is now to maintain a 100 million degree Celsius plasma nuclear fusion reaction for over 400 seconds.


Another Achievement with EAST,
DOE Pulse
An instrument developed by researchers at DOE’s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) has enabled a research team at a fusion energy experiment in China to observe—in startling detail—how a particular type of electromagnetic wave known as a radiofrequency (RF) wave affects the behavior of hot ionized gas.

In the experiment at EAST (the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak located at the Institute of Plasma Physics in Hefei, China), scientists employed a high-resolution, X-ray imaging crystal spectrometer (XICS) to observe how an RF wave changed the way a hot ionized gas known as a plasma moved in a vacuum vessel. Radiofrequency waves are similar to microwaves and are used to heat and drive current in plasma.
...
The results were published in the June 6 edition of Physical Review Letters by researchers from the EAST team and PPPL’s Manfred Bitter and Kenneth Hill. Bitter and Hill are experimentalists who have collaborated for more than 35 years.





ITER cost contribution

EU : 45%
Japan : 9%
Korea : 9%
China : 9%
Russia : 9%
US : 9%
India : 9%

ITER engineering and component contribution

Japan : 25%
Korea : 20%
Russia : 20%
EU : 20%
US : 8%
China : 7%
India : ???

Do you still not get it? China has little to contribute in an international Fusion Reactor project like this. That's the true competitiveness of China's fusion research.

Yeah, just like USA have little to contribute to ITER, eh? China is moving ahead of ITER because it knows ITER is/will have too much bureaucracy and politics to slow it down.
 
. . .
Actually the foreign manufacturers are leaving China, so less is being made in China over time. For example, the ice cubicle I bought the other day had "Made In India" print on it, instead of "Made In China". "Made In Vietnam" and "Made In Sri Lanka" labels are showing on clothing too. It won't be long before "Made In Vietnam" and "Made In India" replaces "Made In China" in the US markets.

You are free to join the Gordon Chang camp but we just steamroll ahead regardless!

(Reuters) - China swung to a surprise trade surplus of $$5.35 billion in March as exports grew faster than expected and import growth eased from a 13-month peak, customs data showed on Tuesday.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/171814-china-swings-surprise-trade-surplus-march.html
 
. .
Actually the foreign manufacturers are leaving China, so less is being made in China over time. For example, the ice cubicle I bought the other day had "Made In India" print on it, instead of "Made In China". "Made In Vietnam" and "Made In Sri Lanka" labels are showing on clothing too. It won't be long before "Made In Vietnam" and "Made In India" replaces "Made In China" in the US markets.


Fortunately for Chinese, Japanese nationalists are blaming Korea for Japan's misery, not China.

Anyhow, Chinese OP don't seem to get the fact that the high-end TV market trend is shifting to large screen OLED TVs, in which Koreans claim 99% market share. It's meaningless to release a product 6 months after your competitor, Japanese fell into that trap and this is why they are struggling, and Chinese aren't 6 months behind; they are 3 years behind in product release cycle.

I would rather it belong in Korea than in China, but I would definitely rather it belong in China than in India or Vietnam.

East Asian feuds is what is killing this region.
 
.
I would rather it belong in Korea than in China, but I would definitely rather it belong in China than in India or Vietnam.

East Asian feuds is what is killing this region.

:woot: great! you changed user ID. Yes, the feuds seem to last because of Japan's war crime. BTW, I think the upcoming FTA between China and South Korea is really a benefit to both of us. While as for Chinese gov, a complete FTA will include China, South Korea and Japan. This FTA is in order to compete with Trans-Pacific Partnership(TPP) which is led by US. Japan is always interested in TPP while South Korea is more interested with the upcoming FTA. Economic benefits are more important.
 
.
Samsung aims to get to No. 3 infrastructure spot without acquisitions - FierceWireless



Samsung's key advantage is that Chinese telecom equipment are banned in the US, so Samsung grabs 50% of the US 4G wireless telecom infrastructure business.

Korea?s ETRI: world top agency in patents




Educate and stop embarrassing yourself.

How many patent the ETRI produce? it is second to none in "agency catagory" right?
While Huawei /ZTE is the second to none in corporation catagory.

KTX-II and HEMU-430X are all local designs. Unlike China, Korea respects foreign intellectual property and never attempted to export the TGV model; they were merely used to learn how to engineer a bullet train. The KTX-II is all local and this is why Alstom doesn't protest while competing against it in Russia, US, and Brazil, unlike Kawasaki threatening to sue China's CSR if they attempted to sell CRH380 in the US and Europe.

KTX-II and HEMU-430 is based on technology transfer from ALSTOM, and it is not world beating either.

Chinese High speed train is also local design, with almost 900 patents.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom