What's new

China Distorts History Ahead of World War II Commemoration

WuMaoCleverbot

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
Country
Philippines
Location
Philippines
China Distorts History Ahead of World War II Commemoration
Aug 17, 2015|by Richard Sisk

China spent last week excoriating Japan for twisting the history of World War II while spreading distortions of its own on the 70th anniversary of the war's end.

Even China's Global Times, a tabloid owned by the People's Daily Communist Party newspaper, said China had gone too far by putting photos of an actor portraying Mao Tse-tung (now Mao Zedong) on posters for a movie on the Cairo Conference of 1943.

Mao was not in Cairo for the meeting on war strategy with President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill but his arch-enemy, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, was.


The Global Times quoted art critic Sima Pingbang as saying that "By featuring Mao, who was not present at the meeting, but excluding Chiang, the poster shows no respect for history nor to Mao."

China was playing up Mao's exploits during World War II ahead of the Sept. 3 military parade and commemoration of what is known in Beijing as the "Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and World Anti-Fascist War."

However, most historians say it was Chiang's Kuomintang (KMT) forces that bore the brunt of the fighting against Japan while Mao saved his troops for the 1945-49 civil war, which ended with Chiang fleeing to Formosa (Taiwan).


The Cairo film was one of more than 10 new movies,12 TV dramas, 20 documentaries and 183 war-themed stage performances in China leading up to Sept. 3, Reuters reported.

The military parade in Tiananmen Square has posed a dilemma for world leaders unwilling to attend a display of China's military might yet also unwilling to offend a world economic power.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he would attend but the U.S., Britain, India and others have yet to commit. It was also not known if Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe had been sent an invitation.

Last Friday, as Japan marked the 70th anniversary, the conservative and nationalist Abe expressed "deep remorse" for Japan's actions but did not make an apology of his own. He also said that future generations of Japanese should not have to apologize.

The following day, the 81-year-old Emperor Akihito, whose father Emperor Hirohito announced Japan's surrender, expressed his own sorrow over the war in what some Japanese commentators saw as a rebuke to Abe.

"Reflecting on our past and bearing in mind the feelings of deep remorse over the last war, I earnestly hope that the ravages of war will never be repeated," Akihito said.

A commentary in China's official Xinhua news agency charged that the "revisionist" Abe had "shied away from assuming responsibility for launching a war of aggression upon other countries, saying Japan tried to 'overcome its diplomatic and economic deadlock through the use of force.'"

The U.S. left its response to National Security Council spokesman Ned Price who said in a statement that "We welcome Prime Minister Abe's expression of deep remorse for the suffering caused by Japan during the World War II era, as well as his commitment to uphold past Japanese government statements on history."

"We also value Prime Minister Abe's assurances of Japan's intent to expand upon its contributions to international peace and prosperity in the years ahead."

China Distorts History Ahead of World War II Commemoration | Military.com
 
.
It was the PLA that defeated the Japanese invasion. Not the KMT. KMT was not interested in defeating Japan, it was more interested in defeating the PLA. This was why Japan did so much damage to China. The heaviest defeats inflicted on the Japanese military was in areas controlled by the PLA. The PLA resisted fiercely which made Japan send even more troops which helped KMT troops to regroup. The easiest victories by the Japanese were on the KMT troops. Anyone that don't understand this basic fact clearly don't understand history.

If CPC was in charge of China during the Japanese invasion, Japan would never have gotten as far into China as they did for as long as they did. It was due to the sheer incompetence of the KMT that China suffered as much as it did. PLA just dismantled the KMT military after dealing with the Japanese invasion.

It was the PLA that kicked out the US military and its allies out of North Korea despite the US having overwhelming military advantage. Any other military would have been easily defeated and surrendered to the Americans and its allies. US military was at the China-North Korea border when PLA decided to enter the war as China thought the next step for the US was an invasion of China. China joined the war, not to protect North Korea, but to protect China. After PLA joined the war, the US military went from being at the China-North Korea border to being kicked all the way back to the North Korea-South Korea border. The PLA did that.

It was the PLA that dismantled the spine of the Indian military in 1962 and gave India its worst and most humiliating military spanking since it got independence. To this very day, Indian military is petrified of the PLA. The psychological scars still affect every Indian to this day. The PLA did that.

It was the PLA that pushed back against the Soviet Union in the border war. Any other military would have easily lost to the Soviet military machine considering the overwhelming advantage the Soviet military had.

All these were done in Mao's time. Mao was one of the greatest military leaders in history. Considering the limited resources he had at his disposal and the fact that he had to fight against the Japanese, US and Soviet militaries at their best and China at its weakest and come out well shows what a great military leader Mao was and what a brilliant force the PLA is. Any other military fighting against these 3 militaries would end up like what happened to Iraq.

If anyone is distorting history, it's the United States by claiming they defeated the Nazis. What an absolute joke. US contributed NOTHING to defeating the Nazis. NOTHING. The Soviet Union defeated the Nazis. Once 95% of the Nazi military machine was destroyed by the Soviets, the Americans come in and claim victory. What an absolute joke.

Typical Anglo-Saxon propaganda machine at work.
 
Last edited:
. .
It was the PLA that defeated the Japanese invasion. Not the KMT. KMT was not interested in defeating Japan, it was more interested in defeating the PLA. This was why Japan did so much damage to China. The heaviest defeats inflicted on the Japanese military was in areas controlled by the PLA. The PLA resisted fiercely which made Japan send even more troops which helped KMT troops to regroup. The easiest victories by the Japanese were on the KMT troops. Anyone that don't understand this basic fact clearly don't understand history.

If CPC was in charge of China during the Japanese invasion, Japan would never have gotten as far into China as they did for as long as they did. It was due to the sheer incompetence of the KMT that China suffered as much as it did. PLA just dismantled the KMT military after dealing with the Japanese invasion.

It was the PLA that kicked out the US military and its allies out of North Korea despite the US having overwhelming military advantage. Any other military would have been easily defeated and surrendered to the Americans and its allies. US military was at the China-North Korea border when PLA decided to enter the war as China thought the next step for the US was an invasion of China. China joined the war, not to protect North Korea, but to protect China. After PLA joined the war, the US military went from being at the China-North Korea border to bring kicked all the way back to the North Korea-South Korea border. The PLA did that.

It was the PLA that dismantled the spine of the Indian military in 1962 and gave India its worst and most humiliating spanking since it got independence. To this very day, Indian military is petrified of the PLA. The psychological scars still affect every Indian to this day. The PLA did that.

It was the PLA that pushed back against the Soviet Union in the border war. Any other military would have easily lost to the Soviet military machine.

All these were done in Mao's time. Mao was one of the greatest military leaders in history. Considering the limited resources he had at his disposal and the fact that he had to fight against the Japanese, US and Soviet militaries and come out well shows what a great military leader Mao was and what a brilliant force the PLA is. Any other military fighting against these 3 militaries would end up like what happened to Iraq.

If anyone is distorting history, it's the United States by claiming they defeated the Nazis. What an absolute joke. US contributed NOTHING to defeating the Nazis. NOTHING. The Soviet Union defeated the Nazis. Once 95% of the Nazi military machine was destroyed the Americans come in and claim victory. What a joke.

Typical Anglo-Saxon propaganda machine at work.


This seems so much like from The Red Book
 
.
LOL at Americans humiliated by Chinese power. The OP makes up imaginary stories about Mao.

They got one thing right: Akihito is offering apologies for Japanese aggression because he knows the power of victorious nation and UNSC P5 China!
 
Last edited:
.
This seems so much like from The Red Book

Go enjoy reading your imaginary 'wars' in 1967 from the little Hindu book. And don't forget to enjoy the famous Hindu story of one supa duper Indian soldier killing 300 soldiers :lol:

Because in the only war between PLA and Indian military, PLA beat the living snot out of the Indian military.

PLA didn't just beat you, PLA inflicted psychological scars on India.
 
Last edited:
. .
It was the PLA that defeated the Japanese invasion. Not the KMT. KMT was not interested in defeating Japan, it was more interested in defeating the PLA. This was why Japan did so much damage to China. The heaviest defeats inflicted on the Japanese military was in areas controlled by the PLA. The PLA resisted fiercely which made Japan send even more troops which helped KMT troops to regroup. The easiest victories by the Japanese were on the KMT troops. Anyone that don't understand this basic fact clearly don't understand history.

If CPC was in charge of China during the Japanese invasion, Japan would never have gotten as far into China as they did for as long as they did. It was due to the sheer incompetence of the KMT that China suffered as much as it did. PLA just dismantled the KMT military after dealing with the Japanese invasion.

It was the PLA that kicked out the US military and its allies out of North Korea despite the US having overwhelming military advantage. Any other military would have been easily defeated and surrendered to the Americans and its allies. US military was at the China-North Korea border when PLA decided to enter the war as China thought the next step for the US was an invasion of China. China joined the war, not to protect North Korea, but to protect China. After PLA joined the war, the US military went from being at the China-North Korea border to being kicked all the way back to the North Korea-South Korea border. The PLA did that.

It was the PLA that dismantled the spine of the Indian military in 1962 and gave India its worst and most humiliating military spanking since it got independence. To this very day, Indian military is petrified of the PLA. The psychological scars still affect every Indian to this day. The PLA did that.

It was the PLA that pushed back against the Soviet Union in the border war. Any other military would have easily lost to the Soviet military machine considering the overwhelming advantage the Soviet military had.

All these were done in Mao's time. Mao was one of the greatest military leaders in history. Considering the limited resources he had at his disposal and the fact that he had to fight against the Japanese, US and Soviet militaries at their best and China at its weakest and come out well shows what a great military leader Mao was and what a brilliant force the PLA is. Any other military fighting against these 3 militaries would end up like what happened to Iraq.

If anyone is distorting history, it's the United States by claiming they defeated the Nazis. What an absolute joke. US contributed NOTHING to defeating the Nazis. NOTHING. The Soviet Union defeated the Nazis. Once 95% of the Nazi military machine was destroyed by the Soviets, the Americans come in and claim victory. What an absolute joke.

Typical Anglo-Saxon propaganda machine at work.

Yawn yawn...etc

Fortunately PRC Chinese forum is more interesting than this,

t017de3fdb995c636dd.jpg
 
.
Yawn yawn...etc

Fortunately PRC Chinese forum is more interesting than this,

t017de3fdb995c636dd.jpg

Singapore was too busy worshipping the British and Americans while China was fighting for its independence.

It is because CPC and China's strength that Asia has any sort of dignity.

Every other Asian country is a subservient doormat to the Anglo-Saxon race. No bigger Anglo-Saxon bum kisser than Lee Kuan Yew.

Americans say jump, rest of Asia says how high my master.

China is the only country in all of Asia that can stand up to the Americans.
 
. . .
If anyone is distorting history, it's the United States by claiming they defeated the Nazis. What an absolute joke. US contributed NOTHING to defeating the Nazis. NOTHING. The Soviet Union defeated the Nazis. Once 95% of the Nazi military machine was destroyed by the Soviets, the Americans come in and claim victory. What an absolute joke.
.

Aren't you overlooking a few things...
Who was flying bomber missions over Germany blowing up armament factories crippling the Nazi war machine? The Russians? Who was blockading the sea so they couldnt get any material for their weaponry.? The Russians?? Who was cutting off their oil supplies? The Russians??

Yes, the Russians were great at sending tons of men to die at the front in a sheer brute force war of attrition.

We on the other hand after WW1 knew there was a smarter way.
 
.
4 quarters for a buck IMHoO …

History is written by the victors in any case.
The only difference is that under totalitarian regimes,
history is re-written by the winners too, big whoop!

:lazy: Tay.
 
.
Aren't you overlooking a few things...
Who was flying bomber missions over Germany blowing up armament factories crippling the Nazi war machine? The Russians? Who was blockading the sea so they couldnt get any material for their weaponry.? The Russians?? Who was cutting off their oil supplies? The Russians??

Yes, the Russians were great at sending tons of men to die at the front in a sheer brute force war of attrition.

We on the other hand after WW1 knew there was a smarter way.

LOL don't make me laugh. American contribution to defeating Nazi Germany is less than 5% and even that is giving too much credit to the actual American contribution.

American schools brainwash kids to believe the US beat Nazi Germany. That's not beyond propaganda, that's the most disgusting form of filth. Propaganda is not a strong enough term.
 
.
LOL don't make me laugh. American contribution to defeating Nazi Germany is less than 5% and even that is giving too much credit to the actual American contribution.

American schools brainwash kids to believe the US beat Nazi Germany. That's not beyond propaganda, that's the most disgusting form of filth. Propaganda is not a strong enough term.

Where is it taught the U.S. alone won the war?
Please stop reading your Communist propaganda and thinking you know what is taught here. You are clueless.

Germany was caught in a multi front war. They had a nice huge front on the east where they were slugging it out nastily with the Russians. We were in the west bombing their war industries to the point where they were helpless. Stalin had no interest in anything strategic and had no problem using millions of men (10M dead) as cannon fodder in a brute force push. The total war dead of Germany on ALL fronts was less than half of that.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom