What's new

China Economy Forum

.
Just as I thought.

India is economically finished. Their growth story is all over.

images


:lol::lol::lol:
 
. .
I think India should not be dictated by Nokia.

It's Nokia who need India to make big profit, as labor cost in India is very low and it even lower with the fall of Rupee.

Why should India return the tax that Nokia paid. That is stupid.
 
. .
Let Nokia go to china. India has Micromax local brand, who is doing well and they will capture the market and will become successful. India do not need MNC's to benefit from our middle class it is better our local brands take advantage of the situation.

You do know that those are Chinese mobiles tagged with micromax brand name?
 
.
You do know that those are Chinese mobiles tagged with micromax brand name?

Some components are manufactured in China, It is profitable to manufacture here because India offers middle class to sell products rather than dumping products from another country.

So why we have to give that chance to Nokia when we can do that.

Regarding component manufacture I am sure we can also do that in the near future ..... :cheers:
 
.
Some components are manufactured in China, It is profitable to manufacture here because India offers middle class to sell products rather than dumping products from another country.

So why we have to give that chance to Nokia when we can do that.

Regarding component manufacture I am sure we can also do that in the near future ..... :cheers:

No they are completely Chinese manufactured and designed. A Pakistani company QMobile is doing the same and their sets are identical to micromax.

Some components are manufactured in China, It is profitable to manufacture here because India offers middle class to sell products rather than dumping products from another country.

So why we have to give that chance to Nokia when we can do that.

Regarding component manufacture I am sure we can also do that in the near future ..... :cheers:

No they are completely Chinese manufactured and designed. A Pakistani company QMobile is doing the same and their sets are identical to micromax.
 
. .
No they are completely Chinese manufactured and designed. A Pakistani company QMobile is doing the same and their sets are identical to micromax.


They pick some components from a chain of chinese manufactures which they want to assemble, customize and then sell them for profits.

MicroMax is India based company may be Qmobile has collaboration with Micromax.

As I said earlier, once Micromax improves we can also manufacture the components here, product development is a cycle and there are phases in it.
 
.
They pick some components from a chain of chinese manufactures which they want to assemble, customize and then sell them for profits.

MicroMax is India based company may be Qmobile has collaboration with Micromax.

As I said earlier, once Micromax improves we can also manufacture the components here, product development is a cycle and there are phases in it.

Do a bit of research and you would know what I am talking about. QMobile is not a collaboration with micromax, it just buys from the same OEM, who tags it to whatever brand name you want. If you want to live in denial then be my guest:)
 
.
Do a bit of research and you would know what I am talking about. QMobile is not a collaboration with micromax, it just buys from the same OEM, who is tags it to whatever brand name you want. If you want to live in denial then be my guest:)

How Micromax used China to build its business

The history of Micromax (2011-12 revenue: Rs 1,978 crore or Rs 19.78 billion), which ventured into the mobile phone market in 2008, is one of the most fascinating success stories in the Indian consumer electronics industry.

In barely five years, the company has come to occupy the third position (by volume) in the mobile handset market in India and is at No. 12 globally.

It leads the Indian tablet market with a share of 18.4 per cent, ahead of veterans Samsung and Apple.

The Gurgaon-headquartered company owes its success not just to the ticket it puts on its products or the speed with which it puts new designs on the shelves but to how it has managed these two crucial product inputs by leveraging China.
To be more specific, the labour cost advantage and the production flexibility that China offered.

Big deal, you may say, given that almost every other handset brand in the world manufactures its products in China.

Right from the Apples to the Samsungs to many of our home-grown brands like Karbonn, a whole host of players reaped China's arbitrage advantage.

But here is the stumper: the strategy that offered Micromax its biggest advantage in its first five years is under threat and it will require a re-examination by the company - and a number of other multinationals with Chinese production - of their overall supply-chain strategies.
The reason is simple. At Shenzhen, where some of China's largest electronics manufacturers are located, the minimum wage is set for a 13.3 per cent hike from this year - a move that could have a ripple effect across the world's major technology companies.

According to some estimates, between 2005 and 2010, basic manufacturing wages in the country have soared roughly 70 per cent.

"Eventually, Indian companies sourcing products and components from China need to develop local infrastructure. The reports of underage labourers and inhumane work conditions at some Chinese factories can have a cascading effect on the reputation of brands that source from China," says a telecom expert.

What has made Micromax's life a little more complicated is its recent entry into categories like tablets and LED TVs.

In short, if you were to add the increasing cost of monitoring suppliers and of compliance, that labour cost advantage Micromax enjoyed when it started out looks even more precarious.

To understand what Micromax needs to do here on, we need to first understand how the company harnessed China to reach the Top 5 bracket in the Indian mobile phone market.

In an earlier interview to The Strategist, Rahul Sharma, co-founder, Micromax, had said: "The strategy is simple: create high volumes, reach the customer base through effective distribution, give them products that are innovative and cost-effective. Finally, create a strong brand."

ccording to Mritunjay Kapur, country MD, Protiviti, the world's largest independent business and risk consulting firm, "Players like Micromax are constantly pushing the product profile - they have been able to identify their markets well and be where the customer is."

So, where Micromax takes barely a month or two to launch products, another big international brand requires roughly 18 months for a similar product to go through the retail pipeline.

In effect, Micromax's growth strategy has followed three clear stages, explains an industry insider.

When it started out, the company picked handsets from China, rebadged them and sold them in the India market.

In the second stage, it realised the need to do extensive research in terms of Indian consumers' demands and product development.

Now it has crossed over into a new phase, where the company has started following a mix-and-match strategy - getting some products manufactured in China and other countries, sourcing components from abroad and manufacturing some of the newer lines in India.

"An Apple or a Samsung, which were also getting their products manufactured in China, would demand a mark-up based on the brand value; for a newcomer like Micromax that was never an issue. So they could offer similar features at a lower price," says an industry hand.

"The basic strategy of Micromax has been 'affordable innovation'," says an ex-employee of Micromax.


"Pick up a box (of a mobile handset from any company) and you will see most are produced in China. The country clearly has built economies of scale and knows how to play it right. Why just us, manufacturing across categories is done in China, thanks to the cost efficiencies, eco-system and how they come together," says Mehrotra.

Though Micromax didn't create 'reference designs' initially - preferring to simply give instructions to its third-party manufacturers in China - it's winning strategy was to quickly start its R&D facility, create prototypes and instruct contract manufacturers on what the company expected.

How Micromax used China to build its business - Rediff.com Business

Soon they will do some R&D stuff here .... :cheers:
 
.
. .
Blame USSR for the starvation of million Chinese peasants. Since 1960, they forced China to pay off all the debt, even including the equipments from the Korean War. Then what do you expect Mao to do?

Don't find excuse for Mao. People died, that's his responsibility. You can't omit his fault! Don't bring USSR to cover his guilt. Never take other's mistake for Mao's own failure, OK? Your conclusion is very reluctant!

He is a great strategist, however, he is not capable of managing a country with mature or at least rational economy policy.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom