China can double 2010 GDP with 6.3-pct growth in 2018-2020

[Götterdämmerung]

A simple question. Would you say Europe has a common language since they used to speak Latin?

After the fall of Rome, Latin was only spoken by the clergy and scholars, not even the nobles were fluent in Latin. The Latin the German nobles spoke was called Küchenlatein or kitchen Latin.

 

[faithfulguy]

Nothing bullshit about truth. Check all the graphs you want. India will still much bigger even with a smaller population.

When our countries have existed for thousands of years, what's 50 years?

In the long term, you will definitely resume your position in second place, don't worry. And this time India's population will be even bigger, courtesy of the CCP screwing up population control.



Dude, read up on India's history instead of coming off as a clueless High IQ Chinese. There are plenty of videos on youtube. Do the same with Chinese dynasties also.

India had kingdoms, but Indian kings behaved the same way as a country with many states. There were overarching rules that governed the rule of kingdoms until the Muslims invaded.

British India was only a small period of Indian history. Many kings have held more territory than they did.



Most Indians do not know English. Even among those who know English, more than 90% are not good enough to even speak legibly.



Sanskrit of course. Existed for thousands of years before the middle and modern Indo-Aryan languages came into being.

http://www.hinduhumanrights.info/sanskrit-once-a-lingua-franca-of-kings-across-all-india/







http://hindi.webdunia.com/samayik/samvidhan/index.htm

Sanskrit is the original language of Indo language branch of Indo Iranian sublanguage. South Indians are Dravidians.

If you don’t accept the global linguistic analysis that is widely accepted internationally as facts, than go argue with flat earth people on how Sanskrit is the mother tongue of all languages.

And how is Sanskrit a common language again? You haven't refute my point. The nobles and masses spoke different languages at the end of the day. The Tamils don't speak anything related to Sanskrit.

A simple question. Would you say Europe has a common language since they used to speak Latin?

This Indian believe that Latin, Chinese and Navajo all originated from Sanskrit.

 

[sinait]

Very tiny parts of India continued to have their own system, like the Tamilians, but that's pretty much the same even in China, with the South Chinese having their own system. Even if it's not as much as India's, you forget that even China has many languages.

You mean 70 million Tamils, 75 million Telegus, 38 million Malayalam, that are part of the 252 million South Indians are a "Very tiny parts of India".
What else are you spouting off your a* .

You cannot differentiate between different languages and Chinese dialects, better you just stick your uninformed comments to your beloved India,
I find it amusing how the Indians are clutching at straws reinventing facts to promote a non existent glorious past.
.

 

[randomradio]

And how is Sanskrit a common language again? You haven't refute my point. The nobles and masses spoke different languages at the end of the day. The Tamils don't speak anything related to Sanskrit.

A simple question. Would you say Europe has a common language since they used to speak Latin?

So what? The entire system revolved around Sanskrit. Even in India today, the central govt uses English and Hindi, even if everybody doesn't speak the two languages.

During the Vedic period and for over a thousand years, Sanskrit was an extremely important language even for the masses, and they did speak it. It was much later that other languages came into being.

Latin wasn't spoken in all of Europe whereas Sanskrit was used everywhere in India, even in the South. Sanskrit was pan-India, whereas Latin was only restricted to some areas of Europe.

You mean 70 million Tamils, 75 million Telegus, 38 million Malayalam, that are part of the 252 million South Indians are a "Very tiny parts of India".
What else are you spouting off your a* .

You cannot differentiate between different languages and Chinese dialects, better you just stick your uninformed comments to your beloved India,
I find it amusing how the Indians are clutching at straws reinventing facts to promote a non existent glorious past.
.

Incorrect. Except for Tamil, all other languages you mentioned came much later. So 70 million Tamils out of 1.3 billion Indians is a tiny part of India. But all of them are definitely older than Mandarin.

Even Hindi is older than Mandarin.

Sanskrit is the original language of Indo language branch of Indo Iranian sublanguage. South Indians are Dravidians.

If you don’t accept the global linguistic analysis that is widely accepted internationally as facts, than go argue with flat earth people on how Sanskrit is the mother tongue of all languages.



This Indian believe that Latin, Chinese and Navajo all originated from Sanskrit.

More High IQ Chinese knowledge.

The westerners long ago thought Sanskrit is the mother of all languages, but it is the mother of all Indian languages, not all languages. Sanskrit and Chinese are not related. Sanskrit is far too complex for it to have given birth to Chinese or Novajo.

Lol..In your sweetest dreams... Just go and get another climax with this piece of shit make up history by your white masters..Hahaha..

The so-called white masters were actually ashamed of their own culture after they became aware of India's history, they actually tried to hide it.

 

[sinait]

Incorrect. Except for Tamil, all other languages you mentioned came much later. So 70 million Tamils out of 1.3 billion Indians is a tiny part of India. But all of them are definitely older than Mandarin.

Even Hindi is older than Mandarin.

70 million Tamils out of 1.3 billion is NOT a "Very tiny parts of India".
If you want to exclude other more recent languages, then you should also NOT compare it with 1.3 billion.
Please don't pick and choose data to support your delusional contrived conclusions.

And please don't quote controversial figures without supporting facts.
How is Hindi older than Mandarin which is basically the Beijing dialect.
It was rumoured that the Mandarin dialect was chosen as the official language over the older Cantonese dialect in a vote in 1911.

You might as well say Chinese is a very new language, as Simplified Chinese started in 1949.
How is Hindi that according wiki is formed in the late 19th century older than Mandarin ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindi
In the late 19th century, a movement to develop Hindi as a standardised form of Hindustani separate from Urdu took form. In 1881, Bihar accepted Hindi as its sole official language, replacing Urdu, and thus became the first state of India to adopt Hindi.

All of this do not refute the fact that India is born of their British colonizers.
Its sad to watch Indians trying so hard, doing acrobatics, to cling to their ancient Vedic Indian grandeur.
.

 

[faithfulguy]

70 million Tamils out of 1.3 billion is NOT a "Very tiny parts of India".
If you want to exclude other more recent languages, then you should also NOT compare it with 1.3 billion.
Please don't pick and choose data to support your delusional contrived conclusions.

And please don't quote controversial figures without supporting facts.
How is Hindi older than Mandarin which is basically the Beijing dialect.
It was rumoured that the Mandarin dialect was chosen as the official language over the older Cantonese dialect in a vote in 1911.

You might as well say Chinese is a very new language, as Simplified Chinese started in 1949.
How is Hindi that according wiki is formed in the late 19th century older than Mandarin ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindi
In the late 19th century, a movement to develop Hindi as a standardised form of Hindustani separate from Urdu took form. In 1881, Bihar accepted Hindi as its sole official language, replacing Urdu, and thus became the first state of India to adopt Hindi.

All of this do not refute the fact that India is born of their British colonizers.
Its sad to watch Indians trying so hard, doing acrobatics, to cling to their ancient Vedic Indian grandeur.
.

You got to give this guy credit trying to convince others to follow his delusion.

http://spaceninja.com/content/images/2015/07/there-are-4-lights.png

 

[Jlaw]

Even worse. India doesn't have recorded ancient history at all. Ancient Indians didn't have the habit recording their history.

Their conquerors wrote their history, starting with Muslim to British conqueror

 

[Mista]

During the Vedic period and for over a thousand years, Sanskrit was an extremely important language even for the masses, and they did speak it. It was much later that other languages came into being.

Latin wasn't spoken in all of Europe whereas Sanskrit was used everywhere in India, even in the South. Sanskrit was pan-India, whereas Latin was only restricted to some areas of Europe.

No, the masses don't speak it. Yes, it's important because the nobles used Sanskrit for their religious text. But what's the percentage of the masses who speak it?

The South mainly spoke Telugu,Kannada & Tamil. Saying the South speaks Sanskrit is like saying Japanese speaks Chinese in ancient times because some of their elites learnt Chinese.

So would you say Italian and the French shared a common language?

 

[randomradio]

70 million Tamils out of 1.3 billion is NOT a "Very tiny parts of India".
If you want to exclude other more recent languages, then you should also NOT compare it with 1.3 billion.
Please don't pick and choose data to support your delusional contrived conclusions.

And please don't quote controversial figures without supporting facts.
How is Hindi older than Mandarin which is basically the Beijing dialect.
It was rumoured that the Mandarin dialect was chosen as the official language over the older Cantonese dialect in a vote in 1911.

You might as well say Chinese is a very new language, as Simplified Chinese started in 1949.
How is Hindi that according wiki is formed in the late 19th century older than Mandarin ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindi
In the late 19th century, a movement to develop Hindi as a standardised form of Hindustani separate from Urdu took form. In 1881, Bihar accepted Hindi as its sole official language, replacing Urdu, and thus became the first state of India to adopt Hindi.

All of this do not refute the fact that India is born of their British colonizers.
Its sad to watch Indians trying so hard, doing acrobatics, to cling to their ancient Vedic Indian grandeur.
.

Considering the first Hindi poet existed back in the 8th century, you are wrong by more than 1000 years. It would help if you research first before talking about stuff you don't understand.

No, the masses don't speak it. Yes, it's important because the nobles used Sanskrit for their religious text. But what's the percentage of the masses who speak it?

The South mainly spoke Telugu,Kannada & Tamil. Saying the South speaks Sanskrit is like saying Japanese speaks Chinese in ancient times because some of their elites learnt Chinese.

So would you say Italian and the French shared a common language?

Indians have always been multilingual. Every Indian knows at least 2 or 3 languages. So it's not surprising that multiple languages flourished in India.

Sanskrit was a pretty big part of South Indian culture. If you actually visit India, you will know it first hand. One of the greatest Tamil dynasties called the Chola dynasties, the name was Sanskrit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattur
Mattur (or Mathur) is a village in Shimoga district near the city of Shivamogga in Karnataka state, India, known for the usage of Sanskrit for day-to-day communication, although the general language of the state is Kannada.

Is it weird that the only village in India that speaks Sanskrit is in South India?

None of you PDF Chinese know real Indian history. You have learned your history about India from Winston Churchill, no different from learning Jewish history from Hitler. Better yet, we should all probably follow the Japanese view about WW2 in China, right?

Considering Mandarin was spoken much much later than all the languages you have mentioned, there's too much of an advantage for India here.

The fact is India was a country long before China became one, at least by 2000 years.

This is fact:
United India - 265 BC

United China - 1765

And what's worse, at least India was ruled by an Indian in 265BC, whereas the Qing Empire was ruled by a foreigner.

It's funny you lot make fun of India being under foreign rule while China was no different for over 500 years in the last 1000 years. You lot need to learn real history, not what the CCP has taught you.

 

[Kai Liu]

So what? The entire system revolved around Sanskrit. Even in India today, the central govt uses English and Hindi, even if everybody doesn't speak the two languages.

During the Vedic period and for over a thousand years, Sanskrit was an extremely important language even for the masses, and they did speak it. It was much later that other languages came into being.

Latin wasn't spoken in all of Europe whereas Sanskrit was used everywhere in India, even in the South. Sanskrit was pan-India, whereas Latin was only restricted to some areas of Europe.



Incorrect. Except for Tamil, all other languages you mentioned came much later. So 70 million Tamils out of 1.3 billion Indians is a tiny part of India. But all of them are definitely older than Mandarin.

Even Hindi is older than Mandarin.



More High IQ Chinese knowledge.

The westerners long ago thought Sanskrit is the mother of all languages, but it is the mother of all Indian languages, not all languages. Sanskrit and Chinese are not related. Sanskrit is far too complex for it to have given birth to Chinese or Novajo.



The so-called white masters were actually ashamed of their own culture after they became aware of India's history, they actually tried to hide it.

Don't worry, your masters will always do the fanfare for you. But I am not gonna waste my time to discuss fake history with you, because history is just the tool for politician to rule people, they can teach their people whatever they want. You will receive different information from your government, as we do, no meaning to discuss..and I totally understand your pride about your country. But your people will die eventually, mostly in their 60s on average, so would be better to worry about their current life instead of the fake history or day dreaming future..

 

[Mista]

Sanskrit was a pretty big part of South Indian culture. If you actually visit India, you will know it first hand. One of the greatest Tamil dynasties called the Chola dynasties, the name was Sanskrit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattur
Mattur (or Mathur) is a village in Shimoga district near the city of Shivamogga in Karnataka state, India, known for the usage of Sanskrit for day-to-day communication, although the general language of the state is Kannada.

Is it weird that the only village in India that speaks Sanskrit is in South India?

Considering Mandarin was spoken much much later than all the languages you have mentioned, there's too much of an advantage for India here.

The fact is India was a country long before China became one, at least by 2000 years.

This is fact:
United India - 265 BC

United China - 1765

And what's worse, at least India was ruled by an Indian in 265BC, whereas the Qing Empire was ruled by a foreigner.

Nope, Sanskrit is not a big part of South India. I have Tamil friends who view North Indians as a different race with different language just like how the Europeans view each other today. Continue believing the masses in North India and South India shares a common language called Sanskrit in the past or present. Which part of India are you from by the way?

According to your logic, Japan shares a common language with China too since the word 日本 is in Chinese.

Lmao. All you can quote for a united India is the Mauryan Empire or the Mughal Empire.

The Mauryan Empire didn't even manage hold the empire that large for over a hundred years. India is split into different kingdoms throughout most of the history.

Whereas China proper (where the Han live) are unified most of the time and the people regard themselves as Han and roamed the land (Han area) freely.

Mandarin is one of the dialects, not language. You can't tell the difference between language and dialect?

None of you PDF Chinese know real Indian history. You have learned your history about India from Winston Churchill, no different from learning Jewish history from Hitler. Better yet, we should all probably follow the Japanese view about WW2 in China, right?

I guess the history learnt in India differs from the rest of the world, just like the Japanese view of WW2 differs from the rest of the world. Not only PDF Chinese.

And by the way, do the French and Italians share a common language?

 

[sinait]

Nope, Sanskrit is not a big part of South India. I have Tamil friends who view North Indians as a different race with different language just like how the Europeans view each other today. Continue believing the masses in North India and South India shares a common language called Sanskrit in the past or present. Which part of India are you from by the way?

According to your logic, Japan shares a common language with China too since the word 日本 is in Chinese.

Lmao. All you can quote for a united India is the Mauryan Empire or the Mughal Empire.

The Mauryan Empire didn't even manage hold the empire that large for over a hundred years. India is split into different kingdoms throughout most of the history.

Whereas China proper (where the Han live) are unified most of the time and the people regard themselves as Han and roamed the land (Han area) freely.

Mandarin is one of the dialects, not language. You can't tell the difference between language and dialect?

I guess the history learnt in India differs from the rest of the world, just like the Japanese view of WW2 differs from the rest of the world. Not only PDF Chinese.

And by the way, do the French and Italians share a common language?

Its futile to discourse with this @randomradio who uses facts from his a* whichever way it suits him.
Let them sleep well thinking how great their phantom great deluded history was but in the meanwhile have the largest amount of poor in the world and no basic sanitation.

I grew up among Indians and yes I heard them speaking Sanskrit daily everywhere in Singapore.
Go to Little India in Singapore and hear everybody speaking Sanskrit.
All Indians in the US also speak fluent Sanskrit.
Bye
.

 

[Mista]

Its futile to discourse with this @randomradio who uses facts from his a* whichever way it suits him.
Let them sleep well thinking how great their phantom great deluded history was but in the meanwhile have the largest amount of poor in the world and no basic sanitation.

I grew up among Indians and yes I heard them speaking Sanskrit daily everywhere in Singapore.
Go to Little India in Singapore and hear everybody speaking Sanskrit.
All Indians in the US also speak fluent Sanskrit.
Bye
.

Lol yeah. I shouldn't bother discussing with him. I remembered I argued with him before when he predicted India will multiply her economy 5 times in 10 years and India will become a developed country by 2030 because HDI grows exponentially there.

 

[randomradio]

Nope, Sanskrit is not a big part of South India. I have Tamil friends who view North Indians as a different race with different language just like how the Europeans view each other today. Continue believing the masses in North India and South India shares a common language called Sanskrit in the past or present. Which part of India are you from by the way?

India is a huge mix of multiple races. Most of the so called divisions that the Tamils have espoused is due to modern day politics, nothing else. It's just petty local politics, politicians have brought out differences in order to stay in power so BJP or Congress doesn't take power in their state.

I am from all over India. My ancestry stretches from North to South.

Dude, if you really get down to the nitty gritty of politics in India, it's the Tamils who claim that the Indus Valley Civilization was their creation.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...vidian-iravatham-mahadevan/article6600394.ece
Iravatham Mahadevan, a well-known expert in Indian epigraphy, especially the Indus and Tamil Brahmi scripts, on Friday unveiled what he termed as his long years of studies on the Indus Valley script, demonstrably showing that the language of that once great civilisation “was an early form of the Dravidian.”

Which means, it is possible that the Tamilians created the basis for the Vedic civilization that followed IVC also.

South Indian languages are far closer to Sanskrit than North Indian languages.

Lmao. All you can quote for a united India is the Mauryan Empire or the Mughal Empire.

The Mauryan Empire didn't even manage hold the empire that large for over a hundred years. India is split into different kingdoms throughout most of the history.

Whereas China proper (where the Han live) are unified most of the time and the people regard themselves as Han and roamed the land (Han area) freely.

Mandarin is one of the dialects, not language. You can't tell the difference between language and dialect?



I guess the history learnt in India differs from the rest of the world, just like the Japanese view of WW2 differs from the rest of the world. Not only PDF Chinese.

And by the way, do the French and Italians share a common language?

The only time China was really united was under foreign rule. The end.

Its futile to discourse with this @randomradio who uses facts from his a* whichever way it suits him.
Let them sleep well thinking how great their phantom great deluded history was but in the meanwhile have the largest amount of poor in the world and no basic sanitation.

I grew up among Indians and yes I heard them speaking Sanskrit daily everywhere in Singapore.
Go to Little India in Singapore and hear everybody speaking Sanskrit.
All Indians in the US also speak fluent Sanskrit.
Bye
.

Lol yeah. I shouldn't bother discussing with him. I remembered I argued with him before when he predicted India will multiply her economy 5 times in 10 years and India will become a developed country by 2030 because HDI grows exponentially there.

Look at that. Lose the discourse so talk about toilets.

 

[Tauren Paladin]

That's good. The faster China overtakes US nominal GDP the better.