What's new

China drops Arunachal to create ‘positive’ vibes before Li Keqiang’s India

In spite of the internal political crisis,Indian economy will go at a slow and steady rate.It is impossible for both the neighbours to ignore each other a this stage.That's why after having differences on border issues several chinese companies are involved in major infrastructure projects in India.This is a big gesture from China's side acknowledging the sensitivity of Indians on Arunachal issue.

Brave talk indeed. How quickly you forget the lesson our villagers with bamboos taught your ITBP battalion at Padua! Btw, we were never worried about India's intentions. When you face us your ar-- gets exposed to the Chinese.

LOL..Hats off to you. Since my joining to this forum I have seen guys like you, facing utter humiliation from Indians. But you never seem to take a break:lol:
 
.
Is this what Indian free press is all about? Instead of reporting news, TOI creates news based on assumptions, conjectures, guesswork, speculations?

And all these Indian call center workers instead of doing their job at work, blogging nonsense 24/7?

If China can create a positive vibe (I don't even know what it means) like this as TOI says, then India deserves to be treated like a 5-year old.
 
.
Indians need self delusion after Ladakh spanking.
 
. . . .
And all say hail to wu wu wu! whu ran back without firing a bullet! wu wu wu!

34452.gif

What about his armoured battalion and megaton farts
 
. . .
No media in China creates negative sentiment against India. Not the state media, not the private media.

Not due to friendliness, but rather because people aren't particularly interested in such news.

It's not profitable. The exact opposite of the Indian media, who have found a TRP goldmine in China scaremongering.

Dear CD, ur media have got its gun trained on its arch enemy Japan and its allies. Adding to that, an unstable Korean Peninsula. For ur media, those are TRP goldmine.
For our media, its Pakistan, now lately China.
For BDians, its India. This is how media wrks in all countries. :)
 
.
Then in 1971 why were most of the formations used Mountain Divs? Were you in ACC or R&VC?

We have noted how low can cowardice go when pursued by a student of The Arthasastra? We will take revenge in the open maidan.

That was because the decision by the planners, 'Jake' Jacob leading them, was to attack from the east, not, as expected, from the west. The only formations available over there were mountain divisions, but it seemed appropriate to use them, because there were no armoured or mechanised units opposing them, mainly infantry scattered in penny packets; also because bringing in regular divisions would have meant shipping them across from the western front.

No troops were ever dedicated to East Pakistan. As one poster put it, the Coast Guard, the BSF and the state armed constabulary would be enough; that is actually what was done in 1965, against Brigadier Torgul's seven battalions of EPR. The three armed police battalions, two battalions of the EFR and some few CRP companies were enough to give them a bloody nose.

There is no unit or formation called the ACC. If you want to sound like an expert, do your homework. And don't strut strategic stuff; it doesn't suit you. Just stick to warnings of the Chinese sort, 'open maidan' and all that. The only use that your lot have made of open maidans has been to increase their organic fertility.

It must be nice to make threatening noises and ask your friends to hold you back so that you don't inflict too much damage on your opponent. Typical blow-hard drawing room desperado.

We humiliated India by discussing its horrific darkside even after we intimidated them into submission in Ladakh and coerced them into canceling military exercises with USA and Japan.

Your vocabulary has improved. Now start working on the content.
 
. .
The CHinese blue book is a mere eyewash. Actions speak louder than words.......
 
.
That was because the decision by the planners, 'Jake' Jacob leading them, was to attack from the east, not, as expected, from the west. The only formations available over there were mountain divisions, but it seemed appropriate to use them, because there were no armoured or mechanised units opposing them, mainly infantry scattered in penny packets; also because bringing in regular divisions would have meant shipping them across from the western front.

No troops were ever dedicated to East Pakistan. As one poster put it, the Coast Guard, the BSF and the state armed constabulary would be enough; that is actually what was done in 1965, against Brigadier Torgul's seven battalions of EPR. The three armed police battalions, two battalions of the EFR and some few CRP companies were enough to give them a bloody nose.

There is no unit or formation called the ACC. If you want to sound like an expert, do your homework. And don't strut strategic stuff; it doesn't suit you. Just stick to warnings of the Chinese sort, 'open maidan' and all that. The only use that your lot have made of open maidans has been to increase their organic fertility.

It must be nice to make threatening noises and ask your friends to hold you back so that you don't inflict too much damage on your opponent. Typical blow-hard drawing room desperado.



Your vocabulary has improved. Now start working on the content.

1. Mountain troops, like the Marines, are basically infantry.

2. Your parent corpse appear to be ACC = Army Corps of Clerks.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom