Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing as I didn't know about C919's timeframe. So 10 years mainly refers to retiring all 737s.The C919 aircraft will come into the commercial production in next one or two years, and surely won't need another 10 years. Not sure what did you mean by the 10 year time frame.
The C919 first order delivery is planned to be done in 2021.
Nothing as I didn't know about C919's timeframe. So 10 years mainly refers to retiring all 737s.
That's because you're a victim of American propaganda. I can't really fault you that much, American propaganda is very effective.Apart from the 787-Max, I would ALWAYS choose a Boeing plane over a COMAC plane. You would have to pay me a large sum of money to get onto a Chinese airliner.
Boeing has an absolute monopoly in the US and a duopoly with Europe. America could also withhold critical parts for Airbus planes like they're doing with China - Europe doesn't have the stones or ability to fight back. Nothing can put Boeing's future at risk.Funny thing is that Boeing is likely to be even safer as they cannot afford another fiasco as that would put their future at risk.
Mic drop!That is also what Google thought.
That's because you're a victim of American propaganda. I can't really fault you that much, American propaganda is very effective.
Boeing has an absolute monopoly in the US and a duopoly with Europe. America could also withhold critical parts for Airbus planes like they're doing with China - Europe doesn't have the stones or ability to fight back. Nothing can put Boeing's future at risk.
Until COMAC gets up and running, that is...
Mic drop!
The trade war is a turning point. The C919 and CR929 will be successful in China irregardless of their performance.
U r right to think that way.Dude, Airbus A350 is all EU with UK engines.
Sorry but I would need at least a decade of Comac planes flying safely before I step on one.
U r right to think that way.
Everyone has to start somewhere, including the phone/keyboard you're using to type this comment with.
It will take awhile for the c919's safety profile to be fully demonstrated.
I bet you can see many of them out of China. The C919 and CR929 are meant to be replacing imported aircraft at first as China now has a total fleet size of more than 3000 aircraft and the airlines normally only run a new aircraft for 10 years. So the fleet recycling is going very frequently. This market is already way too big for them.I am sure that 2-3 decades from now COMAC will be a peer to Airbus and Boeing.
I bet you can see many of them out of China. The C919 and CR929 are meant to be replacing imported aircraft at first as China now has a total fleet size of more than 3000 aircraft and the airlines normally only run a new aircraft for 10 years. So the fleet recycling is going very frequently. This market is already way too big for them.
The trade war is a turning point. The C919 and CR929 will be successful in China irregardless of their performance.
As report in China, for next 20 year China need 6000 commercial aircraft, C919 just plan take 30-40% of it, remaining will be Airbus/Boeing/Other. C919/CR929 will not replace all Airbus/Boeing plane, because china want purchase aircraft to maintain "trade balance" with EU and US.
If trade war go to serious escalation, US can block US parts for C919.
Just replace them with Chinese designed and made parts. Using foreign parts is for certification with FAA and EASA. For example, avionics are supplied by joint ventures with American companies But if you compare them with those on Y-20, there is no major difference.
COMAC used ARJ-21 to learn the FAA certification process and then threw it away after FAA refused to certify ARJ-21.
The trade war itself can only further stimulate them to build completely independent R&D capability and supply chains.