What's new

China Economy Forum

China needs over 200 bln yuan to fund land reclamation: official - People's Daily Online April 13, 2011

landslide.jpg


China will need to invest at least 200 billion yuan (30.56 billion U.S. dollars) in its efforts to reclaim damaged land masses, an official with the Ministry of Land Resources (MLR) said Tuesday.

China's land reclamation program is in need of heavy funding and the government's investment fell far short of the demand, Wang Shouzhi, head of the MLR's department of policy and regulation, said during a work conference.

Statistics show that China now has around 100 million mu (6.67 million hectares) of land laid to waste by human activity and natural disasters.

"Land reclamation required an average investment of 2,400 yuan per mu during the 2005-2009 period. That means China now needs over 200 billion yuan to address the issue," Wang said.

To date, China has regained over 30 million mu of wasted land in the past two decades, according to Wu Haiyang, director of the Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center with the MLR.

He said that the lack of funds and the negligence of local governments were the major obstacles in the reclamation process.

Experts at the meeting called for incentive mechanisms through legislatures to attract investment.

China put the Land Reclamation Regulations in place in March this year in a bid to regain lost land.

Source: Xinhua
 
.
Beijing banning gasoline cars?
Beijing is a polluted city. Beijing's air was a hot-button issue for the media during the 2008 Olympics. Despite ongoing efforts to clean the air since 1999, things remain pretty bad. In the run up to the Olympics, some 200 factories were shut down or moved out of the city, tens of thousands of coal boilers were replaced with natural gas, Beijing inaugurated the world's largest fleet of natural-gas buses and taxis, and gradually ratcheted-up automobile emission standards until they were among the toughest in the world.

Nonetheless, Beijing remains one of the most polluted cities in the world. To be fair, any city with the population the size of Australia and some 5 million automobiles is bound to be encapsulated in smog.

Beijing's leaders soon realized that the problem was not so much in the industrial sector as it was in the rapid growth in automobiles. Between 1997 and 2011, the number of cars in Beijing quintupled. It didn't matter how many factories were closed or how tight emission standards became, the growth of cars outpaced pollution mitigation efforts.

After the Olympics, Beijing got tough. They began a program that basically made it illegal for car owners to drive one day per week based on the last number of their license plate. If caught driving on a day their car is not allowed on the road, they could be ticketed. They hoped this program would reduce congestion and pollution, but results have been mixed.

Instead, in mid-2009 Beijing began encouraging buyers to purchase plug-in hybrids and electric cars with subsidies of $7,500 and $8,800 respectively. However, those subsidies were initially limited to fleet buyers, (meaning government agencies and companies like taxi services that could be many vehicles in one order.) Thus, the adoption of electric vehicles has been extremely slow.

Now, things are beginning to change. Beijing has begun offering those same subsidies to private vehicle buyers as well. They have also promised to double the subsidies, to some $17,000 to defer the cost of electric vehicles until their price falls.

In 2011 Beijing adopted the most draconian measures yet to reduce congestion and pollution: car rationing. Some 800,000 vehicles were purchased in 2010 alone, but Beijing would only allow a maximum of 240,000 new vehicles in 2011. The rationing is done by lottery, every month 20,000 people are chosen who are eligible for a license plate. This means if one wants to buy a car, they must wait until they win the lottery. They cannot simply buy a car...say..tomorrow.

Here is where it gets interesting. Besides generous subsidies, Beijing is exempting EVs from various taxes (car taxes in China are extremely high), and excepting them from the one-day-per-week driving curfew. But here is the kicker...they will be exempt from the license plate rationing system. That means, if you want to buy a car in Beijing, you have two choices: You can buy an electric tomorrow and get the accompanying benefits OR you can wait until you win the lottery.

In effect, Beijing is making the electric car more attractive than their gasoline counterparts. Clearly they hope that the quieter electric vehicles will replace gasoline ones and make the city less noisy, while cleaning the air, helping Beijing meet China's strict energy efficiency requirements, and making the city less dependent on unstable oil markets.

This doesn't mean that Beijing will become an electric city overnight. There are few electric cars available right now, and production capacity remains low; most electric car makers cannot keep up with demand. But over time, competition and improved technology promises to bring the cost down for everyone.

This piece of news has largely been ignored in the Western media. This is surprising considering all the interest in electric cars right now. China seems poised to beat the US past the 1 million electric vehicle goal set by Obama for 2015. The United States must get its act together or it will be buried in the clean-energy race.
Politikal Matters
 
.
China leads BRICS in global IT industry - People's Daily Online April 14, 2011

China climbed to the 36th position in the rankings of the "Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011: Transformation 2.0," released by the World Economic Forum on April 12, 2011.

Sweden and Singapore continue to lead the rankings, taking first and second place, respectively. The Nordic countries and Asian Tigers confirm their leadership in adopting and implementing ICT advances for increased growth and development. Finland jumped to third place, while Switzerland and the United States are steady in fourth and fifth place, respectively. The 10th anniversary edition of the report focuses on ICT's power to transform society in the next decade through modernization and innovation.

Since 2006, China has leapfrogged 23 positions and is among the 10 most improved countries over five years. The government recognizes the importance of ICT and innovation for the development of the country.

Businesses are relatively quick to adopt new technologies and have developed a taste for innovation. The use of ICT by the population is also increasing rapidly but remains relatively low because of the sheer size of the country.

With a record coverage of 138 economies worldwide, the report remains the world's most comprehensive and authoritative international assessment of the impact of ICT on the development process and the competitiveness of nations. The Networked Readiness Index (NRI), featured in the report, examines how prepared countries are to use ICT effectively in regards to three areas: the general business, regulatory and infrastructure environment for ICT; the readiness of the three key societal actors - individuals, businesses and governments - to use and benefit from ICT; and their actual usage of available ICT.

Under the theme Transformations 2.0, this 10th anniversary edition explores the coming transformations powered by ICT, with a focus on the impact they will have on individuals, businesses and governments over the next few years. Since the beginning of the report, the sheer amount of information generated by today's digital society has increased at an astounding rate.

In order to measure impact of ICT and this new data revolution, a new data sharing platform is also launched on the occasion of the report's 10th anniversary to provide users with a set of tools to explore the impact of information a "ICT, and the Internet in particular, have changed the world dramatically, and all indications point to an even higher rate of transformation of our lives going forward," said Soumitra Dutta, Roland Berger Professor of Business and Technology at INSEAD and co-editor of the report. "As the Global Information Technology Report series enters its second decade, we hope it will continue to provide policymakers and decision leaders from both the public and private sectors a unique reference and tool to address the challenges and opportunities brought about by the transformations 2.0."

"Innovation and ICT have proven a crucial lever for long-term growth, with countless social and economic benefits and the capacity to significantly improve people's life around the world," said Alan Marcus, senior director and head of information technology and telecommunications at the World Economic Forum. "Countries fully integrating new technologies and leveraging the new data revolution in their development and growth strategies, are laying the foundations for competitive, resilient economies for the future."

The report is a project within the framework of the World Economic Forum's Centre for Global Competitiveness and Performance and the Industry Partnership Program for Information Technology and Telecommunications Industries. It is the result of collaboration between the World Economic Forum and INSEAD, the leading international business school.

The Networked Readiness Index uses a combination of data from publicly available sources, as well as the results of the Executive Opinion Survey, a comprehensive annual survey conducted by the World Economic Forum with its network of partner institutes (leading research institutes and business organizations) in the countries included in the report. This survey of over 15,000 executives provides unique data on many qualitative dimensions important to assess national networked readiness.

The presentation of the NRI rankings is followed by contributions by academics and industry experts, exploring the transformations 2.0, including the emerging Internet economy, communities to be built around digital highways, ICT growing impact on poverty reduction, localization 2.0, and the potential of mobile banking in the emerging world, among others. Furthermore, four deep-dive studies on selected national/regional experiences in leveraging ICT for increased competitiveness are included: Costa Rica, Saudi Arabia, as well as broadband approaches and developments in the European Union and United States.

The report contains detailed country profiles for the 138 economies featured in the study, providing a snapshot of each economy's level of ICT penetration and usage. Also included is an extensive section of data tables for the 71 indicators used in the computation of the Index.

The editors of the report are Soumitra Dutta, Roland Berger Professor of Business and Technology, INSEAD, France, and Irene Mia, Director and Senior Economist, Centre for Global Competitiveness and Performance, World Economic Forum.

By Kai Bucher, Cathy Li, WEF
 
.
First there was the one child policy, then came the one dog policy in shanghai. Is there going to be a one car policy or something similar soon, or is there already an unspoken consensus?
 
.
First there was the one child policy, then came the one dog policy in shanghai. Is there going to be a one car policy or something similar soon, or is there already an unspoken consensus?

I think the cars are limited only in Beijing. They can buy more cars in other major Chinese cities.
 
. . .
?????????????_????_???

LOOK AT THIS PART:

五是一些拉美国家饱尝政府频繁更迭和军事政变之苦。例如厄瓜多尔1996年~2003年换了5位总统。2007年的一份研究报告显示,每次发生的社会冲突和政治动荡,都为国家经济和家庭结构带来巨大灾难,导致其经济发展至少倒退10年~15年。

Fifth: Latin American countries have unstable government and frequent military coupes. Ecuador in the years 1996-2003 had changed 5 presidents. In 2007, a government report shows that any social instability or political instability will cause severe damage to both families and the economy, frequently negating up to 10-15 years of growth.
 
.
FT
Global economy: An inflated outlook

By Rahul Jacob and Chris Giles

Published: April 8 2011 22:57 | Last updated: April 8 2011 22:57


The Chinese province of Guangxi might be almost 9,000km from Frankfurt, home of the European Central Bank. But in today’s globalised economy, the two are much closer than they first appear.

Two months ago Zhu Xinzhi, head of a lighting manufacturers’ association in the industrial city of Foshan in southern China, set off for Guangxi on a recruiting trip. Offering a monthly wage of Rmb1,600, he hoped to attract 500 workers; he got 10. Alternative opportunities, high inflation and a recent trend of rising wages made his jobs unattractive. “The workers felt the salary was relatively low and that it’s better to stay home and run their own small business or go to cities with higher pay,” he says. “The salary we offered has no advantage any more. It was a very unsatisfactory trip.”

The reverberations from China’s rising wages, alongside rapid economic growth there and in fellow emerging economies, were felt in far-off Frankfurt this week. That Mr Zhu might have to pay more to recruit workers will raise the price of light bulbs imported into Germany from China. If the process is replicated in the prices of other Chinese goods, inflation in Germany and other European nations will be permanently higher, requiring action by the ECB.

It appears the bank has already begun to take action. On Thursday, the ECB raised interest rates for the first time in three years – initially by only a quarter of a percentage point to 1.25 per cent. Jean-Claude Trichet, president, cited inflationary risks stemming in part from “strong economic growth in emerging markets”, as well as “ample liquidity at the global level, [which] may further fuel commodity price rises”.

It is not just the ECB that looks at China and sees a more inflationary future. This week the People’s Bank of China, the central bank, raised rates for the fourth time since October, as well as taking other action against price rises. Others are expected to follow suit by the end of the year.

The International Monetary Fund expressed concern in the World Economic Outlook published this week that oil scarcity combined with rapid growth in oil-intensive emerging economies would continue pushing oil prices higher year after year. In February James Bullard, president of the St Louis Federal Reserve Bank, raised the question of whether inflationary pressures might mount in the US despite high unemployment because there was little or no slack in the global economy.

The potential worldwide consequences of local trends make it impossible for policymakers to ignore the Chinese labour market and its links to the global economy.

A new era began last summer after a spate of suicides by workers at the Shenzhen plant of contract electronics manufacturer Foxconn, just across the border from Hong Kong. In response the Taiwanese company, which supplies the likes of Apple and Dell, raised wages by about 20 per cent. This was followed by wild-cat strikes at the factories of Honda parts suppliers in the same province, leading salaries there to rise by a similar percentage.

Until that point, says Han Dongfang of workers’ rights group China Labour Bulletin, Beijing through its federation of trade unions had always sided with employers, helping to keep wage increases in check. In a video clip widely circulated online, young white-uniformed workers at the Honda parts plant shouted at representatives of the official government union for beating them and taking the part of their Japanese bosses.

These strikes, says Mr Han, were a “turning point. It became clear [the government union] was channelling employee anger into anger against the government”. This year, the government has signalled its determination to raise workers’ incomes by lifting the benchmark minimum wage by about 20 per cent in Beijing (where it is now Rmb1,232 per month); Guangzhou, capital of the industrialised province next to Hong Kong (to Rmb1,030); and elsewhere.

One of the catalysts for the upward trend in wages is demographic, with a falling number of young Chinese entering the labour market. Although employers are shifting production west, where the supply of workers is higher and wages lower, the sudden rise in pay levels cannot be ignored.

Since China started to integrate into the global trading system in the 1980s, says William Fung, head of the Hong Kong-based $15.9bn global sourcing company Li & Fung, it has “added at least 20 per cent to the world’s workforce, if not more. China became the world’s factory.” Its low wage levels allowed the rest of the world to “enjoy a massive labour supply shock that helped keep inflation tame”, according to Eswar Prasad, a professor of economics at Cornell University.

But as China’s share of world merchandise exports has risen from 1.1 per cent in 1982 to above 10 per cent at the end of last year, the moderating effect of China on advanced economy inflation is waning. Now that Chinese products are so important, domestic inflation in advanced economies is no longer immune from events in China.

Policymakers now fret that the future for advanced economies might be one of persistently more expensive imports because rapid growth raises both wages and the price of commodities necessary for manufacturing goods. In such a world, higher imported inflation would have to be offset by lower domestic inflation – or governments have to accept an overall acceleration of price rises.

In a speech last month, Spencer Dale, Bank of England chief economist, noted with particular concern that inflationary pressures in China were unlikely to be offset by a corresponding depreciation in the value of its currency. “Where economies operate pegged exchange rate regimes, it is far from clear that this can be relied upon, at least in the near term,” he said.

That said, three factors mitigate the potential effect of China’s rising wages, according to some economists.

First, more pricey Chinese labour still represents only a fraction of the final price of goods sold in Europe and the US. Prof Prasad says the value of goods exported from China that is actually created in the country is just 10 to 15 per cent. “The low value-added share implies that even a significant rise in China’s labour costs won’t add much to the final costs of processed exports.”

Second, Chinese productivity levels are not standing still. They have soared in the past 20 years, allowing companies to increase pay rapidly without significantly raising final prices. Gavekal Dragonomics, an economic consultancy based in Beijing and Hong Kong, says China’s exporters have moved up the value chain, and its ports and highways are almost as sophisticated as those in the developed world, allowing exports to rise despite rapid wage increases.

Third, as Chinese wages rise, some production will shift to lower-wage economies, keeping the global price low. Li & Fung, for example, reported in late March that it had moved some of its clothing production to Bangladesh, Vietnam, Indonesia and India.

But sourcing goods in lower-wage economies is not always easy. Michael Austin, chief financial officer of Top Form International, headquartered in Hong Kong, says the company is moving some of its mass-market bra-making to Thailand, but China still accounts for about half of its production. More expensive bras requiring detailed lace work must stay in China, he says, as worker productivity is much higher and “the learning time is so much less in China. In China, people work to live,” he says.

Michael Enright of the University of Hong Kong says he was asked by a client considering sourcing manufacturing from Asia to compare Chinese and Indian transport, electricity and labour costs. “They would have had to pay a negative wage to manufacture [the product] in India. People don’t understand how much ahead China is in infrastructure,” he says.

The benefits to China of rising wage levels and productivity are clear. In a lane near a cluster of factories in Foshan last month, two 20-something women were reading flyers on a noticeboard advertising vacancies. Wangli, 27, and her friend, Xiaoye, 24, were unimpressed by an offer of work at a lightbulb maker seeking workers with a “serious attitude who could eat bitterness” (which loosely translated, means the ability to make sacrifices).

Instead, they glanced at another advertisement. A stainless steel factory was offering salaries of about $250-$370 a month for “female packaging workers” to as much as $700 for experienced machine operators. The inducements did not stop at higher salaries. “We have a brand new dormitory building with air conditioning and hot water ... We can organise birthday and bonfire parties and trips,” the company promised.

The improved prospects for Wangli and Xiaoye are far from a disaster for advanced economies but it is likely that the days of ever cheaper imported labour-intensive low-wage Chinese goods are coming to an end.

If China is no longer exporting deflation, domestic prices in Europe and the US will have to be kept on a rather tighter rein in future.

Additional reporting by Lydia Guo
.
 
. . .
I think China will become middle income by 2015, and the nominal GDP will be similar to US of 2010 by then.
 
.
I think China will become middle income by 2015, and the nominal GDP will be similar to US of 2010 by then.

Middle income is defined as 3000-10000 USD gdp/capita. We're already middle. The question is, can we escape being middle income and become high income?
 
.
Middle income is defined as 3000-10000 USD gdp/capita. We're already middle. The question is, can we escape being middle income and become high income?
i think so. chinese people value education and the government invests money into R&D.
 
.
i think so. chinese people value education and the government invests money into R&D.

We have indicators on the level of Latin America like income inequality.

We also have indicators on the level of advanced European countries like Ireland like RD expenditure percentage of GDP.

Depends on which one will win out.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom