What's new

China Defies Trump, Rejects US Request To Halt Iran Crude Imports

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
China Defies Trump, Rejects US Request To Halt Iran Crude Imports

by Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/03/2018

Though no shocker as we predicted previously, China has refused to cut Iranian oil imports at the United States' request in a severe blow to White House efforts to intensify pressure and economically isolate the Islamic Republic after the US withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal. However, Beijing has reportedly agreed not to accelerate purchases.

China, itself a target of ratcheting US economic pressure especially after Wednesday's shock news that President Trump may impose a 25 percent tariff on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods, remains the world's top crude importer and is Iran's top buyer.

Bloomberg reported overnight, citing two officials familiar with the negotiations, that limited concessions have been made, however:

Beijing has, however, agreed not to ramp up purchases of Iranian crude, according to the officials, who asked not to be identified because discussions with China and other countries continue. That would ease concerns that China would work to undermine U.S. efforts to isolate the Islamic Republic by purchasing excess oil.

China has long been on record as opposing unilateral sanctions and further according to Bloomberg accounted for 35 percent of Iranian exports last month, based on ship tracking data.

Meanwhile Iran's foreign minister welcomed the news: “The role of China in the implementation of JCPOA, in achieving JCPOA, and now in sustaining JCPOA, will be pivotal,” Mohammad Javad Zarif said, according to Reuters.

The Trump White House currently has teams of negotiators around the world pressuring European and other capitals to cut off trade with Iran largely unsuccessful to date in an attempt to cut its oil exports to zero by November 4.

This has been accompanied by the threat of sanctions for those who don't comply with US demands to show "significant" progress in reducing Iranian oil purchases. Bloomberg reports that a US team led by Francis Fannon, the assistant secretary of state for the Bureau of Energy Resources, recently visited China to discuss sanctions, confirmed by a State Department spokesman.

china%20oil%20customers.png


Crucially, it is as yet unclear how severe a toll this will take on the global oil market, as Bloomberg discusses the variables and unknowns at play:

The oil market has been speculating about how much of Iran’s exports could be eroded by the U.S. sanctions, with analysts from BMI Research to Mizuho Securities predicting that China might boost its imports of cheap supplies from the state and offset cuts by other nations. Countries including South Korea and Japan are reducing purchases from OPEC’s third-largest producer before the deadline to avoid the risk of buyers losing access to the U.S. financial system.

...The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, led by Saudi Arabia, has pledged to fill any supply gaps in the market after Trump’s complaints. That’s helped limit a rally in global benchmark Brent crude, which is trading near $73 a barrel after falling 6.5 percent last month. The London marker is still up about 40 percent from a year earlier.

Saudi Arabia, for geopolitical reasons, remains a close American oil partner in lobbying for global isolation of Iran at a moment when Iran's military has threatened to block all regional exports from the Persian Gulf, initiating war games this week near the vital Straight of Hormuz, prompting the Pentagon to deploy additional US warships to the area.

Meanwhile, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told Fox Business Network on Thursday that there's more pain ahead for Beijing while also attempting to calm fears of potential blowback on US consumers and businesses, assuring the public, "It’s not something that’s going to be cataclysmic".

“We have to create a situation where it’s more painful for them to continue their bad practices than it is to reform,” Ross said of ratcheting up the pressure on China and in defense of the president's escalatory rhetoric on tariffs.

“The reason for the tariffs to begin with was to try and convince the Chinese to modify their behavior. Instead they have been retaliating. So the president now feels that it’s potentially time to put more pressure on, in order to modify their behavior,” he said.

Ross tried to calm fears further by saying Wednesday's announcement of potentially raising planned tariff's on $200 billion of Chinese imports from 10 percent to 25 percent would only amount to $50 billion according to him a negligible fraction of the Chinese economy.

But the Chinese aren't seeing it that way, as on Thursday Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi slammed talk of possible 25 percent tariffs: "Instead of achieving one's own goal by doing this, we believe it will only hurt one's own interests," he told reporters at a press conference in Singapore. He continued, "Sixty per cent of Chinese exports to the US are actually made by foreign companies, including American firms in China. Is the US trying to put tariffs on its own companies?"

"For Chinese exports to the US, many of them are no longer produced in the US itself. Is the US administration trying to raise the living cost of its own consumers?" the Chinese FM said.

FM Wan Yi called for cooler heads to prevail: "While China is ready to talk to anyone ready to talk to us, including the US, this kind of dialogue has to take place on the basis of mutual respect and equality," he concluded.

* * *

While as much as 2.3 million barrels a day of crude from the Persian Gulf state at risk per Trump's sanctions, the White House has has now as predicted gotten the door slammed by China, while India or Turkey have already hinted they would defy Trump and keep importing Iranian oil. Together three three nations make up about 60 percent of the Persian Gulf state’s exports.

While next steps remain unclear, the potential outcome for the US isn't: should China fully pivot away from US exports and replace them with Iranian product, the US trade deficit will resume rising, further adding to the pressure of what is Trump's biggest economic hurdle: the double US deficits.

The flipside is that since less Iranian oil exports will go unused, it may provide a solace to the US consumer facing the highest gas prices in four years. However, if the ongoing pipeline bottleneck in the Permian is not resolved soon, said solace will prove to be short-lived.

***

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...alt-iran-crude-imports-more-tariff-pain-ahead

US regime must do something to save face.
 
.
Why don't we (Pakistan) have an oil pipeline from Iran to Pakistan?
 
. . .
Trump is bring us back to a world where the relationship between energy and security is highlighted in international relations.

US will soon become a net oil and gas exporter primarily due to the shale boom. In anticipation of this, it is making efforts in creating a market for its oil and gas exports by displacing incumbent players or particular incumbent players. The US is using its alliance network as leverage to economically defeat 2 of its geopolitical foes, Russia and Iran. Trump's "attack" on its allies is a negotiating strategy to reconfigure the energy imports away from Russia and Iran.

37% of EU's natural gas imports comes from Russia and the US sees this as a security compromise. Displacement wouldn't happen immediately (disruptions in energy would be disastrous for Europe's economy) but investments are likely to shift away from projects relating to Russian gas to Europe over time. This would boost exports and energy investments in Norway and Algeria. Further down the road, the US would export its LNG with tankers to Europe. Another big beneficiary would be Saudi Arabia.

Though the US empire is retrenching, I don't mistake this as weakening. It is re-solidifying its interests (closer to the core). This retrenching would mean Europe is a firmer ally of the US relative to the previous post cold war era due to increased alignment of interests and greater leverage on Europe in the hand of the US.

The implications of this is that in the short to mid term, net oil and gas importing nations not effected by the sanctions and other targeted efforts would have greater leverage over price, especially in long term contracts. Though this seems like a good deal for some importers, there is a hidden premium they must pay and it could be costly if they are ill prepared.

Globally speaking, this new oil/gas and security arrangement would create a more fertile environment for war escalation around energy rich regions such as the Gulf region. The war could be artificially sparked and escalated, resulting in an dramatic oil&gas price divergence between the alliance price and non-alliance price. This would necessitate major non-alliance oil&gas importers that have interests in the Gulf region to intervene and provide security in order to stabilise price and supply. While the alliance and neutral suppliers can sit relatively idle and further geopolitical agendas.

Many years from now, increasingly escalated war against Iran has a higher chance of occurring due to energy policies between US and Europe (both a signal of intent and a catalyst). China, Pakistan and other regional major oil&gas importers should prepare for military interventions in Iran (even if it doesn't happen, it is a form of posturing). A coalition needs to be formed for the purpose of protecting common interests. In this hypothetical scenario, regional nations might find it difficult to spin a moral narrative in intervention for international audiences (due to the setup and counter narrative by other players) but that is not vital, what is vital is protecting core interests. Instability of Iran may very well come from within and get hijacked during a vulnerable time period, hard-power in such a delicate time would be essential in preserving core interests.

Another angle of this is the US providing indirect incentives for China to shift energy reliance away from Iran due to long term calculation changes. Even if it occurs it wouldn't be entirely shifted away due to potential pipelines. It would be a longer game to coerce more nations to isolate Iran, a strategy to salami slice.

Energy is very much a core security interest of any society. We must be prepared to analyse further international events in a more holistic manner.
 
.
Oil is crucial to China. Why should China curb import of Iranian oil at the expense of its own economy and why launch a trade war against China if United Snakes of America needs help from China?
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom