What's new

China denies armed soldiers crossed into India

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
China denies armed soldiers crossed into India

China on Tuesday denied a media report that its soldiers intruded into Indian territory in the Kashmir region last fall and threatened Indian construction workers.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said Chinese border guards had not crossed a border between the countries in the Himalayan region in northern India.

"Chinese border personnel have respected the two agreements between the two countries on maintaining peace and tranquility in the border area, and have never crossed the Line of Actual Control," he said during a regular news conference.

The Press Trust of India reported Monday that armed Chinese soldiers made an incursion into Indian territory last September, threatening an Indian contractor and his workers building a bus station near Demchok in India's Leh region. Construction had since been halted, it said.

India's External Affairs Ministry later Monday called the media report baseless, saying it was "not a cause for concern."

"It will be recollected that there are differences in perception between India and China on the Line of Actual Control in this area," a ministry statement said.

Border areas are lingering issues of tension between the countries, which have conducted more than 14 rounds of talks to resolve disputes.

New Delhi says China is illegally occupying 38,000 square kilometres of its northwestern territory, while Beijing claims a 90,000 square-kilometre chunk in northeastern India.

The two Asian giants have recently called for a stronger partnership, with the three-day visit last month by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao to India. Bilateral trade, estimated at about $60 billion in 2010, has been booming and is expected to reach $100 billion in the next three years.

China denies armed soldiers crossed into India - CTV News
 
. . .
Not sure which side of the story is true

heh. you don't trust your countries account while every Chinese will trust theirs?

why would a road / shed building crew run to the Indian army and make up a story tale. they are there to work, no work= no pay for many a day laborer.
 
Last edited:
.
Actually Chinese are correct. The area they entered is Chinese area. So, they have not actually crossed into Indian area. Upto new delhi border, it all belonged to china. Those areas once upon a time was ruled by Ching, Ming dynasties. So, based on once upon a time history, today it must become part of china. Most of Asia was ruled by the superior Chinese people 2000 years ago by Liming dynasty. So, according to history, it must belong to china. You know, Chinese want us to respect their history. Welcome to 21st Century Nazi Germany.
 
.
all this is so stupid. why don't you just split the disputed area in half and get it over with.
 
.
Guys even our own MEA has denied the reports, so all this is unnecessary:cheesy:

MEA denies China incursion report- TIMESNOW.tv - Latest Breaking News, Big News Stories, News Videos

MEA denies China incursion report
10 Jan 2011, 2203 hrs IST, AGENCIES

The External Affairs ministry was at odds with the Jammu and Kashmir government over reports on Chinese intrusion in Ladakh, saying no such incident had taken place and the media reports carrying the same were "baseless".

Reacting to media reports about Chinese troops intrusion in the Demchok area of Leh district in the state, Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao said, "We have time and again said that there are differences in perception of the Line of Actual Control in this segment... As far as this particular incident, we are not aware of specific transgression..." She also said the ministry will get in touch with the state government on this.

"I have only seen press reports emanating from Jammu and Kashmir government on this and we will of course get in touch with the J&K government," she said on the sidelines of a function to mark World Hindi Day in New Delhi. Quoting Leh Deputy Commissioner T Angchuk, a media report had said, "The Chinese troops objected to the construction work last October. The matter was brought before both the ITBP and Army, manning the border, but they directed us to stop construction work."

According to an official report, the Chinese troops, which included motor- cycle borne personnel of People's Liberation Army (PLA), entered Gombir area in Demchok region in Jammu and Kashmir and threatened the civilian workers who were building the shed, the plan for which was cleared by the state rural development department.

In a statement, the MEA said, "Government have seen media reports alleging Chinese troop intrusion in the Demchok area of Leh District in Jammu and Kashmir. These reports are baseless and do not conform to fact. "They are, therefore, not a cause for concern. It will be recollected that there are differences in perception, between India and China, on the Line of Actual Control in this area."

Asking media to exercise restraint in highlighting such issues on which there were differences in perception between the two countries, Rao said "the LoAC has remained peaceful for many years now. It is our intension that it should remain peaceful in time to come also."
 
. . .
China and India would easily agree upon the current line of actual control. However, China would not do that because it would to interfere in the India/Pakistan relationship. I'm not sure why won't India agree to such a agreement because India has more to gain from the acceptance of the existing border. India can prevent the Chinese from interfere in the Pakistan/India border issues if India and China can agree upon their borders.
 
.
Actually Chinese are correct. The area they entered is Chinese area. So, they have not actually crossed into Indian area. Upto new delhi border, it all belonged to china. Those areas once upon a time was ruled by Ching, Ming dynasties. So, based on once upon a time history, today it must become part of china. Most of Asia was ruled by the superior Chinese people 2000 years ago by Liming dynasty. So, according to history, it must belong to china. You know, Chinese want us to respect their history. Welcome to 21st Century Nazi Germany.

If more Indians thought like you then there wouldn't be all this tension between the two countries.

Mostly everything you said was correct except for the Nazi Germany part.
:cheers:
 
.
China and India would easily agree upon the current line of actual control. However, China would not do that because it would to interfere in the India/Pakistan relationship. I'm not sure why won't India agree to such a agreement because India has more to gain from the acceptance of the existing border. India can prevent the Chinese from interfere in the Pakistan/India border issues if India and China can agree upon their borders.

Sorry for being a bit off topic, but why do you think China choose Pakistan over India for their friendly economic and strategic partnership.

India has a bigger market, better economy, better infrastructure, better security situation. I mean if relationship between India-China were like China-Pakistan, instead of making the Gawadar port in Pakistan for getting access to the Arabian sea, China could have easily used one of India's existing ports on the Arabian Sea?

Does it come down to Pakistan being a Muslim country helps China get a leverage in the Oil and Energy rich Muslim countries in the Middle East and Central Asia? Why did China decide to pursue its strategic relationship with Pakistan and not India?

Or does China have some unofficial policy of not befriending its immediate and relatively successful neighbor, and instead establishing relationships with the latter's adversaries. Pakistan over India, North over South Korea comes to mind.

Just curious, not trying to troll or flame:undecided::china:
 
.
Sorry for being a bit off topic, but why do you think China choose Pakistan over India for their friendly economic and strategic partnership.

India has a bigger market, better economy, better infrastructure, better security situation. I mean if relationship between India-China were like China-Pakistan, instead of making the Gawadar port in Pakistan for getting access to the Arabian sea, China could have easily used one of India's existing ports on the Arabian Sea?

Does it come down to Pakistan being a Muslim country helps China get a leverage in the Oil and Energy rich Muslim countries in the Middle East and Central Asia? Why did China decide to pursue its strategic relationship with Pakistan and not India?

Or does China have some unofficial policy of not befriending its immediate and relatively successful neighbor, and instead establishing relationships with the latter's adversaries. Pakistan over India, North over South Korea comes to mind.

Just curious, not trying to troll or flame:undecided::china:

China In its Early Time was Ignored By the West and Had No Ally and Even Before That India and China had problems with the Territorial Divisions Of Ours, Pakistan was the Only Country to Support them and Stay with them , And More Over "Friendship Does not need a Big market or an Economy"

And Having a good Relationship with Pakistan is a Gateway to the Muslim World.... There products have a Great market if a Nuclear armed Country is Equipped with there Products...

India cannot offer any Relationship to China Which Pakistan Offers to them Except Monetarily as we share better trade relationship not Inter governmental ...

And You must not Underestimate Pakistan, There economy was better than Indias till the Late 70's when there Alliance started , and Even in the Mid 90's It Grew Well
 
.
China is under damage control mode. First it tried to bully India and other countries in the south China sea when this policy back fired they switched to peaceful approach mode.
China is what nazi germany is in 1930's.
 
.
China is under damage control mode. First it tried to bully India and other countries in the south China sea when this policy back fired they switched to peaceful approach mode.
China is what nazi germany is in 1930's.

Actually, most people would agree that United States relates more to what Nazi Germany was.

Indian emotions run high, I understand but please do not let your emotions control your thoughts :cheers:

If Gandhi found out India has nuclear bombs, what would he say?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom