What's new

China did not have record of Tibet in History

Status
Not open for further replies.

apiSubmarine

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
347
Reaction score
0
Country
United States
Location
United States
Although china has 6000 years in history, but China's history did not indicated Tibet territory ,
so , can China re-write their history , China history didn't have any record showing Tibet belong to China in Map . Does anyone here has better explanation .
 
. . .
Tibet is not so good though a highland,outsiders just forget about it please.
 
.
Hindustan was never a united country till british came.. it was a land ruled by different raja's, mahrajas and ranies.
Its a matter of race some does wanted to live united and some dont..
Discussion was about tibet , why in the hell do you need pull in india ?:offpost:
India was not a united country and pakistan existed from ancient ages 5000 years ago. Happy now?
 
.
Vietnam has never been an independent state, u r rebellion from China.
Champa never belong to Vietnam, would you should get out of the south, get out of Champa?

u Vietnamese IQ really is monki level.

Free Champa!!!

Vietnam belong to China!
 
. .
Discussion was about tibet , why in the hell do you need pull in india ?:offpost:
India was not a united country and pakistan existed from ancient ages 5000 years ago. Happy now?
It is related...
Thank you for trying to make me happy
 
.
Vietnam has never been an independent state, u r rebellion from China.
Champa never belong to Vietnam, would you should get out of the south, get out of Champa?

u Vietnamese IQ really is monki level.

Free Champa!!!

Vietnam belong to China!
Way to derail the topic. Bravodo. And I only comment here because you dragged VN into it.

Let the Tibetans speak for themselves through their voices and their actions, not through the Chinese propaganda media or brainwashed CCP fanboys..
 
.
Way to derail the topic. Bravodo. And I only comment here because you dragged VN into it.

Let the Tibetans speak for themselves through their voices and their actions, not through the Chinese propaganda media or brainwashed CCP fanboys..

Tibet has 60% Hans population and a voting will see all Hans vote continue Chinese rule. We learn that from the british and American trick :P
 
.
Tibet belongs to China now. That's all.
 
.
Tibet belongs to China now. That's all.
And the western owns Peru,Chile and so on which much better than Tibet.So they should let far away Tibet out of their mind.
 
.
Tibet has 60% Hans population and a voting will see all Hans vote continue Chinese rule. We learn that from the british and American trick :P
Being a Han Chinese doesn't make one blindly love CCP. Look at Hongkong or Taiwan example. And no, it's Chinese speciality, not a Westerner product. You could stamp "Made in China" on it proudly now.
 
.
Neither Pakistan or the Indian Republic existed. What we had was a region like Europe with lots of entities within the region.

We? This "we" thing is also up for debate! Pakistan became part of this "we" mostly during the British Raj.

For most of history, much of the area known as Pakistan today has been the staging point for invasions into the South Asian Peninsula beyond the Indus, first the Aryan invasion bringing with them the original Vedic culture (note I did't say Hindu, because Hindu culture developed later as a composite of Vedic traditions and local unsophisticated customs & rituals) and later the Islamic/Central Asian invasions. So the flow of culture and civilization has been mostly inward towards the peninsula, and generally not the other way around (until modern times) - but the flow of people has been both ways.

So to use the Europe analogy, the South Asian equivalent would the entire peninsula and the Ganges delta (BD), but excluding the mountainous North East. Again going by the Europe analogy, Pakistan is South Asia's Turkey, and Pakistan's inclusion in SA is as debatable as Turkey's membership in EU.

Anyways off-topic. =)
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom