What's new

Chief minister Haryana is also a pervert! Makes Kashmiri girls joke

.
If you come to know you can marry your neighbourhood girl, does it mean objectification of female and would you go ahead and Rape ?

If the girl from neighbourhood refuses does it mean you are entitled to take them away?

Did the public official said anything about taking away girls without there consensus ? Not sure how you infer marriage as institution.

I can agree to certian extend that there could have been many sober ways of conveying that Kashmiris can now better mingled with society and social rituals like marriages is now possible without legal hurdles.
Well. Not sure how else I can explain to you that objectification and speaking of women as effective war booty has no place in the modern world, especially in magical democracy land India. Your attempts at mitigation are noted.

What if Israelis said such a thing about Palestinians? Or Hindus about Sikhs? Or Uttar Pradesh about Assam? Or what if Russians said it about chechnyans? Or even further back in history, white Americans said it about natives? Don't you get the problem here? Are you so culturally inept that you can't condemn straightforward cretinistic chauvinistic objectification of women, in particular where the connotations relate to pillaging females from a contested region? Especially in Indian society where Such issues have ongoing form in general society, let alone in a contested region? Especially regarding females in a region where there have been claims of mass rape/sexual violence used as a weapon of the occupation forces for decades now??

Read other less regulated forums of your countrymen to understand the mindset that rape is considered a legitimate weapon against Kashmiri muslim females, or not even necessarily a weapon to achieve some objective but just for the sake of it.

Is it any surprise that "educated professionals" protested IN FAVOUR of the Hindu rapists of a minor kashmiri girl? They - like you - claimed some mitigating issue or some contextual matter regarding the rape as the reason they protested and felt the rapists should walk free.

What pathetic embarrassing comments. Clearly Indian society is too far down the chauvinistic rape apologism pathway to understand any better.

The problem is you aren't The Congo or some other small negligible or controllable nation that happens to have a problem with weaponised female objectification against restive populations... You are a nation of a billion people.
 
. .
So the cat is out of the bag, gangu's main reason for perversion of Kashmir is actually the lust for the lighter skinned girls of Kashmir. It makes sense for the stinky self-hating ugly kalay gangu bandars.
 
.
If these gangus try anything against Kashmiri girls surely war will break out.We cannot watch our sisters being harassed simple
 
. . .
What the combined backward Mullahs of Subcontinent couldn't see but this man saw through the bullshit of Gandhi or Nehru.

images
 
.
Kashmirs are the ONLY community in india who are good looking. The rest of india is populated by the most hideously ugly, physically repulsive and vilest looking sub-human savages ever known to mankind. Imagine a Kashmiri breeding with an indian. Your bloodlines will forever be tainted with that hyper-ugly indian DNA.......:bad:..........Imagine if you belonged to a beautiful race like the Kashmiris and then you look at your offspring who have indian genes and are more ugly than the most deformed chimpanzees....... :o:..............:eek:

There is no need to go attacking genes and act like a racist to fight against vile and rapist schemes of brahmins and bhakts. These things make a lot of people uncomfortable and not necessary at all - there is nothing morally wrong in being "ugly". Just a razor sharp focus on Indian govt and fascist indian society and thugs in uniform.
 
. .
Ra[e is a national sport in India even a woman as ugly as cristine fair wasn't sparred

Raped in the golden temple no less
 
.
Well. Not sure how else I can explain to you that objectification and speaking of women as effective war booty has no place in the modern world, especially in magical democracy land India. Your attempts at mitigation are noted.

What if Israelis said such a thing about Palestinians? Or Hindus about Sikhs? Or Uttar Pradesh about Assam? Or what if Russians said it about chechnyans? Or even further back in history, white Americans said it about natives? Don't you get the problem here? Are you so culturally inept that you can't condemn straightforward cretinistic chauvinistic objectification of women, in particular where the connotations relate to pillaging females from a contested region? Especially in Indian society where Such issues have ongoing form in general society, let alone in a contested region? Especially regarding females in a region where there have been claims of mass rape/sexual violence used as a weapon of the occupation forces for decades now??

Read other less regulated forums of your countrymen to understand the mindset that rape is considered a legitimate weapon against Kashmiri muslim females, or not even necessarily a weapon to achieve some objective but just for the sake of it.

Is it any surprise that "educated professionals" protested IN FAVOUR of the Hindu rapists of a minor kashmiri girl? They - like you - claimed some mitigating issue or some contextual matter regarding the rape as the reason they protested and felt the rapists should walk free.

What pathetic embarrassing comments. Clearly Indian society is too far down the chauvinistic rape apologism pathway to understand any better.

The problem is you aren't The Congo or some other small negligible or controllable nation that happens to have a problem with weaponised female objectification against restive populations... You are a nation of a billion people.

A great post bro.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom