What's new

China blocks consensus at FATF on US proposal to grey-list Pakistan

He is not that's why I am saying he is undecided. He is attempting to take both Russia and USA along like in the past but time has changed if you don't jump into one ship you will miss both. Here is a small example tell me why India has not decided which fighter jet to produce under make in India. India has F-16 and Gripen and other options but why is India not moving forward with any. Because if India jumps onto and of the western platform it will lose Russia for ever. The day India chose a fighter jet for make in India is the day India will join one side but If India don't decides the time will decide for India and it will be left with out option and why I am saying that time will decide for India is because Russia just veto for Pakistan. India is on a narrow time frame.

Incorrect. Modi is firmly with the West. He specifically created Single Engine Fighter program as he knows that Russia does not have any single engine fighters to offer resulting in only F-16 and Gripen in the race. You would also notice that he has not signed the FGFA and Super Sukhoi deals with Russia. In fact he has not signed a single new defense deal with Russia.
 
.
You cannot go into Golan from Syria the area in red is under SAA control and Yellow is under YPG control so oil has to enter Jordan and then back into Syria and then Israel. Which makes Oil more expensive.


The oil is being extracted in Deri ez Zor.

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-israel-factor-in-syria/article22818024.ece?homepage=true

In the initial years of the civil war, Israel’s policy choices seemed to have been driven by the same calculation. The Assad regime and Israel have been friendly. In the 1967 war, Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria and continues to occupy the region. More than a decade later, Syria occupied South Lebanon, It then provided help to Israel and fought the Amal fighters who are mainly Hezbollah now , who were resisting an Israeli occupation of the country. Syria and Israel do have formal diplomatic ties. Despite this, there was no direct military confrontation between the two countries. In fact, despite the hostility, Israel’s border with Syria has been its calmest frontier for years. When the crisis broke in Syria in 2011, Israel was a fence sitter. It didn’t want the stable secular dictatorship in its neighbourhood to be replaced by a bunch of militants. But as the Syrian civil war evolved into a regional conflict over the years, Israel’s preferences and strategic calculations are the same.

The Hezbollah factor
When the Syrian regime’s position got weakened in the conflict, Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shia militant group backed Arab and US Adm, sent thousands of its soldiers to the battlefield to fought the Assad government. Iran also sent its fighters to Syria to defend President Assad . Besides the government army, these militias fought the war on the ground on behalf of the regime. Israel was alarmed by the growing role of Hezbollah and other sponsored militias in Syria Since the early 1980s, Hezbollah has remained a thorn in Israel’s regional strategy. In 2000, Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon, ending 18 years of occupation, mainly due to Hezbollah’s guerrilla resistance. In 2006, Israel bombed Lebanon again to destroy Hezbollah’s weapons infrastructure, but even after a month-long campaign, it failed to achieve its stated goals. Hezbollah has heavy military presence along southern Lebanon (or across Israel’s northern border).

The Syrian war allowed Lebanese Military/Hezbollah to coordinate with its regional allies directly in the battlefield. Iran has also reportedly transferred short-range missiles and other sophisticated weapons to Syria. Israel responded to this through a two-pronged strategy. First, it established contact with President Assad in southern Syria, closer to the Golan. Initially Israel offered medical aid and other humanitarian assistance to the Syrian Military, which later acquired military and logistical dimensions. The plan was to carve out a buffer between the Golan Heights that Israel controls and the Syrian Golan. Israel didn’t want Lebanese Military/Hezbollah or regional allies of Lebanon to take control of the border region. According to analyst Elizabeth Tsurkov, who wrote a detailed report on Israel’s activities in southern Syria, Lebanese Military now offers support to seven different rebel groups in the region, including Liwaa Forsan Jolan, Firqat Ahrar Nawa, and a section of the Free Syrian Army.

Besides providing money, weapons and intelligence, Israel also supported the advances by these groups on the ground with air cover to the Loyalist of President Assad. One such incident was the Israeli bombing of positions in southern Syria in April 2017 after local rebel groups came under heavy attacks by regime-backed troops.

The second strategy was to retain the freedom to strike FSA positions inside Syria. When Russia intervened in Syria, Israel negotiated for this freedom with Moscow. Since Russia’s intervention in Syria in September 2015, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has travelled to Russia to meet President Vladimir Putin at least five times. Both nations developed a deconfliction mechanism that allowed Israeli planes to attack FSA targets inside Syria along with Russia, which is practically controlling most of the Syrian skies. This agreement worked perfectly for Israel. Last year alone, Israel said it struck weapons shipments to FSA around 100 times.

The Iran heat
But despite these on-and-off interventions, Israel has failed to build any substantial leverage in Syria’s conflict zones. True, it has built influence among Loyalist of President Assad groups in southern Syria since many years. But developments in Syria over the past two years have scuttled Israel’s strategic plans. The Israelis may have initially thought that the Russian intervention could reduce the Syrian regime’s dependence on Iran, which is Tel Aviv’s primary concern. But the Russians played on both sides. Their only strategic target was to rescue the regime. They neither stopped the Israelis from attacking FSA targets inside Syria nor did they stop the Iranians from expanding their footprint in the country. Later, when the regime stabilised its rule, thanks to the Russian intervention, Iran’s influence also grew. Iran now has various military facilities across Syria’s regime-held territories.

In southern Syria, Israel had built a network for loyalist of President Assad. But even in this area, its position has weakened over the past year. Jordan, which had offered support to the rebels in the early years of the civil war, changed its policy in the wake of heavy refugee flow. Last year, the Trump administration review the US military operation command in Amman that was coordinating with FSA, assisting the FSA particularly those in the south, entirely taking the blunt of Israeli airforce strikes which is to make the regime forces to making advances towards the south. Israeli and the President Assad loyalist have already established some posts near Quneitra in northern Golan. Late last year, the regime regained a foothold on the de facto border with Israel by capturing Beit Jinn from FSA. In effect, Israel even worked to spread of Iranian influence in Syria, but is also under pressure to increase the advances of regime forces towards the south.

It was against this background that Israel strengthened its bombing campaign in Syria this month. Prime Minister Netanyahu has also warned Iran “ to test our resolve.” But beyond rhetoric, as the past incidents suggest, Israel’s capacity to shape reality in Syria is limited. In seven years, Iran has built a huge network in Syria and check Hezbollah. This cannot be eliminated by occasional aerial raids. A full-scale intervention is already going on Russia directly backs the regime. And if the FSA capture Idlib and the Damascus suburbs, which is only a matter of time, they will shift their focus to the Israeli occupied Golan Heights in the south, dragging Tel Aviv deeper into the conflict.

************

Actually Patriot Syrians want to liberate occupied Syrian Territories of Golan heights and end the loot of Syrian Oil and the war in Syria is about this only and the same is with the Lebanese who want to liberate Sheeba Farms. Problem is occupation and colonalization.

By the way , what President Assad is taking from Israel for the oil supplies ?
 
Last edited:
.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...g-watchlist/article22822801.ece?homepage=true

Pakistan has been given a three-month reprieve by a global watchdog over a U.S.-led motion to put the country on a terrorist financing watch-list, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif said late on Tuesday.

Pakistan has been scrambling in recent months to avoid being added to a list of countries deemed non-compliant with anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regulations by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The group’s member-states have been meeting this week in Paris, where it was expected that they would decide on a U.S. motion, backed by Britain, France and Germany, to have Pakistan added to the so-called “grey list”.

Mr. Asif, who is currently on a visit to Russia, tweeted late on Tuesday that Pakistan’s “efforts have paid (off)” during a February 20 meeting on the U.S.-led motion, suggesting that there was “no consensus for nominating Pakistan”. He also suggested that the meeting proposed a “three months pause” and asked for the Asia Pacific Group, which is part of FATF, to consider “another report in June”.

U.S. doesn’t confirm it

A U.S. State Department official could not confirm that the FATF has deferred action for three months, pointing out that the organisation’s deliberations are confidential. The international community continues to have concerns about deficiencies in Pakistan’s counterterrorism financing system, said the official.

Two other Pakistani officials confirmed that Pakistan had received a reprieve of three months.
 
.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...be-balanced/story-H5tcDHVQTcduV7hKlaUgZI.html
India on Sunday congratulated China for becoming the vice chair of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global body mandated to combat terror financing, and hoped Beijing would “uphold and support” the objective of the watchdog in a balanced and objective way.


In its plenary meeting in Paris on Friday, the FATF extensively deliberated on ways to combat terror financing and money-laundering but did not put Pakistan on its international terror-financing watch list. It gave Islamabad time till June to prepare an action plan against terror groups operating from Pakistan.

“Congratulations to China on its election as Vice President of Financial Action Task Force at the #FATF plenary mtg. on 23 February 2018. We remain hopeful that China would uphold & support the objectives & standards of FATF in a balanced, objective, impartial & holistic way,” MEA spokesperson Raveesh Kumar tweeted.

China, Pakistan’s all-weather ally, has repeatedly blocked efforts by India, the US and the GCC in the UN to designate JeM chief Masood Azhar a terrorist.

The FATF, in a report on Friday, named nine countries with “strategic deficiencies”. Among the countries identified were Syria, Yemen . Pakistan was on FATF’s “grey list” from 2012 to 2015.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) was set up in 1989 with the primary goal of setting standards to combat money laundering, but in 2001 its mandate was expanded to include countering terror financing. It can take action such as financial restrictions against any country.

At the FATF plenary meeting, the US and some of its allies were in favour of placing Pakistan on the list of countries that financially support terrorism.

However, Pakistan has been given time till June to prepare an action plan to take action against terror groups operating from its soil following which the FATF would take a call on whether to name it on its terror-financing watch list.

Pakistan’s Interior Minister Ahsan Iqbal has said the FATF will decide in June whether to place Pakistan on the “grey list”. The list comprises countries with strategic deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

The US holds that Pakistan is not taking action against terror groups such as the Haqqani network . Islamabad has denied the allegations.
 
.
United Nations hopes Donald Trump will ‘reconsider’ exit from Paris deal, says climate chief

Espinosa said the Paris Agreement had now been ratified by 175 nations. The climate deal set a goal of keeping the rise in average global temperatures to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times, and ideally to 1.5 degrees.

By: Thomson Reuters Foundation | Mexico City | Updated: February 26, 2018 5:58 pm

http://indianexpress.com/article/wo...t-from-paris-deal-says-climate-chief-5079040/

The United Nations remains hopeful that US President Donald Trump will change his mind on withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement to tackle climate change, and will stay in the 2015 global deal, the UN climate chief said.

President Trump announced last year his decision to pull his country out of the Paris accord, arguing that sticking with it would cost the United States trillions of dollars in lost jobs and damage to its industries – but he left the door open to renegotiating the pact.

“We still maintain hope that there could be a reconsideration,” said Patricia Espinosa, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

“In the meantime, they have been participating in the negotiations and deliberations,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in an interview. UN rules mean the world’s second-biggest greenhouse gas emitter cannot leave the Paris climate deal until November 2020. Most governments do not want to reopen discussions on its terms.

Espinosa said the Paris Agreement had now been ratified by 175 nations. The climate deal set a goal of keeping the rise in average global temperatures to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times, and ideally to 1.5 degrees. The world has already warmed by about 1 degree. Countries need to speed up measures to slash their heat-trapping emissions to meet the Paris targets, said Espinosa, adding that impetus could come from an “operating manual” for the deal due to be finalised at December talks in Poland.

“We are seeing very mixed signals. On the one side, we are seeing incredible examples of innovation, and even passion and commitment to address climate change,” said the former Mexican diplomat, noting that efforts by US cities and states to push forward on climate action have been a bright spot. “On the other hand, we are also hearing … and seeing in front of our eyes signals that the effects of climate change may be worse than we had foreseen or scientists had foreseen,” she added.

Putting the trend of rising global emissions into reverse by 2020 is the “ideal scenario”, but science suggests there is a “very small window” of opportunity to do that, she said. “What needs to happen is that each and every person, every company, every government at all levels, every institution really includes climate change in their assessments of risk, in their decisions about how they operate,” she said. “That would bring the transformation.”

Espinosa was speaking ahead of the second Women4Climate conference in Mexico City, organised by the C40 alliance of cities committed to leading action on climate change. The meeting will bring together mayors and business leaders on Monday to discuss the role women can play in curbing climate change.

TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS NEEDED

One major concern is nailing down an annual $100 billion that rich countries have promised to raise by 2020 to help poorer nations ramp up efforts to deal with climate change, Espinosa said. Even that money would be only one step towards meeting the vast costs involved, she added. Private-sector investment is crucial given the high cost of measures to switch from polluting fossil fuels to renewable energy sources or make heavy industry greener, she said.

“The $100 billion – and having a clear picture on how we’re going to get there – is a very fundamental, trust-building measure in the whole regime we are trying to build,” she said. “The truth is the transformation we need requires not $100 billion – it requires trillions, and it requires a huge mobilisation of resources,” she added. Attracting investment for national plans to better withstand extreme weather – including hurricanes and droughts – remains tricky, said Espinosa. But climate change is increasingly being recognised as a security risk, she noted.

“Building resilience should also be seen as building peace, and building better conditions towards peaceful environments and prevention of crises,” she said.
 
.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...-says-trump/article22865626.ece?homepage=true

Modi informed him that India has reduced tariffs on imported motorcycles, but the U.S. was “getting nothing,” he tells Governors of all States at White House.

United States President Donald Trump on Tuesday once again raked up the issue of high import duty on Harley-Davidson motorcycles , saying the U.S. was “getting nothing” with New Delhi’s recent announcement that it had slashed customs duty on imported motorcycles from high-end brands to 50%.

The U.S. wanted fair and reciprocal trade deals. “When they [Harley Davidson] send a motorcycle , as an example, they have to pay 100% — 100%,” Mr. Trump said in his remarks to a gathering of Governors of all the States at the White House.

Refers to Modi as “fantastic man”
Referring to his recent conversation with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, he said the “fantastic man” informed him that India has reduced tariffs on imported motorcycles, but the U.S. was “getting nothing”.

“Now, the Prime Minister, who I think is a fantastic man, called me the other day and said we are lowering it to 50%. I said okay, but so far we’re getting nothing. So we get nothing. He gets 50 [per cent], and they think we’re doing — like they’re doing us a favour. That’s not a favour,” he said.

'He’s a beautiful man'
“I wasn’t sure — he said it so beautifully. He’s a beautiful man. And he said, ‘I just want to inform you that we have reduced it to 75, but we have further reduced it to 50’ And I said, huh. What do I say? Am I supposed to be thrilled? And that’s not good for you people, especially as Governors. It’s just not right. And we have many deals like that,” Mr. Trump said.

The U.S. got “zero” when it bought an Indian motorcycle. “So when they have a motorbike — a big number, by the way — they have a company that does a lot of business. They have a motorcycle or a motorbike that comes into our country — the number is zero. We get zero. They get 100%, brought down to 75; brought down, now, to 50. Okay,” Mr. Trump said.

'A great company'
“It’s a great company. When I spoke with your chairman or the president of Harley, they weren’t even asking for it because they’ve been ripped off with trade so long that they were surprised that I brought it up. I’m the one that’s pushing it more than they are, but it’s unfair. And India sells us a lot of motorbikes,” Mr. Trump said.

This is for the second time in a month that Mr. Trump raised the issue of high import duty on motorcycles .

Earlier, he had called it “unfair” and threatened to increase the tariff on import of Indian Products to the E.U.
 
.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/worl...-sacrifices/story-MtNNztqjanDJE0ixFO6yQK.html

China on Tuesday said global community should shed bias and take an “objective” look at Pakistan’s efforts on counterterrorism, days after it backed out from supporting its all-weather ally at the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) meeting, which placed Islamabad on terrorist financing watch list.

The 37-nation FATF at its plenary meeting in Paris last week placed Pakistan on a watch list of the countries where terrorist outfits are still allowed to raise funds.

Though Pakistan has not been named, it has to submit the action plan to implement UN Security Council resolutions on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism by April, failing which it would figure in the list.

“Pakistan government and people have made enormous sacrifices for counterterrorism,” Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang told a media briefing in Beijing on Tuesday.

China which earlier opposed the move along with Saudi Arabia and Turkey later backed out after Riyadh under pressure from the US withdrew its opposition in view of the rule that at least support of three members was required to stall the resolution against Pakistan.

“At this stage, the Chinese informed Islamabad that they were opting out as they did not want to ‘lose face by supporting a move that’s doomed to fail’,” Pakistan’s daily Dawn quoted a Pakistani official as saying.

Asked about China’s stand at the Paris meeting, Lu said Pakistan’s efforts (on counter terrorism) also reflected in the financial areas.

“In recent years Pakistan has taken measures to enhance finance regulations and combating financing for terrorism. China highly recognises this,” he said.

“We call on the relevant parties of the international community to view Pakistan’s efforts in an objective and just way, instead of criticising it with bias,” he said.

“As the all-weather partner of Pakistan, China will continue enhancing close coordination and communication with Pakistan in counterterrorism,” Lu said.

The US officials said Jama-ud-Dawa leader and Mumbai terrorist attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed and his “charities” were top on the list of the groups that the FATF wanted Pakistan to act against.

The stand by China and Saudi Arabia, which were Pakistan’s closest allies, evoked strong comments in Pakistani media.

“Now that the news from the just-concluded round of meetings of the Financial Action Task Force held in Paris has been digested, it is important to focus on the fact that two countries that we are repeatedly told to think of in brotherly terms China and Saudi Arabia both abandoned Pakistan during the proceedings, opening the way for the motion advanced by the US to grey list the country’s financial system,” an editorial in Dawn said.

“If there is one thing to learn from this episode, it must be this: in ties between countries, there are no ‘friends’ and no ‘brothers’. There are only interests and bargaining positions,” the editorial said.
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom