atta boy. See
@jamahir I'm a west hating commie in the end too.
Just giving you the context of why we deal with China and other large entities the way we do. You have to bring in other large entities to put a context to something correct?
"Encroaching"....
Yes the west has never had a history of colonizing and thoroughly subjugating India when given the chance....leaving a lot of the lingering reason why theres a Pakistan in first place....or why theres a psychologically damaged China (that now "bullies" as a result in son copy-paste learning from original papa kind of way) too given what they did there. How silly of me.
"Encroachment" though (in uninhabited remote area with history of this stuff), woah woah woah...China bad, China bad. Like the West would never have done that if it shared a border with India and we wipe the memory slate clean somehow of colonial period?
For argument sake, if "unconditional" support of something so bad Pakistan does (from China) is so bad....is "conditional" support from the West about half bad then?...or just a third as bad or 2/3rds as bad....or completely ok? How does it stack up in your filterexactly? Just wondering where you draw the line. Then should our exact proposed response be that same ratio?