Hello.
Generally, I don't expect such biased points of view, I guess love for the Army is more prevalent than love for the country. Shouldn't the country be above any and every institution, even the Army? Let me try and explain to you why I disagree with you.
Since being appointed as the chief justice of Pakistan---Justice Khosa has literally assassinated the integrity of the pakistani state and the pakistani military in the shortest possible time which was not imagined by anyone---.
The Chief Judge blame the prime minister for allowing the release of the most corrupt Nawaz Sharif and for allowing him to leave the country.
The CJ was indeed correct, it was the Government which decided to allow NS to leave the country. The Government further imposed a bond as a condition for NS to leave; this condition was struck down by the court because of obvious unlawful imposition of the condition.
He took action against the army chief even though the chief justice had no authority over the issue.
The Chief Justice has no authority over the issue? Is it because the institution of the Army is above and beyond the law? What kind of a thinking is that??? Each and everything comes under the constitution and the Supreme Court is the guardian of the constitution.
He then passed a judgement ordering the parliament to pass a law for the military chief within six months---that was one big sabotage.
He should have struck down the extension based on the premise that institutions need to be made stronger, not personalities. The Army is the most professional and competent of all the organizations in Pakistan and the next in line to the incumbent Army chief cannot be considered any less competent and was fully deserving of the Job.
The reason the military chief has no designated tenure is that he can be fired anytime by the president---like in a war---he is showing incompetence or cowardice or is inactive and indecisive---in that case the president can fire the military chief at his discretion.
A tenured and designated chief when fired could go and appeal his termination in a court of law and get a stay order---. Lovely isn't it.
Now this is where you are most incorrect; it is because you fail to realize:
1. even initially the Army chief is appointed for a duration of 3 years which makes it a tenure.
2. the reasons based on which the Army Chief can be fired can be initiated with or without tenure.
3. the Army Chief, with or without tenure, will have the right to seek redressal from the Courts invoking immediate stay orders.
India & Pakistan are on the verge of a war and the judge is having his own good time acting against the military---.
Then he authorizes the death sentence of R Gen Musharraf---.
Wasn't PM IK the most critical of General Musharraf? There must be some behind the scene conspiracy on this matter otherwise such a decision is unthinkable.
And then there were these terrorist attacks by the lawyers on a hospital which the Chief Justice was not bothered about at all---.
Yeah, that is indeed one ugly stain on the judiciary and it is proof that the judges of even the superior judiciary are intimidated by lawyer mafia.
If Imran Khan had any courage and intellect left---he should charge the Chief Justice with SEDITION---Creating unrest and uncertainty amongst the public---creating a situation of chaos and anarchy---.
The Chief Judge should be in jail by now---.
IK and courage, intellect??? Think again!
