Sir, first of all i would request you to not to call me sir, because you are the one entitled to it, not me, i am no one.
Second, i am not naraz with you, not at all, it is the writers that bother me. Seriously, since the three articles that you have posted i have been made to believe that these people have the quality and specialty to find out the 'bad' side out of an utter optimistic fact. Really, that surprises me.
They would start with uncalled for criticism and then would tone it down by 'praising' the Army, which indeed is difficult to mask as the hard work done on ground by the Army is known to all.
As for your posting of these articles here in this thread, well i never had issues with it, you are absolutely right in posting them here as they have a direct connection with the COAS, i only requested that these may please also be posted in that thread as they also bore shades of that story. i never asked them to be 'moved' there, instead you can re-post them there or just post them there as a quote - a better option as then these could be automatically linked back to this thread also.
P.S. These articles favour the Army more as they try to 'defame' it.