Thats your folly,MLRS best in plains.In mountains infantry and conventional artillery still best.Because MLRS except special rounds inaccurate,use up all ammunition quickly and create tremendous logistical pressure ,thus lacking in sustained fire,lack penetration against hardened bunkers unless using thermobaric warheads.They also need roads for movement while artillery can be transported anywhere and deployed on most rugged terrain,also far easier to camoflage.That is why in afghanisthan mountain fighting,USA found MLRS was not enough even with their precision rockets,they brought in old tube artillery.Most important of all our artillery has the high ground.India also uses satellites,lol on urs being better than USA.Dont get that biased,even for a fanboy.All our modern jets have OBOGS optimized for high altitude warfare and we have experience in this area too.Bulk of ur jets don't have OBOGS and are handicapped .
We use weapon tracking radars for our artillery which we inducted after lessons from kargil.And our troops are battle hardened,yours are rookies with no real experience.In 1962 u had the veterans of korea and civil war,as well as surprise,automatic weapons and 8 :1 numbers.Now u have nothing.
You have no defense against our navy which will sink ur oil tankers in IOR with impunity,in 1-2 weeks chinese economy finished.Ur ASBM
.The one which u tested against a huge static target in the gobi desert?Ha haha.